<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apply most patches &#8211; but avoid two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askwoody.com/2009/apply-patches-avoid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/apply-patches-avoid/</link>
	<description>Woody Leonhard’s no-bull news, tips and help for Windows and Office</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:06:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Primak</title>
		<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/apply-patches-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Primak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 05:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askwoody.com/?p=2363#comment-55</guid>
		<description>As with the .NET Framework 3.5 patch, you did not originally warn not to install the AutoRuns Patch (KB 967715 for Windows XP). I have installed it and everything seems to be working OK, but you really should issue these warnings before recommending readers to apply all outstanding patches (except for the Active X Killbits Patch). This makes two patches you did not warn about in your original February MS DEFCON-3 original status update post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As with the .NET Framework 3.5 patch, you did not originally warn not to install the AutoRuns Patch (KB 967715 for Windows XP). I have installed it and everything seems to be working OK, but you really should issue these warnings before recommending readers to apply all outstanding patches (except for the Active X Killbits Patch). This makes two patches you did not warn about in your original February MS DEFCON-3 original status update post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: woody</title>
		<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/apply-patches-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>woody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askwoody.com/?p=2363#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Yes. Either that, or remove .NET Framework from your system (which ain&#039;t a bad idea, unless you really need it for some application).

I hate to say it, but if you have .NET Framework installed, you really do need to get it updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Either that, or remove .NET Framework from your system (which ain&#8217;t a bad idea, unless you really need it for some application).</p>
<p>I hate to say it, but if you have .NET Framework installed, you really do need to get it updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/apply-patches-avoid/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askwoody.com/?p=2363#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Ref your latest post 5 Mar 2009

From Windows Update

Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.5 Family Update (KB951847) 

Should the above be patched</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ref your latest post 5 Mar 2009</p>
<p>From Windows Update</p>
<p>Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Service Pack 1 and .NET Framework 3.5 Family Update (KB951847) </p>
<p>Should the above be patched</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

