<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avast! Ahoy me false positive hardies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askwoody.com/2009/avast-ahoy-false-positive-hardies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/avast-ahoy-false-positive-hardies/</link>
	<description>Woody Leonhard’s no-bull news, tips and help for Windows and Office</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:06:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rc primak</title>
		<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/avast-ahoy-false-positive-hardies/comment-page-1/#comment-1382</link>
		<dc:creator>rc primak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 16:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askwoody.com/?p=3332#comment-1382</guid>
		<description>Looks like I picked a good time to fall behind in my updating. I would have gotten the bad Avast definitions file if I had updated sooner. Thanks for the heads-up. Still, Avast has had a good track record of not giving false-positives. This is the first time in a long time I&#039;ve heard of an Avast SNAFU of this magnitude. I continue to trust and use Avast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I picked a good time to fall behind in my updating. I would have gotten the bad Avast definitions file if I had updated sooner. Thanks for the heads-up. Still, Avast has had a good track record of not giving false-positives. This is the first time in a long time I&#8217;ve heard of an Avast SNAFU of this magnitude. I continue to trust and use Avast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

