<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BitLocker broken, sorta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askwoody.com/2009/bitlocker-broken-sorta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/bitlocker-broken-sorta/</link>
	<description>Woody Leonhard’s no-bull news, tips and help for Windows and Office</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:06:02 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tarquin</title>
		<link>http://www.askwoody.com/2009/bitlocker-broken-sorta/comment-page-1/#comment-1409</link>
		<dc:creator>Tarquin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:12:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askwoody.com/?p=3346#comment-1409</guid>
		<description>It make you wonder whether Microsoft actually hires experts in relevant fields.  Previously, people were advised to avoid Microsoft&#039;s backup programs, and that was over several versions of Windows and many years.  Now it seems that their encryption mechanisms are suspect.  Should one now question the efficacy of another of their non-core applications, the anti-virus program Microsoft Security Essentials?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It make you wonder whether Microsoft actually hires experts in relevant fields.  Previously, people were advised to avoid Microsoft&#8217;s backup programs, and that was over several versions of Windows and many years.  Now it seems that their encryption mechanisms are suspect.  Should one now question the efficacy of another of their non-core applications, the anti-virus program Microsoft Security Essentials?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

