4 responses to “What we don’t know about Microsoft Surface”

1. 

   rc primak June 20th, 2012 at 02:32

   There was an error in the article I cited previously. The NVidia processor is not the Tegra 3 — it’s ARM.

2. 

   rc primak June 20th, 2012 at 02:35

   From CNet’s take on the Pro vs. RT Surface Slate:

   The “Full HD display” Microsoft mentions in its spec sheet for the Windows Pro version suggests a 1,920×1,080 pixel resolution. That might also imply a 1,280×720 display (aka 720p) on the vanilla “HD” Windows RT Surface tablet.

   Does that answer the OP’s question?

3. 

   rc primak June 20th, 2012 at 18:33

   Clarification — NVidia Tegra-3 is ARM. At least, according to several tech articles.

4. 

   sanda June 20th, 2012 at 23:04

   Thanks, Woody, for your link to this article in your blog entry below. I understand little, but I do know it’s more expensive than the amount someone “opined” (opinion-made) online at slightly more than half that $ for the Windows 8 version. I shall have to google RT, but… I don’t want to pay $1000. Nobody ever talks about the cost of ISP access as a factor…

   I was especially intrigued by having a real keyboard. Am a fan of laptop. Virtual keyboard is not appealing to me. Must be an age thing going back to learning touch typing in junior high school.