Woody Leonhard's no-bull news, tips and help for Windows, Office and more… Please disable your ad blocker – our (polite!) ads help keep AskWoody going!
Home icon Home icon Home icon Email icon RSS icon
  • MS re-re-..release (again) of KB 2952664 and KB 2976978

    Posted on June 6th, 2017 at 16:09 PKCano Comment on the AskWoody Lounge

    We’re seeing a recurrence of the two snooping patches KB2952664 for Win7 and KB2976978 for Win8.1. The last time they showed up, was on March 7th, but now they’re back……

    MS re-re-..release of KB2952664 and KB2976978

    Microsoft describes them as a “Compatibility update for keeping Windows up-to-date.”

    This update performs diagnostics on the Windows systems that participate in the Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program. The diagnostics evaluate the compatibility status of the Windows ecosystem, and help Microsoft to ensure application and device compatibility for all updates to Windows. There is no GWX or upgrade functionality contained in this update.

    They are appearing as unchecked Optional now, which means they won’t be installed unless you check the corresponding box in Windows Update.
    Their status may change next week to Recommended and, for some, they may show up as checked Important on Patch Tuesday.

    If that helped, take a second to support AskWoody on Patreon

    Home Forums MS re-re-..release (again) of KB 2952664 and KB 2976978

    This topic contains 18 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by  Paul 5 months ago.

    • Author
      Posts
    • #119590 Reply

      PKCano
      AskWoody MVP

      We’re seeing a recurrence of the two snooping patches KB2952664 for Win7 and KB2976978 for Win8.1. The last time they showed up, was on March 7th, but
      [See the full post at: MS re-re-..release (again) of KB 2952664 and KB 2976978]

      8 users thanked author for this post.
    • #119592 Reply

      Pepsiboy
      AskWoody Lounger

      PKCano,

      I got it listed today, also. It is Optional and unchecked at this time.

      Time to hide it AGAIN ! ! !

      Dave

      • #119598 Reply

        Jan K.
        AskWoody Lounger

        Why?

        They’ll just un-hide it AGAIN.

        Won’t it disappear “automatically”? And even if installed, will it have any effect, when you’ve opted out of the CEIP?

        It’s certainly not easy to be microSoft with such ungrateful customers! 😛

        2 users thanked author for this post.
        • #119719 Reply

          Noel Carboni
          AskWoody MVP

          It’s optional, which makes it an option to not install it.

          Do you give the 3rd or 4th scammer to call you your credit card number? They’ll just call AGAIN. 🙂

          -Noel

    • #119600 Reply

      abbodi86
      AskWoody MVP

      Nothing serious or new 🙂

      4 users thanked author for this post.
    • #119680 Reply

      Geo
      AskWoody Lounger

      Must be some changes to 664.  I hid the March one and it was 6MB now the new one is 6.2MB`s

    • #119682 Reply

      BrianL
      AskWoody Lounger

      Just got mine at 11am this date.

    • #119690 Reply

      jescott418
      AskWoody Lounger

      Ah well at least you still can ignore them. Better than Win 10 where you get what you get and its not your choice anymore. Microsoft is sort of the nanny of your PC these days.

    • #119689 Reply

      anonymous

      We have some important updates for you (wink). They help keep your system up to date (wink).  As someone else said, at least you still can ignore them at least for a while. What other choice do you have but to move to Windows 10 which certainly isn’t better in terms of controlling updates. Not unless you fork over for Win 10 Pro which still only is marginally better. At this point I don’t see a good option, Linux still sucks, Mac OS is pricey unless you do a hackintosh. Chromebook’s are no better your in a Google world with again forced updates. Maybe I’ll go back to DOS?

    • #119701 Reply

      anonymous

      I still wonder why Microsoft is so interested in collecting information about Windows 7 systems. It can’t be for  an “improved customer experience” because there won’t be any more new features for W7 – just security updates until January 2020 (hopefully).

      In fact, there haven’t been any new features added to W7 for several years now.

      Perhaps all the telemetry is to help them find new ways to try and get everyone off W7 and onto W10 seeing as all of their previous efforts haven’t been too successful so far.

      Carl D.

      • #119706 Reply

        GoneToPlaid
        AskWoody Lounger

        Windows 7 still has nearly twice the market share of Windows 10. It isn’t just Microsoft, via embedding telemetry into Windows 7, who has keen interests about everything which Windows 7 users do with their computer. In fact, telemetry is also sent to non-Microsoft servers which are operated by companies which are not part of Microsoft. A good while back I stopped investigating just how deep the rabbit hole goes. Instead I focused on making sure that the Windows 7 operating system on my computers sends zero telemetry.

        4 users thanked author for this post.
    • #119768 Reply

      anonymous

      I now can’t keep 2952664 out by any method I know.

      I can mark it as “declined” in WSUS but it still persistently re-installs when manually uninstalled and marked “hidden” in the update client on Windows 7 Pro computers in my domain.

      “Approved for removal” is now greyed out in WSUS, so I’m pretty sure that’s no help.

    • #119833 Reply

      EP
      AskWoody Lounger

      the new KB2952664 patches for Win7 is revision V23 and the new KB2976978 patches for Win8.1 is revision V22.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
      • #120073 Reply

        anonymous

        Anyone remember what version the KB2976978 that is baked into the latest Windows 8.1 ISO (sometimes known as U3) is? if we are on v22 now?

        Also KB2976978 can be removed, it isn’t really baked in, you just have to mark it as removable.

    • #120144 Reply

      anonymous

      I’m seeing 2952664 in both Important and Optional. In Important, it is listed as 6.0MB, and in Optional it is 6.2MB. I deleted the DataStore before running the update scan to make sure there was nothing left over from before. If I hide one of them, the other remains. I now have two separate entries for 2952664 in the hidden-update list:

      Microsoft spamming untrusted KB2952664 update

      • #120148 Reply

        PKCano
        AskWoody MVP

        You have patches with the same number, but they are not the same. They are two different versions. Notice ones says optional, the other recommended. The “optional” one will show up in the unchecked in the “Optional updates” list. If you have “Give me recommended updates the same way I get important” box checked the “recommended” one will show up in the “Important Updates” list, possibly checked, but if the box is not checked it will be an unchecked in the “Optional Updates” list until it becomes important.

        The older version (let’s say v.x) is “recommended.” The newer version (v.y) comes out with the same KB number as “optional – it’s like a preview. V.y stays “optional” untill MS promotes it to “recommended,” at which time it replaces v.x (the older one) and v.x disappears. This usually happens on Patch Tues when the updates are released.

        You can have two with the same KB number as long as their “status” is different. This is the part of the “supersedence” process we frequently mention.

    • #120684 Reply

      anonymous

      Take note that not installing KB2952664 can lead to problems upgrading from Windows 7 to Windows 10,  see: https://www.niallbrady.com/2016/09/27/how-to-fix-upgrade-hang-when-upgrading-from-windows-7-to-windows-10-version-1607/

      1 user thanked author for this post.
      • #120828 Reply

        Paul
        AskWoody Lounger

        Anon#120684, that is a good thing to have in mind if you are going to go that route.

        I think at this point it makes more sense to bring your backups current and ignore any upgrade transitions and possible conflicts by opting for the often recommended ‘clean install’. Are there reasons to allow [cruf] stale bits of useless code crowding the background to exist that should have been removed?

        If Microsoft has given your machine a current stamp of approval on a hardware check, then make sure you have three things: Your data backups, separate from recovery media; A verified method to get your existing Operating System back, if you need to; Your new install media for Win10, and a key you already know will work. (OK, I guess that makes four things.)

        If you are missing any one of those things, then you are not ready to do an in place upgrade either, because things sometimes go wrong. If you have all of those things, then you don’t need to risk it. I’m always open to seeing where I’m wrong.

    Please follow the -Lounge Rules- no personal attacks, no swearing, and politics/religion are relegated to the Rants forum.

    Reply To: MS re-re-..release (again) of KB 2952664 and KB 2976978

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use Advanced BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information: