Microsoft has made the mistake of going around its partners in the past. Isn’t buying direct the way to go? No, not really. When there’s a healthy mar
[See the full post at: Attention partners Microsoft really is coming for your clients this time]
![]() |
Patch reliability is unclear, but widespread attacks make patching prudent. Go ahead and patch, but watch out for potential problems. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
Attention partners Microsoft really is coming for your clients this time
Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » Attention partners Microsoft really is coming for your clients this time
- This topic has 45 replies, 17 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 10 months ago.
AuthorTopicAmy Babinchak
ManagerViewing 17 reply threadsAuthorRepliesb
AskWoody_MVPHere are a couple of samples of the email that your clients are getting from Microsoft.
On Azure:
I hope this email finds you well! My name is Blake Wheeler, and I am reaching out on behalf of Microsoft’s Azure Team. I spoke to Lisa from (Edit: Client name) and she referred me to reach out to you. I was reaching out to Lisa about the opportunity to participate in a Complimentary Deep Dive Evaluation.
Wasn’t that first email sent to a partner, after speaking to the client, and offering a free service for both?
OscarCP
MemberNot too clear as to the facts: This is, at worst, an attempt to undercut, by offering free support to their clients, those providing computer support services for a fee or a retainer and doing that not only to the detriment of MS “partners”, but also of similar businesses not associated with MS that offer this type of service. If so, this qualifies as unfair competition.
Or it could be an offer of the option of getting free additional support, a new aspect of the MS collaboration with those “partners”, who still will be able to charge their own customers for their services, as would be anyone else, the same as before. This would be quite OK.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AVRicard
AskWoody PlusWell, if these emails are, as they do appear to be, targeted to entities with support partners, then yeah, it is kind of alarming. Does Microsoft have a good reputation for helping users in general? I’ll believe it when I see them listening to users’ expressed concerns (e.g. update quality, new-feature frequency, etc.) instead of trying to dazzle with what MS thinks might be the new shiny.
I didn’t get and save a free copy of Windows 10 when it was offered, because I deliberately wanted to wait until we had to pay good money for it, in the hope that then Microsoft would, you know, listen to people who used and wanted a productive desktop operating system .
I’m still waiting.
Win 7 Pro, 64-Bit, Group B ESU,Ivy Bridge i3-3110M, 2.4GHz, 4GB, XP Mode VM, WordPerfect-
anonymous
GuestAnd Windows 10 upgrade (from valid registered Windows 7 ) is still no charge over half a decade later. I don’t think Microsoft will ever charge for an upgrade. They want you on their Desktop platform so our next purchase includes Windows 10 preinstalled. Microsoft makes no money selling upgrades but still gets a nice price for new computers sold.
Article states the free upgrade still worked Jan 4th 2021:
https://www.cnet.com/how-to/how-to-download-windows-10-for-free-now-that-windows-7-is-dead/
Cee Arr
AskWoody LoungerI really don’t see this as the forum for this posting. Most of the AskWoody members are ‘older’ or retired folk and not the so-called target of Microsoft’s campaign. This is business related IMO. I have zero trust/faith in the Microsoft of today and nothing they do surprises me. A suggestion: Take the matter up directly with MS. I would if it were my business I was concerned about.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
amybabinchak
Guest -
b
AskWoody_MVP -
LoneWolf
GuestMost IT professionals do not run businesses.
Please speak for yourself.
I am part of a managed service provider. Our mission is to provide IT services and support for companies too small to have their own IT Pros, or as backup for 1-2 IT Pros. In some cases, we provide the software licensing only, or are there as a “just in case” or for monitoring purposes.
Do I own the company? No. However, this move means Microsoft takes money out of our pockets if successful, and it hurts the very people best suited to support the products they sell. The only thing I can be thankful for here is that Microsoft support at the Tier I level is absolutely abysmal; no company smaller than a certain size would want to work with them.
There are many good managed service providers like mine, and now Microsoft is getting greedy. It’s much like the move Dell Sales pulls quite often, undercutting firms like mine by seeing us do a server quote in their portal, then calling a client to undercut us. It’s why we only buy servers under our own name.
-
b
AskWoody_MVP -
Susan Bradley
ManagerActually it’s a growing segment as more firms outsource their IT support. It’s also a huge reason that there’s a big target for MSPs as they have lots of clients and thus are a juicy target for both Microsoft and ransomware.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
-
-
-
Susan Bradley
Manager
-
Cee Arr
AskWoody LoungerTom
AskWoody PlusIt’s not just Microsoft and it’s not new. Facom (Fujitsu’s mainframe division) did this in the late 70s. Burroughs (now Unisys) did this in the 80s. Data General (a now defunct mini-computer manufacturer) did it. Large tech companies buddy up to partners to help them sell kit and do the difficult, initial support and then try and take over. I learnt early on not to partner with the supplier. I was burned by Burroughs 35 years ago. Over the past 35 years of being a consultant I have never again partnered with a supplier.
1 user thanked author for this post.
anonymous
GuestMy first thought when reading the sample emails was, is this a scam email.
Bad first impression in my view.
Jerry2 users thanked author for this post.
NaNoNyMouse
AskWoody LoungerMy first thought when reading the sample emails was, is this a scam email.
Bad first impression in my view.
JerryMy first thought too, particularly given the shoddy writing (“reaching out” used three times in the space of a paragraph, “a good date/time that you had 15-30 minutes”, etc)
Personally I’d consider these as Junk…
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by
NaNoNyMouse.
bbearren
AskWoody MVPHow many AskWoody members/readers are Partners for whom this is relevant?
Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!We were all once "Average Users". We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems, we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.-
amybabinchak
Guest -
b
AskWoody_MVP
-
Carl036
AskWoody PlusI’m not a Partner. I’m just one of those older, retired folk who has been a faithful follower of Woody’s for many years.
What I don’t get is this: In the U.S., we have a very long history of free market competition between businesses. Suggesting that Microsoft has no right to compete seems very odd to me.
If you take almost any other business, except for utilities and similar businesses (if any), they compete with others for the business of the clients. It sounds like one of the Partners did exactly that: competed with Microsoft’s “free” support and won.
I know that I’m retired but I know that it is an especially tough market right now for almost everyone. Some businesses are in a very stagnant market, others faced by nearly overwhelming opportunities.
But without competition, there is zero motivation to provide a better service. That has been Microsoft’s problem for many years. They have basically been a monopoly in certain segments of the market (the market shares for Linux and Apple are comparatively small).
-
amybabinchak
GuestWe pay for the privilege of being a Microsoft partner, purchase from official distribution channels. This has meant that they would not compete for our customers as we are seen as their sales and services channel in the small and medium business market. In big business, Microsoft has always had a sales, support and consulting services business.
1 user thanked author for this post.
Microfix
AskWoody MVPThe way I see it is, it’s business and open competition so Microsoft SHOULD be responsible for THEIR warez and deals being bartered out. I would also think it’s good news for clients, giving them an opportunity to voice discontent, praise or even ideas for microsoft moving forward. (I must be out my mind, did I really type that!)
IOW I’d rather speak with the puppetmaster than the puppet with tangled strings.Win8.1/R2 Hybrid lives on..LoneWolf
AskWoody LoungerMost IT professionals do not run businesses.
Please speak for yourself.
I am part of a managed service provider. Our mission is to provide IT services and support for companies too small to have their own IT Pros, or as backup for 1-2 IT Pros. In some cases, we provide the software licensing only, or are there as a “just in case” or for monitoring purposes.
Do I own the company? No. However, this move means Microsoft takes money out of our pockets if successful, and it hurts the very people best suited to support the products they sell. The only thing I can be thankful for here is that Microsoft support at the Tier I level is absolutely abysmal; no company smaller than a certain size would want to work with them.
There are many good managed service providers like mine, and now Microsoft is getting greedy. It’s much like the move Dell Sales pulls quite often, undercutting firms like mine by seeing us do a server quote in their portal, then calling a client to undercut us. It’s why we only buy servers under our own name.
P.S. I didn’t mean to post this anonymously, I just didn’t realize I wasn’t logged in.
We are SysAdmins.
We walk in the wiring closets no others will enter.
We stand on the bridge, and no malware may pass.
We engage in support, we do not retreat.
We live for the LAN.
We die for the LAN.-
b
AskWoody_MVP -
Susan Bradley
Managerhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Managed_services
“The managed services market is expected to grow from an estimated $152.45 billion in 2017 to $257.84 billion by 2022, representing a CAGR of 11.1%.”
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
-
LoneWolf
AskWoody LoungerThe way I see it is, it’s business and open competition so Microsoft SHOULD be responsible for THEIR warez and deals being bartered out. I would also think it’s good news for clients, giving them an opportunity to voice discontent, praise or even ideas for microsoft moving forward. (I must be out my mind, did I really type that!)
IOW I’d rather speak with the puppetmaster than the puppet with tangled strings.Just because you buy from Microsoft, doesn’t mean you’ll get accountability from Microsoft.
Thinking that cutting the middleman somehow buys you direct access would be naive, as anyone who has ever dealt with Microsoft AnswerDesk can attest to. Unless you’re large enough to get notice from the local TAM (Technical Account Manager) because of a company relationship (which means a considerable investment in Microsoft products), you’re unlikely to see it.
We are SysAdmins.
We walk in the wiring closets no others will enter.
We stand on the bridge, and no malware may pass.
We engage in support, we do not retreat.
We live for the LAN.
We die for the LAN.OscarCP
MemberAfter reading the previous comments made in this interesting discussion (that does not concern me directly) I would like to make this observation:
If the situation under consideration is correctly described as follows:
Someone applies to, is accepted and then pays to be a partner with another business in order to provide paid services to the users of the other business’ products, but then the other business offers the same services at a discount, probably that is not fair competition.
What that may be is a bad faith breach of contract, depending on what it says in the fine print. Or even if it is a bad faith breach of contract, it might not be that in practice, if the other business has platoons of well-paid lawyers ready to pounce to counter sue and, or tangle up in procedural red tape the legal complaints, to run the clock on them and, or deplete the pockets, of the aggrieved “partner.”
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV-
Cousinjack
AskWoody Lounger -
Microfix
AskWoody MVP
-
NetDef
AskWoody_MVPTwo of my clients (so far) have received these emails. Both are from a v-(alias) @ microsoft.com. That v- designation means they are vendors for MSFT, not direct employees.
I will also note that their use of language makes these look like phishing – although it turns out the emails are “legit.”
My hope is that a new vendor with an incorrect mission assignment has begun marketing for Microsoft. I’ve reached out to some contacts to find out.
If that turns out not to be the case, then it does indeed appear that MS might be trying to woo my clients away from me. I doubt very much they would be able to provide the depth and scope of the many services I and my company provide to our customers.
~ Group "Weekend" ~
-
NetDef
AskWoody_MVPI have been informed that the v-vendors were “in some cases” overreaching . . . and that this is being corrected.
However: in other cases their intent is to reach out directly to SMB’s whom they may suspect are not provisioning enough Microsoft 365 seats for the number of actual staff using the software. In essence this may be a new audit process with a lighter touch than the Open License audits that would trigger all sorts of excitement.
To wit: if they sense that a single M365 account is being used to install and activate Office software on multiple computers (I believe up to five for the same user is still okay) but being used on a regular basis by more than one person, that business may (eventually) get these bypass solicitations.
If you are a SMB consultant, and whether or not you are a MS Partner, it might pay to make sure you have helped your clients provision the correct number of licenses.
I am in NO way saying this might be the case for anyone on this forum.
~ Group "Weekend" ~
-
NetDef
AskWoody_MVPLooks like Amy posted a similar update on her blog! Except she explains it far better than I.
https://www.thirdtier.net/2021/01/19/what-microsofts-new-auditing-initiative-means-for-partners/
~ Group "Weekend" ~
-
anonymous
GuestRemember when everyone was saying how Microsoft was a kindler and gentler big corporation after Ballmer? Sorry but Nadella is even more aggressive and has become even more of a champion for self serving policies for Microsoft. I question more about Microsoft today, than I ever did under Ballmer.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
LoneWolf
AskWoody LoungerTwo of my clients (so far) have received these emails. Both are from a v-(alias) @ microsoft.com. That v- designation means they are vendors for MSFT, not direct employees.
I will also note that their use of language makes these look like phishing – although it turns out the emails are “legit.”
My hope is that a new vendor with an incorrect mission assignment has begun marketing for Microsoft. I’ve reached out to some contacts to find out.
If that turns out not to be the case, then it does indeed appear that MS might be trying to woo my clients away from me. I doubt very much they would be able to provide the depth and scope of the many services I and my company provide to our customers.
I at least found that under Ballmer, Microsoft *listened* to IT people.
Now we’re just “those guys that support people with our software”. It takes a lot of clout to be able to get Microsoft to listen to people who know of needed fixes, or great ideas to improve their products, or “You could make it so much simpler if…”
Great example, my pet peeve in Windows 10.
Why can’t I, when choosing “Default apps by file type”, SEARCH for one of the thousands of file extensions? Why do I have to scroll through all of them until I get to the one I’m looking for? This isn’t rocket science, it wouldn’t be hard to put a search box in there. And yet Windows 10 has been out for five years and this hasn’t happened.
There is no way I’m going to get this idea to a place where it will be listened to. The level of obfuscation is simply too great for me to find someone important enough.
Back during the Windows 7 patch debacle where updates weren’t working, I tweeted Satya Nadella, and told him that if he could give me 2-3 consecutive months of Microsoft patches (Windows and Office) that didn’t break things in the process, I’d take him out to dinner in my city to the restaurant of his choice, no restrictions. Now I knew the chances of a response were nil, but I’d have pulled out my wallet any time. Even RT-ed it a few times.
Crickets. Of course, the 2-3 consecutive months never happened either.
We are SysAdmins.
We walk in the wiring closets no others will enter.
We stand on the bridge, and no malware may pass.
We engage in support, we do not retreat.
We live for the LAN.
We die for the LAN.-
This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by
LoneWolf.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
This reply was modified 2 years, 10 months ago by
-
b
AskWoody_MVPGreat example, my pet peeve in Windows 10.
Why can’t I, when choosing “Default apps by file type”, SEARCH for one of the thousands of file extensions? Why do I have to scroll through all of them until I get to the one I’m looking for? This isn’t rocket science, it wouldn’t be hard to put a search box in there. And yet Windows 10 has been out for five years and this hasn’t happened.
Yes, it’s been a long wait. But this has been available to Windows Insiders for the last nine months and is currently in builds 21277 or later. So I would expect that we’ll see it in a feature release later this year:
Over the years, we’ve made a number of improvements to Settings based on your feedback, and we’re happy to share the next one is starting to roll out. We’re adding the ability to search the lists of file types, protocols, and apps when setting a default.
There is no way I’m going to get this idea to a place where it will be listened to. The level of obfuscation is simply too great for me to find someone important enough.
The biggest frustrating failure of Windows 10 is the Feedback Hub in my opinion. Microsoft staff are under the misapprehension that it works quite effectively, but it’s clear most of them never use it. They often ask that a suggestion should be submitted there, even when it’s a minor feature which has already been requested there by many users for several years. And I’m not convinced that most problem reports sent there get any attention whatsoever.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
NetDef
AskWoody_MVPWe’ve wandered a little off topic, but I have to say I agree with this.
The biggest frustrating failure of Windows 10 is the Feedback Hub in my opinion. Microsoft staff are under the misapprehension that it works quite effectively, but it’s clear most of them never use it.
~ Group "Weekend" ~
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
Tom
AskWoody PlusApple distributors are not immune to this sort of thing either. In the early ’00s I was consulting to an Apple distributor in regional Australia (Apple didn’t have any stores more than 150Km from a major city) as their “PC and Windows Business Manager” (Yes, they did also sell HP servers and Acer PCs). They had the local University and Technical Colleges tied up and were about to sign a contract for 4 G5 Servers and 23 iMacs when Apple stepped in and undercut them. They did all the hard work and were then stitched up by Apple. That’s when everyone discovered that Apple would undercut (and lose revenue) on hardware just to get the support. Bit like the printer manufacturers today, selling printers at a loss to rake in the profits on inks.
Specialist17
AskWoody LoungerI’m sorry, but I don’t understand the part about:
“Those of us working actively with our clients shouldn’t be subject to any competitor coming in and disrupting our business”
But why not? In this capitalistic, free-market loving America….I thought that was just “survival-of-the-fittest”, “fair game”, “disrupt to evolve”, and whatever other platitudes apply?
Unless there is a violation of a contract/service agreement that is going on here, then I don’t really get it. But I am not knowledgeable on this CSP/MSP topic.
-
Paul T
AskWoody MVP
Viewing 17 reply threads -

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Sexual Offender Review (Awaiting moderation)
by
allisonenyeart
37 minutes ago -
Unusual Article Uncovers The Deceptive Practices Of Roofing Company Chandler AZ (Awaiting moderation)
by
ginahoke6317
49 minutes ago -
Time-Tested Ways To Tv Shows Greece (Awaiting moderation)
by
denesewolff0
1 hour, 41 minutes ago -
MS Word functionality (Awaiting moderation)
by
Umar Farooq
2 hours, 6 minutes ago -
Woman in front of 2 mirrors. One shot 2 different reflections
by
Alex5723
4 hours, 38 minutes ago -
Steam drops macOS Mojave support, effectively ending life for many 32-bit games
by
Alex5723
6 hours, 25 minutes ago -
Requiring Bit-Locker key when it isnt activated after Win 11 update
by
BradH
1 hour, 54 minutes ago -
KB5032189 Not installing on either of my PCs
by
WSPseudoGeek
6 hours, 46 minutes ago -
Outlook.com – is there a way to delete all contacts in bulk?
by
Everard Tarascio
13 hours, 19 minutes ago -
Apple zero days fixed – November 30, 2023
by
Susan Bradley
13 hours, 5 minutes ago -
found a skneaky way to get windows 11 free still.
by
tjm1963
17 hours, 58 minutes ago -
Quickbooks – no new desktop subscriptions to be sold
by
Susan Bradley
20 hours, 29 minutes ago -
Does updating to Win10 from Win7 Retain your applications successfully?
by
WSMrKnobs
18 hours, 43 minutes ago -
Using Dropbox source data for a Connection in Excel with different machines
by
WSGfamily
22 hours, 3 minutes ago -
Microsoft installing HP Smart secretly on non HP PCs
by
Alex5723
20 hours, 58 minutes ago -
Fun Stuff – Mystery Zone
by
Lars220
1 day, 11 hours ago -
How to make sure GMAIL does not delete my account since they are not letting ..?
by
Gmail
9 hours, 23 minutes ago -
Windows Explorer – search for files that are not shortcuts?
by
edsel1924
1 day, 5 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 23595 released to DEV
by
joep517
1 day, 17 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26002 released to Canary
by
joep517
19 hours, 55 minutes ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 22635.2776 released to BETA
by
joep517
1 day, 17 hours ago -
Getting ‘not genuine Windows’ after replacing HDD
by
opti1
23 hours, 27 minutes ago -
Amazon Alexa Echo Hunches
by
Richard C Algeni
1 day, 18 hours ago -
Microsoft Defender Application Guard for Office is being deprecated
by
Alex5723
1 day, 19 hours ago -
New BLUFFS attack lets attackers hijack Bluetooth connections
by
Alex5723
1 day, 20 hours ago -
Don’t have your online identity in just one account
by
Susan Bradley
6 hours, 15 minutes ago -
Sports Illustrated Published Articles by Fake, AI-Generated Writers
by
Cybertooth
1 day, 15 hours ago -
Windows 32bit to 64bit.
by
David Rennie
22 hours, 39 minutes ago -
Lost icons in notification area, Windows 10
by
Botswana12
1 hour, 4 minutes ago -
Test Apps in vm(?) so that I don’t break my current install
by
ruffhi
17 hours, 11 minutes ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
31 |
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2023 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.