![]() |
MS-DEFCON 4:
There are isolated problems with current patches, but they are well-known and documented on this site.
|
-
Changes to policies
Home › Forums › AskWoody blog › Changes to policies
Tagged: Patch Lady Posts
- This topic has 28 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 1 week ago.
Viewing 12 reply threads-
AuthorPosts
-
-
February 21, 2021 at 12:05 pm #2345088
Susan Bradley
Manager“We are trying to build a gentler, kinder society, and if we all pitch in just a little bit, we are going to get there.” Alex Trebek said that in his
[See the full post at: Changes to policies]Susan Bradley Patch Lady
13 users thanked author for this post.
-
February 21, 2021 at 1:17 pm #2345104
anonymous
Guest-
February 21, 2021 at 8:03 pm #2345189
-
February 21, 2021 at 9:15 pm #2345203
OscarCP
AskWoody PlusFor my part, I have been always OK with Woody’s blogs celebrating some of the major religions festivities around the world. That never bothered me one little bit and I was often glad to add my own congratulations and comment favorably on the whole thing, even if I am not a religious person. To me such festivities are part of the wonderful side of the world I live in, a part of what adds spice to the life of the open and curious mind. Now “Net Neutrality”, “SolarWinds”, “Prizm” … those definitely bother me.
As to commenting on religion or politics as such — something quite different from sending congrats to people who celebrate a major religious festivity and are most likely also loungers in this international site — that is what “Rants” has been for. People who would rather not see or hear about religion or politics, or read about them, at last not at Woody’s, have always been entirely free to ignore “Rants” even exists. There has been nothing here that is going to grab and drag them against their will to see what is in there. Both religion and politics elsewhere, outside “Rants”, in this site always have been no-nos. I am also fine with that.
Windows 7 Professional, SP1, x64 Group W (ex B) & macOS Mojave + Linux (Mint)
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
February 21, 2021 at 9:57 pm #2345209
Cybertooth
AskWoody PlusThe problem, as I see it, is that even though political/ideological commentary has historically been formally limited to the Rants section (which I don’t remember ever visiting, and have no plans ever to visit), nevertheless sometimes such commentary still seeps into the rest of the site.
I spend a major chunk of each day making my way through political websites and I would like visiting Woody’s to be a respite from that.
So I welcome Susan’s policy change wholeheartedly.
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 5 days ago by
Cybertooth.
-
February 21, 2021 at 11:09 pm #2345219
OscarCP
AskWoody PlusCybertooth: If politics or religion “still seeps into the rest of the site“, that has nothing to do with “Rants.” Even if “Rants” were to be totally excised from AskWoody, that sort of commentary will still seep in as much as it does now, because not everyone here posting comments is careful or particularly cares about respecting the rules of the site, that forbid posting on religion or politics (at least until today) outside “Rants.” And because the moderators are only human and, therefore, not perfect at finding and removing every single inappropriate comment. So, no, “Rants” can stay or go and, either way, you shall still find, pretty much as frequently as heretofore, occasion to be put off by things you don’t care to see here.
And, according to my own experience, “Rants” has been rarely used by anyone to comment there on anything, compared to the other forums (I have been one of those to do so, so I know that), in the three plus years that I have been associated with AskWoody. In fact, I have started threads in “Rants” some times, simply because I was not sure where else they might belong and I suspected that they might be open to some controversy. So “Rants” is really something of a red herring here.
Windows 7 Professional, SP1, x64 Group W (ex B) & macOS Mojave + Linux (Mint)
-
February 22, 2021 at 12:14 am #2345222
Cybertooth
AskWoody PlusNo doubt there will continue to be those around here who yield to the temptation to express their views on politics or religion upon the rest who honor the request to keep to technical issues. But from a user’s perspective, a blanket policy against politics/religion anywhere in the forum is much clearer than what we have hitherto had, and as understanding of that intent spreads I would expect a decrease, over time, in the frequency of unsolicited political/religious opinions here.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
February 22, 2021 at 1:18 am #2345238
OscarCP
AskWoody PlusCybertooth: I respectfully disagree, because I am convinced that radically removing the ability to have in “Rants” rational and respectful discussions, on politics in particular (as are the ones you have not seen in “Rants” and have survived appropriate monitoring; there are no discussions on religion as such there) is not going to make one tiny bit of difference to you because of what you’ll find elsewhere. It will only make this site less interesting to those of us who don’t mind shooting the breeze on current events that are important to us, as citizens of this world, and like to throw them up there and see how they do against the criticism of informed others, in a place that has been set apart from the rest of this site expressly for this purpose.
Cutting off a discreetly conducted conversation in a separate space is not going to prevent in the least some people’s sensibilities from being offended when reading comments posted elsewhere. And that’s the pity of it.
Windows 7 Professional, SP1, x64 Group W (ex B) & macOS Mojave + Linux (Mint)
-
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 5 days ago by
-
-
-
February 21, 2021 at 1:25 pm #2345111
Susan Bradley
Manager -
February 21, 2021 at 1:39 pm #2345116
Microfix
AskWoody MVPPlease remember the home-users who frequent this site (mostly the subscribed members)
Some are in isolation/shielding and housebound due to the pandemic, then there is a question of mental wellbeing and it’s global like the members.
So to me, changing policy/rules at this time, is not a wise move and has the potential to enflame frustration, confuse members further and drift off elsewhere.. just my 2cents-
February 21, 2021 at 2:07 pm #2345120
Susan Bradley
ManagerThinking of home users/non business users is the exact reason why I made the change. I find myself wanting a politically free zone in my online interactions with other folks and especially because of the pandemic. It’s breaking apart families and that’s not a good thing.
Susan Bradley Patch Lady
8 users thanked author for this post.
-
February 21, 2021 at 6:53 pm #2345179
Cee Arr
AskWoody PlusI am definitely in the “drift off” category. I signed up 1. because of Woody and 2. for computer information. At present it’s nip and tuck as to whether I extend my paying membership. I’m finding less and less of interest and often can’t be bothered – period; I finding what I need elsewhere. Stay with computer stuff.
-
-
February 21, 2021 at 2:07 pm #2345119
-
February 21, 2021 at 2:07 pm #2345118
anonymous
GuestThe changing of policies is less of a problem for us then the sites blocking traffic from our VPN’s servers.
At this point, we are having to click through five or six of the VPN’s servers to get through to the site. It takes less than 30 seconds. We are sure that anyone trying to attack the site is doing the same.
Posting a political post is not a problem if we can not get through to the site.
And how do you separate politics from computer related issues.
Is Australia’s move to enact laws to charge Facebook for access to the Australasian market a computer relate or political issue?
-
February 21, 2021 at 2:09 pm #2345124
Susan Bradley
Manager-
February 21, 2021 at 2:23 pm #2345129
-
February 21, 2021 at 2:23 pm #2345130
anonymous
Guest-
February 21, 2021 at 2:53 pm #2345145
Susan Bradley
Manager
-
-
-
-
February 21, 2021 at 2:49 pm #2345138
anonymous
GuestPlease clarify, will discussions related to Facebook and Googles’ activities in Australia be a political or computer related discussion?
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/02/19/tech/facebook-australia-global-backlash/index.html
Will topics like this be blocked?
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
February 21, 2021 at 2:51 pm #2345143
Susan Bradley
Manager“Sometimes we will have articles that deal with real-life issues that affect us all, such as the intersection of law and technology. Such topics can easily slip into a political discussion but we ask that your commentary remains polite, respectful, unbiased, and factual. That sort of commentary is to be encouraged”
There will be topics that have political influence, but I’d like to keep away from a blame game of one side or the other. Does that help?
Susan Bradley Patch Lady
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
February 21, 2021 at 5:45 pm #2345173
OscarCP
AskWoody PlusSusan: ” but I’d like to keep away from a blame game of one side or the other. ”
If politician x does something wicked that is firmly and publicly approved of by his or her own political party because, among other reasons, it is in agreement with said party position on the matter, is mentioning this fact playing “a blame game?”
Or, to phrase it differently: Things are always more complicated than they seem.
Windows 7 Professional, SP1, x64 Group W (ex B) & macOS Mojave + Linux (Mint)
-
February 22, 2021 at 1:03 pm #2345494
rick41
AskWoody LoungerWhat you assume to be “wicked” may be someone else’s “virtuous” or “part good, part bad.” That kind of potential polarization — which is more prevalent today than in years — is why this site needs to try to steer clear of politics. There are an endless number of alternate arenas for discussing political issues.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
-
February 21, 2021 at 2:52 pm #2345144
Geo
AskWoody PlusEdit item 1. No personal attacks. Then lists political and religion. It’s repetitive with item 3 now listed.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
February 21, 2021 at 6:07 pm #2345176
-
-
February 21, 2021 at 4:26 pm #2345165
-
February 21, 2021 at 4:57 pm #2345167
OscarCP
AskWoody PlusSusan: How are things going with the “Catalina Rules” to ensure fair moderating? One of which is explaining to the lounger why a comment has been deleted and allowing for some kind of appeal process (which doubtless would need some imaginative work to make it a practical proposition here; not a simple thing to do well). I understood you were working on that. As you know, I have had a number of comments deleted without any reason clear to me, particularly disturbing a few happening in “Fun Stuff”, that I am convinced were none of the things that the modified rules (and also the old ones) define as a cause for editing or deletion.
As to “Rants”: Sometimes it is very difficult or even impossible to separate technological issues from matters of policy (consider Internet Neutrality) and, sometimes, from these and politics. That is because we all live in the same real world where all things are connected in innumerable ways. That does not mean that politics must inevitably enter in any topic under discussion, far from it. But it is a fact that determining if a comment is “political” and therefore must be deleted, or not is a matter open to interpretation by whomever chances to be the moderator. Moderators are people, so they have their own biases and prejudices. So I think that leaving the “Rants” forum as it has been until now would be wise. Except for personal attacks, if things get heated or some troll intervenes cloaked in anonymity.
Now, when it comes to religion: If, let’s say, I chose to emphasize something with a citation to one of the well-known Psalms, or to Ecclesiasticus, is that banned? The Psalms and other parts of various scriptures (consider the Bhagavad Ghita) are a pervasive part of universal culture and its wisdom, as much as the basic ideas behind the Internet. Making such citations is not the same as proselytizing (or attacking) a religious creed, something that I would consider as unacceptable in most places not concerned primarily with that particular creed.
I am all for stopping in its tracks any exchange that turns personal, although if someone who is not making provocative comments is attacked by someone else out of the blue, it is only the attacking comment that should go, to be fair.
I think that banning anything that can be connected to politics or religion is using too blunt a tool.
So, perhaps, some further clarification of how the changes to “Rants” are meant to work would be much appreciated.
Windows 7 Professional, SP1, x64 Group W (ex B) & macOS Mojave + Linux (Mint)
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 5 days ago by
OscarCP.
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 5 days ago by
-
February 21, 2021 at 5:37 pm #2345172
-
February 22, 2021 at 1:40 pm #2345506
Charlie
AskWoody PlusI would like to compliment Woody and the AskWoody site for being a place where I can communicate with mostly very intelligent people about things that are of interest to me.
This is a time in history when it’s hard to talk with my neighbors and even my own family members without the conversation getting immersed in politics and sometimes religion. It’s so nice to come here to AskWoody and not have to worry about that.
Way to go Woody, the pleasant environment here is most appreciated, at least by me.
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
February 26, 2021 at 1:43 pm #2346476
KP
AskWoody PlusTo keep religious and political rants off this site, how about this suggestion.
Politics and Rant Section:
– single post with topic only
– no replies allowed
– single link to non-AskWoody site where people can rant as they please
– banned material could be moved to the Politics and Rant SectionI am not familiar with sites which allow this type of content. I have heard about the ones in the news, after Twitter shutdown the recent high-profile account but never visited myself to see what it is like.
I am not sure how workable this is as a compromise solution; The other side of this is, it might be too much work to implement. However it give a small voice to go and discuss it somewhere.
Politics and Rant Section would be similar to a Junk Folder.
-
-
AuthorPosts
Viewing 12 reply threads -
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments. Click here for details and to sign up.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
Recent Replies
anonymous on Getting ready for upgrade to 20H2
15 minutes agoanonymous on Getting ready for upgrade to 20H2
16 minutes agoSusan Bradley on Do you still patch on premises Exchange servers?
24 minutes agoanonymous on kb4601319 strange issue after updating
32 minutes agoTom on Do you still patch on premises Exchange servers?
2 hours, 9 minutes agompw on Getting ready for upgrade to 20H2
2 hours, 31 minutes agoBob99 on Getting ready for upgrade to 20H2
2 hours, 49 minutes agoBob99 on MS-DEFCON 4 – February updates trigger few issues
3 hours, 4 minutes agoMatador on MS-DEFCON 4 – February updates trigger few issues
3 hours, 24 minutes agompw on Getting ready for upgrade to 20H2
3 hours, 24 minutes agoSusan Bradley on Microsoft Security Response Center
3 hours, 33 minutes agoanonymous on 117 patches for GRUB2
3 hours, 35 minutes agoBob99 on MS-DEFCON 4 – February updates trigger few issues
3 hours, 40 minutes agoBob99 on ‘System’ reports high CPU
4 hours, 4 minutes agokrism on Getting ready for upgrade to 20H2
4 hours, 11 minutes agoareader on Free-form database wanted
5 hours, 59 minutes ago280park on MS-DEFCON 4 – February updates trigger few issues
6 hours, 31 minutes agokrism on Battery, Power Management Questions
6 hours, 40 minutes agompw on Getting ready for upgrade to 20H2
7 hours, 2 minutes agob on Do you still patch on premises Exchange servers?
7 hours, 8 minutes agodg1261 on Free-form database wanted
7 hours, 23 minutes agoCasey H on Find & Replace
7 hours, 28 minutes agoareader on Free-form database wanted
7 hours, 31 minutes agoJohn on ‘System’ reports high CPU
7 hours, 32 minutes agompw on Annual dates do not display in outlook calendar
7 hours, 33 minutes agoPaulK on Free-form database wanted
7 hours, 40 minutes agoCasey H on Find & Replace
7 hours, 43 minutes agoCharlie on 117 patches for GRUB2
7 hours, 46 minutes agoLHiggins on Battery, Power Management Questions
7 hours, 52 minutes agorebop2020 on Unable to update Win10 v1909 since Build 18363.657
8 hours, 4 minutes ago
Recent Topics
-
Telemetry
19 minutes ago
-
Microsoft Security Response Center
3 hours, 34 minutes ago
-
SRU and SRUDB
11 hours ago
-
‘System’ reports high CPU
4 hours, 5 minutes ago
-
AI generated play
16 hours, 35 minutes ago
-
Square buying streaming music service Tidal
19 hours, 46 minutes ago
-
LibreOffice updates.
18 hours, 16 minutes ago
-
Free-form database wanted
6 hours ago
-
LinkedIn will stop collecting IDFA data on iOS
10 hours, 26 minutes ago
-
February Update 20H2 – Telemetry changes
8 hours, 28 minutes ago
-
KB4603002 – Feb 2021 Patch for .Net Framework.
1 day, 13 hours ago
-
reboot takes forever, normal boot from off is quick
11 hours, 28 minutes ago
-
Windows 10 Insider Preview build 21327 released to DEV Channel
2 days, 3 hours ago
-
Using IFS function and BETWEEN condition
2 days, 4 hours ago
-
OS upgrade
1 day, 22 hours ago
-
Microsoft.Windows.Remediation failed to start
12 hours, 51 minutes ago
-
117 patches for GRUB2
3 hours, 35 minutes ago
-
Google says it will stop selling ads based on people’s browsing histories
2 days, 6 hours ago
-
Stuck updates
1 day, 15 hours ago
-
Battery, Power Management Questions
6 hours, 41 minutes ago
-
Avatar
1 day, 18 hours ago
-
Apple may disable Rosetta 2 on M1 in some regions
2 days, 21 hours ago
-
March 2021 Office non-Security Updates are now available
1 day, 2 hours ago
-
Windows 10 clean install
2 days, 3 hours ago
-
Do you still patch on premises Exchange servers?
24 minutes ago
-
Files appearing in Recycle Bin Windows 10 version 1909
2 days, 17 hours ago
-
Outlook won’t open (or any app withing Office 2019 professional plus
2 days, 13 hours ago
-
The Perseverance rover runs on processors used in iMacs in the 1990s
2 days, 7 hours ago
-
UEFI
3 days, 10 hours ago
-
Just discovered CCleaner wiped my history!
2 days, 10 hours ago
Search for Topics
Recent blog posts
- March 2021 Office non-Security Updates are now available
- Do you still patch on premises Exchange servers?
- “Stuttering” glitch on a brand-new PC
- Here’s looking at you, kid: the child-cam scam
- The best things in life are copyrighted
- Using Microsoft OneDrive on your Android device
- MS-DEFCON 4 – February updates trigger few issues
- Temporarily putting the site in maintenance mode
Key Links
Copyright © 2004 – 2021 AskWoody Tech LLC. All rights reserved.