June 2020 Patch Tuesday rolls out

Topic

New Reply

…. and …. they’re off … We have cumulative updates for Win10 Win 10 version 2004 – KB4557957 – https://support.microsoft.com/help/4557957 Win 10
[See the full post at: June 2020 Patch Tuesday rolls out]

7 users thanked author for this post.

Mr. Natural, Fred, jburk07, geekdom, abbodi86, Microfix, Elly

Reply | Quote

Replies

AKB 2000003 has been updated for Group B Win7 (ESU) and Win8.1 on June. 9, 2020.

There are Security-only and IE11 Cumulative Updates for those with Win7 ESU subscriptions.
June Rollup KB4561643 Download 32-bit or 64-bit for those with Win7 ESU subscriptions.
You must have May Servicing Stack KB4555449 previously installed to receive these updates)

There is also a new  June Servicing Stack KB4562030. Download 32-bit or 64-bit for those with Win7 ESU subscriptions.

There is also a new  June Servicing Stack KB4562253  Download 32-bit or 64-bit for Win8.1
And an IE11 Adobe Flash Player update KB4561600 Download 32-bit or 64-bit for Win8.1

There is also a revised Licensing Preparation Package KB4538483 dated 5/5/2020 for Win7 ESU subscriptions.

10 users thanked author for this post.

pandarunnerpt, HiFlyer, Nibbled To Death By Ducks, SueW, jburk07, DrBonzo, abbodi86, Microfix, Elly, woody

Reply | Quote

Windows 1909 TestBeta
June 9, 2020

2020-06 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems (KB4560960)

2020-06 Security Update for Adobe Flash Player for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems (KB4561600)

Installed updates from Windows Update and then rebooted without error.

Screenshot while installing has been included:

On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender

2 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, Elly

Reply | Quote

Addendum: Blue Screen of Death this morning while bringing up Firefox. I’m not sure if this is a one-off problem or continuing problem yet.

On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender

3 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, RTEsysadmin, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

This BSOD was a single instance and not a consistent problem.

On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender

3 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, RTEsysadmin, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

As usual Windows 7 is the most secure OS with just 3 critical and 27 important
vs 1903, 1909 (2004 ?) with 6 critical and 73 important.

3 users thanked author for this post.

AmbularD, Nibbled To Death By Ducks, Charlie

Reply | Quote

Alex5723 wrote:

As usual Windows 7 is the most secure OS with just 3 critical and 27 important

The number of patches required to keep a 10-year-old OS long out of development/support struggling along has zero relevance to its security today compared with modern systems.

Windows 11 Pro version 22H2 build 22621.2361 + Microsoft 365 + Edge

1 user thanked author for this post.

RTEsysadmin

Reply | Quote

KB4557957 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems
KB4561600 Security Update for Adobe Flash Player for Windows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems

Installed without hiccups, although after reboot I was presented with the Privacy screen one normally would see after a major update or clean install.  All of my original selections, “No”, were still intact.  I also checked with O&O Shutup10 and no changes were made.

Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!

We were all once "Average Users". We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems, we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.

Computer Specs

1 user thanked author for this post.

jburk07

Reply | Quote

bbearren wrote:

KB4557957 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems
KB4561600 Security Update for Adobe Flash Player for Windows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems

Installed without hiccups, although after reboot I was presented with the Privacy screen one normally would see after a major update or clean install.  All of my original selections, “No”, were still intact.  I also checked with O&O Shutup10 and no changes were made.

Deferrals settings are back in 2004 ?

Reply | Quote

The deferral GUI (in Pro) is gone, the Group Policies have changed, but apparently the Registry settings still work.

2 users thanked author for this post.

mcbsys, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

Still not there.

GPOs:

Select when Quality Updates are received

Select when Preview Builds and Feature Updates are received

Still working.

New:

Select the target Feature Update version

Reply | Quote

I’d like to know more about this change in GUI & Group Policies- which versions?

Reply | Quote

The question and answer were about version 2004.

Windows 11 Pro version 22H2 build 22621.2361 + Microsoft 365 + Edge

Reply | Quote

Alex5723 wrote:

Deferrals settings are back in 2004 ?

I can’t speak to that, as I don’t use deferrals or pause.  The only constraint I put on Windows Update is driver updates, via Group Policy.

Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!

We were all once "Average Users". We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems, we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.

Computer Specs

Reply | Quote

bbearren wrote:

Installed without hiccups, although after reboot I was presented with the Privacy screen one normally would see after a major update or clean install.

That’s controlled by Settings, System, Notifications & actions, Show me the Windows welcome experience after updates and occasionally when I sign in to highlight what’s new and suggested.

Windows 11 Pro version 22H2 build 22621.2361 + Microsoft 365 + Edge

1 user thanked author for this post.

SkipH

Reply | Quote

b wrote:

That’s controlled by Settings, System, Notifications & actions, Show me the Windows welcome experience after updates and occasionally when I sign in to highlight what’s new and suggested.

“Suggest ways I can finish setting up my device to get the most out of Windows” had a check in the box. I un-checked that many updates ago, but I just un-checked it again.

I wouldn’t classify that as an issue, however.

Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!

We were all once "Average Users". We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems, we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.

Computer Specs

Reply | Quote

Installed without hiccups, although after reboot I was presented with the Privacy screen one normally would see after a major update or clean install.

I also got the privacy screen and some sort of OLE prompt (should’ve read the latter more carefully). Pretty bizarre, not sure if it was meant for after this cumulative update or if there was some issue preventing it from running after the feature update.

I guess someone would have to clean install 2004 and then install KB4557957 to find out.

Reply | Quote

[bbearren]

My NAS got the same two updates, only pushed.  No hiccups.  Active hours for my NAS are 6:30AM to 3:00PM.  Both sides of my laptop are updated as well, no hiccups there, either.

All that’s left is the B side of my desktop, which I’m gonna do shortly.

>>>edit – Side B updated, all is well with five various installations.  I saw the blue Privacy selections screen from “Suggest ways I can finish setting up my device to get the most out of Windows” getting checked during the update on the B side of my laptop and both sides of my desktop.  It didn’t happen on my NAS, even though that one was pushed and I didn’t watch it.  When I RDP’d into it to check, it signed in straight to the desktop with nothing in between, not even the “Hi”.  /edit<<<

Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!

We were all once "Average Users". We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems, we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.

Computer Specs

• This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by bbearren. Reason: clarity
• This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by bbearren.

Reply | Quote

b wrote:

Alex5723 wrote:

As usual Windows 7 is the most secure OS with just 3 critical and 27 important

The number of patches required to keep a 10-year-old OS long out of development/support struggling along has zero relevance to its security today compared with modern systems.

Windows 7 is supported by Microsoft for additional 3 years, so yes, the number of security holes count.

7 users thanked author for this post.

AmbularD, Moonbear, lanceboil, Nibbled To Death By Ducks, SueW, Cybertooth, samak

Reply | Quote

[Alex5723]

woody wrote:

The deferral GUI (in Pro) is gone, the Group Policies have changed, but apparently the Registry settings still work.

Any reference in Microsoft’s documentations for the disappearance the deferral GUI ?
This doesn’t appear on the list of removed/deprecated features.

https://www.ghacks.net/2020/05/30/removed-deprecated-windows-10-2004/

• This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by Alex5723.

2 users thanked author for this post.

mcbsys, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

So far, all I have is observation on working 2004 systems.

We won’t really know what’s going on until somebody has a chance to test the Registry settings against the real-world releases – and that’s going to take some time.

2 users thanked author for this post.

mcbsys, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

I spotted a new WU Detectoid to detect IE adobe flash, even in Windows 7 (which doesn’t get it via WU)

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Macromedia\FlashPlayerActiveX]  

"AdobeFlashPlayerInstalled"=dword:00000001

what’s weird is that i cannot find reference for that registry value anywhere

3 users thanked author for this post.

Microfix, DrBonzo, woody

Reply | Quote

In WSUS it’s called “Block Flash updates for non-MS Flash Player”

1 user thanked author for this post.

Kirsty

Reply | Quote

I really hope Microsoft plans on removing and discontinuing flash at the end of this year…..as it should be.

Red Ruffnsore

Reply | Quote

Microsoft announced that three years ago:

We will phase out Flash from Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer, culminating in the removal of Flash from Windows entirely by the end of 2020.
…
By the end of 2020, we will remove the ability to run Adobe Flash in Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer across all supported versions of Microsoft Windows. Users will no longer have any ability to enable or run Flash.

This timeline is consistent across browsers, including Google, Mozilla, and Apple.

The End of an Era – Next Steps for Adobe Flash

And clarified their plan (regarding Chromium) last year:

We still plan to fully remove Flash from these browsers by December 2020, as originally communicated.

Update on removing Flash from Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer

Windows 11 Pro version 22H2 build 22621.2361 + Microsoft 365 + Edge

1 user thanked author for this post.

Mr. Natural

Reply | Quote

I’d say there are a few, shall we say “cynical types”, that wonder if the planned phasing-out of Flash will actually happen at the time it has been slated to…
🙂

Reply | Quote

Good Day,

 

So is Windows 2004 still a feature update or does it appear in the mandatory downloads?

Win 10 Home 22H2

Reply | Quote

Everything I’ve seen corresponds to what I published in Computerworld a few weeks ago –

https://www.computerworld.com/article/3232632/how-to-block-the-windows-10-may-2020-update-version-2004-from-installing.html

The only exception I’ve seen is this behavior – which we still haven’t run down, far as I can tell – that may be a bug in how 1903 and 1909 “unPauses.”

3 users thanked author for this post.

abbodi86, geekdom, Win7and10

Reply | Quote

For those who don’t get updates for Adobe Flash Player automatically, there is a security update that addresses a critical vulnerability. “Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user.”
The update takes you to version 32.0.0.387

Windows 10 Home 22H2, Acer Aspire TC-1660 desktop + LibreOffice, non-techie

4 users thanked author for this post.

SueW, jburk07, Microfix, DrBonzo

Reply | Quote

Microsoft fixes the Windows 10 May 2020 Update for Surface Pro 7 and Surface Laptop 3

“The fix rolled out as part of today’s round of Patch Tuesday updates, so if you’re on build 19041.329, you’ve got the fix. Of course, if your machine was susceptible to the issue, you were likely never offered the update in the first place, since there was a compatibility hold.

Unfortunately, that hold still isn’t being lifted, so if you’re on Windows 10 version 1909, you still won’t see version 2004 in Windows Update. …”

https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-fixes-the-windows-10-may-2020-update-for-surface-pro-7-and-surface-laptop-3

Catch 22 ?

Reply | Quote

Windows 8.1 Pro x64 (June 2020 Patches)
kb4561666 SMQR June 2020, kb4561600 Flash Player security update and kb4562253 Service Stack all installed without errors in event viewer.
(I always request a restart after SSU patch, personal preference)

Computer Management Local Post Patch Checks:
Performance> Data Collector Sets> Startup Event Trace Sessions to find..

Diagtrack and SQM logger still not enabled.(thanks abbodi86)
then checked Performance> Data Collector Sets> Event Trace Sessions..no changes.

Task Scheduler Checks…no changes.
Checked attached printer, still present and operational in Devices and Printers
All current CVE holes plugged, flash player still disabled due to having more holes than a tea bag.

No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created IT- AE

2 users thanked author for this post.

DrBonzo, PKCano

Reply | Quote

Ironic that KB4562253 showed no errors in event viewer… because on the Server 2012 R2 standard servers that inadvertently got this update, any MMC that wants to launch a particular type of view will want to open the view in an external program.

It first manifested for me with Event Viewer using the Details tab.  I’ll bet you didn’t have to open a details tab.

The problem also manifests with the Services MMC.

It happens on all servers with that update, and does not happen on any without that update.

I would put a big-**** “DEFER” with exclamation points on that servicing stack update.

Moderator edit: Language

Reply | Quote

Update – It looks on Server 2012 R2, KB4562253 hosed Internet Explorer 11 settings to an extreme degree.  Can’t open inetcpl.cpl.  Can’t open a web page – it wants the page downloaded.

 

Reply | Quote

Followup:

It appears that although there was no approval for the servicing stack update, it installed itself outside of our patch management system.   Because of that, co-dependent updates did not also install.

Because there appears to be a link between the servicing stack update, the security only/quality updates (whichever one you choose) and the Internet Explorer 11 cumulative security update – and there’s a disclaimer in the security only/quality update KB article saying to make sure to install the latest IE 11 update – I’m guessing that whatever the servicing stack changed that borked IE11 has a corresponding fix in the IE11 cumulative update.  At least I hope that’s the case.

The kicker: Windows Update scan did not detect that the IE11 cumulative update for June was a needed update!  Is this another one that is only showing up in the Windows Update Catalog?   So much for automating patch updates…

I will post back with a status on the borked IE condition.

Regardless, I’m a tad concerned that Microsoft changed things for Server 2012 R2 to make it more like Win10, where Microsoft decides when to apply updates for you.  Has anyone else had an issue with Servicing Stack updates installing themselves, even though the status for that patch has not been set to “approved for install?”

Reply | Quote

Update:

Applying the June IE Security Cumulative Update fixed the IE borkage wrought by the self-applied and unrequested/not-approved June servicing stack update.

If someone’s got the same thing – IE fails to load into embedded forms in MMC, won’t launch a web page and won’t let you into the internet control panel, check to see if the servicing stack update ran without permission or notice.  If so, go to the windows update catalog server and locate the latest IE security cumulative update, and install it.

 

 

Reply | Quote

On components level, the ESU preparation update KB4538483 is superseded by this month rollup update KB4561643 or security only KB4561669
just a technical note 🙂

KB4538483 is still required by WU to offer ESU updates

Reply | Quote

[Fred]

woody wrote:

…. and …. they’re off … We have cumulative updates for Win10 Win 10 version 2004 – KB4557957 – https://support.microsoft.com/help/4557957 Win 10
[See the full post at: June 2020 Patch Tuesday rolls out]

Win10 Pro NL 64b versions 1909 – KB 4560960.  did this update manually; put me up to version 18363.900
Beats me what exactly has been improved, no blue screens yet.
Perhaps the interference with the HP-Windows_Graphic drivers will be less ? who can tell?

* _ the metaverse is poisonous _ *

• This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by Fred.

Reply | Quote

Did you also get the June SSU for 1909? KB4560959

1 user thanked author for this post.

Fred

Reply | Quote

[Fred]

PKCano wrote:

KB4560959

thanks for reminding ! & done 🙂

* _ the metaverse is poisonous _ *

• This reply was modified 3 years, 3 months ago by Fred.

Reply | Quote

I love MS.

Just upgrade your servers, that’ll fix it.

https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/ADV200009

Reply | Quote

Win7 June update isn’t showing up for me. I have valid ESU license. All prior months showed up just fine.

Reply | Quote

Be sure you have the May Servicing Stack installed (linked in #2270882 ). It is a prerequisite for the the June patches.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Fred

Reply | Quote

Thanks, the May SSU didn’t show up in windows update and I had to install it manually. The June rollup shows up now.

Reply | Quote

I accepted and installed the KB4560960 cumulative update last night, along with the Adobe Flash Player update and the virus definitions update, on an HP Omen Intel core i7 7700 laptop with 8 GB ram running version 1909, bringing the build number up to 900. So far, the only problem I’ve seen is with Edge, which I occasionally play with for amusement. Most of the websites load as normal from my bookmarked favorites list; but a few would no longer load. The weather channel’s website (weather.com) struggles to load and then gives up, leaving the viewed page from the most recently loaded webpage on the screen but the weather channel’s url in the address bar ( https://weather.com/weather/today/l/283ac7f0a0440adf364edbf20a00ece98d69edaf69c245489c5fb85e06af8cc1 ). Another webpage for current covid-19 infection data for my county utterly fails to load, instead producing an error message I’ve never seen before and didn’t capture or preserve. Other webpages also simply failed to load and left the last viewed page on the screen with no comment or error message. All of these webpages loaded quickly and normally in the chrome browser on the same laptop (the browser I normally use).

 

1 user thanked author for this post.

woody

Reply | Quote

Have you installed the new Chromium-based version of Edge, KB 4541302 ?

See https://www.askwoody.com/2020/kb-4541302-the-new-chromium-based-version-of-edge-is-coming/

Reply | Quote

No, not yet; I haven’t seen it offered through windows update on my machine.

 

Reply | Quote

Yes, I have.  It is running with no problems so far (been 3 months) and am very happy with it.  On a Windows Acer Desktop runing Win 10 Home 64X Chromium Version 83.0.478.45 (Official build) (64-bit)

Rick U.

BC, Canada.

Reply | Quote

With several Images ready I removed the 2004 (Home ver) Block and June’s CU Install started automatically – Including KB4560959 JUNE SSU (my SSU installs ONLY Show in Control Panel Inst’d Updates, nowhere else).  Re-established the 2004 Block and All is Well!

W10 Pro 22H2 / Hm-Stdnt Ofce '16 C2R / HP Envy Desk-Ethernet - SSD-HDD/ i5(8th Gen) 12GB / GP=2 + FtrU=Semi-Annual + Feature Defer = 1 + QU=0

Reply | Quote

1909 Pro
Just now I did Check for updates, immediately they downloaded and installed — was it not spozed to prompt first?

1 user thanked author for this post.

rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

What installed? 2004?
What deferral settings did you have in place?
Have you reverted to 1909 or are you going to keep 2004?

cheers, Paul

Reply | Quote

KB4560960 installed on my system his morning and completely wiped out my desktop and most of my settings.  I had to roll back the update to get back to functionality.  Has anyone else had this issue?

1 user thanked author for this post.

rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

Mad_Rabbit wrote:

KB4560960 installed on my system his morning and completely wiped out my desktop and most of my settings.  I had to roll back the update to get back to functionality.  Has anyone else had this issue?

Microsoft creating a temp user bug is months old and haven’t been acknowledged or fixed by Microsoft.

https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/48012-fix-youve-been-signed-temporary-profile-windows-10-a.html

3 users thanked author for this post.

Elly, woody, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

Hi I had a similar experience, yesterday, when I installed the patch, and the system went to restart, it never got past the splash screen of the BIOS. I tried to uninstall, no luck, I tried rolling back, no luck, finally, I went to a system image I made last week and that worked. Then when I got back into the system, the patch was still there waiting for me. With trepidation, I let Windows do it’s thing, and the patch installed properly.

Regards

Bob Dunkley

2 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

A little detail… the installer creates a temporary user profile. Normally when the system reboots, it cleans up the temporary profile and brings back your old one. In some cases – I still don’t know when or why or how – the installer slips up (likely a race condition) and plops you into the temporary profile.

Tenforums has a thorough discussion of the problem and multiple solutions. Best advice is to re-boot six or eight times, and your old profile will probably come back. If you follow my instructions for installing updates, on Computerworld, there are details.

MS hasn’t acknowledged the bug, although I (and many others) have been kvetching about it for months.

2 users thanked author for this post.

rontpxz81, Elly

Reply | Quote

I had that happen on a couple pc’s back in February or March but haven’t come across it since.

As far as the “you have been logged in with a temporary profile” we’ve had that occasionally with random users for years. A very simple fix that worked every time in that case was I told the user to log off (not reboot) and then log back on and their profile loaded normally every time. A reboot would result in the same problem with no solution. Log off, not reboot. In that case I always thought it was network related.

It’s really important for everyone to know that if your normal profile does not load, do not panic. All your stuff is still on the pc and intact. It will be stored in one of two places. The Users folder with your usual login name or if a Windows version update was involved it could also possibly be in the Windows Old folder.

I’ve never seen data loss occur from a lost profile. It’s there somewhere.

Red Ruffnsore

2 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

BTW – If you’re a home user wondering where is my option to log off? Try right clicking your start button (or whatever they call it now) and you should see additional shutdown options including “log off” or “sign out” .

Red Ruffnsore

Reply | Quote

In other articles I’ve read, a simple reboot(s) may not solve the problem.  In some cases this complex procedure was necessary- a bit too much for my skills- so I hide the update and take my chances mot having it.

https://www.tenforums.com/tutorials/48012-fix-youve-been-signed-temporary-profile-windows-10-a.html

Reply | Quote

What installed?

Regardless of the what, should it (WU of 1909) not have prompted?

What deferral settings

The only available download /installation deferral of which I have any knowledge is to Pause;  and we have to Resume (remove the pause) in order to Check.

(In answer to what installed:  June cumulative, dotnet cumulative, flash, a noncumulative for 1909

Reply | Quote

Ok, in Settings I notice “except when….”.
So, flash player is “required to keep Windows running smoothly”, eh.
Now I doubt that WU ever will prompt for anything.

Reply | Quote

carpintero wrote:

In answer to what installed:  June cumulative

Windows updates do not prompt and as you clicked Check for updates that is what I would expect to happen.

What we don’t expect is the 2004 update to install without prompting.

cheers, Paul

1 user thanked author for this post.

carpintero

Reply | Quote

Windows updates do not prompt

Thanks, Paul.
(Given the statement in Settings,
it reasonable that one might have thought otherwise.)

Reply | Quote

That applies to feature updates (1909 to 2004 etc) not to security updates. They are “required to keep Windows running smoothly”.

cheers, Paul

Reply | Quote

carpintero wrote:

Regardless of the what, should it (WU of 1909) not have prompted?

https://www.askwoody.com/2020/further-evidence-of-forced-upgrade-to-win10-version-2004-possibly-due-to-a-pause-updates-bug/

Reply | Quote

….and just like in May, 2020-05 Security and Quality Rollup for .NET Framework 3.5.1, 4.5.2, 4.6, 4.6.1, 4.6.2, 4.7, 4.7.1, 4.7.2, 4.8 for Windows 7 for x64 (KB4556399) still shows unchecked after everything prerequisite has been installed.

Susan, anyone have any intel about why this might be?

(cross-thread post https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/may-net-kb4556399-update-successful-but-installed-updates-show-another-kb/#post-2271356)

Win7 Pro SP1 64-bit, Dell Latitude E6330, Intel CORE i5 "Ivy Bridge", 12GB RAM, Group "0Patch", Multiple Air-Gapped backup drives in different locations. Linux Mint Greenhorn
--
"Windows Update? Bah! I could carve a better ecosystem out of a banana!" -Jamrach Holobom

Reply | Quote

Is it too early for a general error report?

On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender

Reply | Quote

More information on Cumulative Updates:

https://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/all/cumulative-updates-june-9th-2020/45a8a7f3-cb89-459e-acf1-32d9de15c099

On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender

1 user thanked author for this post.

rontpxz81

Reply | Quote

Reading through all of the user comments, the June 2020 cumulative update seems like a mess.

Reply | Quote

It took them 8 years to document this behavior 🙂

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4564934/windows-may-send-dns-requests-that-appear-to-be-random-after-startup-o

3 users thanked author for this post.

Sueska, Elly, Microfix

Reply | Quote

@abbodi86 Thank you for your post. It helped me solve an odd problem with my Win 7 wired network icon showing no internet connectivity (yellow !) even though it actually had internet access. Turned out that SpybotAntibeacon with optional extensive telemetry hosts enabled, blocked msftncsi.com. There was also an warning in my event log of not being able to reach dns.msftncsi.com. Once msftncsi.com and http://www.msftncsi.com were remmed out in the host file, all went back to normal. Credit to the website for identifying msftncsi.com
https://blog.superuser.com/2011/05/16/windows-7-network-awareness/
by nhinkle StackExchange Superuser community blog

Reply | Quote

Wonder how long this privilege escalation has been going for?

No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created IT- AE

Reply | Quote

Probably five years or so, but there was no risk. The worst that could have happened was, if an administrator set diagnostic data (telemetry) to full then a standard user could change it to basic; and Microsoft told the discovering researcher that was by design, so it’s not changed by this week’s security patches.

The only thing Microsoft fixed was to prevent a standard user from switching to full diagnostics data after an administrator has set it to basic, which Microsoft classified as an “Information Disclosure” and NOT a privilege escalation (and that required both an administrator and standard user to be signed in at the same time).

It’s much ado about nothing:

An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause additional diagnostic data from the affected device to be sent to Microsoft.

To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to log on to an affected system and interact with the Windows Diagnostics & feedback Settings app.

CVE-2020-1296 | Windows Diagnostics & feedback Information Disclosure Vulnerability

Windows 11 Pro version 22H2 build 22621.2361 + Microsoft 365 + Edge

Reply | Quote

Win 10 1909 64 bit.   Downloaded June update KB4560960 from MS Update Catalog, standalone installed OK, system stable for 3 days.

1 user thanked author for this post.

jburk07

Reply | Quote

oh woody

that KB4023057 update is back – recently revised June 16, 2020:
https://support.microsoft.com/help/4023057/

block/hide this newly revised KB4023057 update with wushowhide.diagcab

Reply | Quote

Has anyone noticed the latest Skype app update has Interfered with Windows search.

IT remains open when using cmd or PowerShell as administrator.It also mesisis with cmd or PowerShell after you manually close search by clicking on the descktop.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Fred

Reply | Quote

anonymous wrote:

Has anyone noticed the latest Skype app update has Interfered with Windows search.

IT remains open when using cmd or PowerShell as administrator.It also mesisis with cmd or PowerShell after you manually close search by clicking on the descktop.

Yes!  I wrote earlier, that wasn’t allowed and therefor erased: it all comes together. Big data is like dollars, once one has got some they want more! It all for collecting metadata from the crowd. In the EU M1cros0ft was given a penalty for snooping around (GDPR) with Windows10 & Office365

* _ the metaverse is poisonous _ *

Reply | Quote

Is there any way I can obtain remote help for my desktop Lenovo with Windows 10?

Many of my saved photos, now appear as icons and not thumbnails, and although I’ve read and followed directions online to change the view to thumbnails, I have had no success.

Any suggestions?

Reply | Quote

I suggest you open a new topic under the Windows 10 section as your problem isn’t really about the June patches.

cheers, Paul

Reply | Quote

@Maivisin –

I posted on your behalf. See here:

https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/saved-photos-appear-as-icons-not-thumbnails/#post-2277836

1 user thanked author for this post.

Elly

Reply | Quote

I cannot get KB4561600 to install on my Windows 2012 R2 server, period.  Can’t install it manually, can’t do it from WU, can’t do it from WSUS, just fails every time.  Anyone else having this issue? 
THis is the 2020-06 Security Update for Adobe Flash PLayer in IE11.  I even tried downloading the latest flash player for IE and installing that and that failed too.

Reply | Quote

Have you read the “Important” section of the following?

https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4561600/security-update-for-adobe-flash-player

In particular the fact that you need KB2919355 as a prerequisite. You may also need the latest SSU KB4562253 (https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4562253 )

Reply | Quote