And the situation’s becoming more dire as MS uses Win10 techniques in Win7 and 8.1. InfoWorld Woody on Windows
[See the full post at: Microsoft walks a thin line between Windows 10 telemetry and snooping]
![]() |
Patch reliability is unclear. Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
Microsoft walks a thin line between Windows 10 telemetry and snooping
Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » Microsoft walks a thin line between Windows 10 telemetry and snooping
- This topic has 16 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by
PKCano.
AuthorTopicViewing 15 reply threadsAuthorReplies-
Jon Macker
Guestwill also work for windows 10
what is important is to turn off targeted
tasks in task scheduler especially
Application Experience and Customer Experience
Improvement Program tasks by deleting them
otherwise they will continue to run even if you have opted out of data collection.
Hope this helps, Jon -
Frank
GuestExcellent and fair article Woody regarding Win 10 data collection. I guess one takeaway would be “when the product is free, you are the product”. I do not want to get into all the back and forth details about what MS is doing or not doing; however, I personally do not view it as being benign as the very design construct of Win 10 is intrusive. I find comparisons to Google snooping of online searches not very compelling as it is more naturally “bounded” by the manner in which I employ their search engine. In the case of Win 10 it is the entire OS and hence covers the user’s entire computing environment. Although I generally approve of regulatory action as an absolute last resort, I do see early parallels to the way we got the Federal Communications and Federal Wire Fraud Acts. In the early days of telephone, eavesdropping on party and private lines was quite common, This occurred for a variety of reasons ranging from personal nosiness to commercial espionage. Once it became apparent that virtually everyone needed a telephone to conduct the requirements of daily living, a new regulatory doctrine was set forth, namely, the telephone company owned the phone and the communication line but they had no legal interest in the communications transmitted. Hence, communications could no longer be eavesdropped without someone obtaining a court order from a judge having jurisdiction. The Federal Wire Fraud Act worked in tandem to prohibit any “artifice or device to deprive a party to the honest use of communication services”. Now we are in the relatively brave new world of the internet where it is increasingly difficult to conduct one’s affairs without a computer with an OS and an ISP. This is rapidly becoming the new telephone and increasingly we are seeing the types of unregulated behaviors by commercial parties that led to a recognized need to legally circumscribe what is kosher and what is not. I fear we are drifting toward some type of regulatory umbrella if this crap continues because after all the internet is at its core just another venue for two way communication and providing an OS should not confer on the provider an unlimited privilege to intercept and store such communication.
-
woody
Manager -
Jess
GuestAll these shenanigans with Win 10, and in particular MS’s various messings with Win 7, have been the last straw, and I am now a happy Linux Mint user. Way to go Microsoft! I stuck with you since Windows 3.0 (yeah, ok, I skipped Vista), but I have a feeling they actually don’t want pesky customers like me who want control over their OS.
-
D.
Guest@Jon Macker,
Earlier tonight I was reading through the helpful information at your Superuser link, double-checking their lists (of windows-update patches not to download and of task-scheduler tasks to disable) against mine. To my knowledge, I have avoided installing all the patches they listed, and I had already disabled most of the tasks they listed.
While I was going through the items on my task scheduler, I came across a task called “Windows Activation Technologies” that has been dormant on my Windows 7 laptop for its entire life (of 2.5 years) until 6 weeks ago, and suddenly the task has started up and has scheduled itself to recur every 90 days.
(This task is not one of those mentioned in the Superuser information gathered at your link, as far as I could see.)I described the task here: https://www.askwoody.com/2010/happening-windows-7s-windows-activation-technologies/comment-page-1/#comment-72390.
I realize that the subject of Woody’s present blog post and of your comment above is Windows 10, but I thought I’d relate my experience of that newly-awoken task here, in case it might be something other folks with Windows 7 who are battling to protect their systems from unwanted changes/breaches would want to keep an eye on.
(If anyone understands why this task has whirred to life and thinks that it would harm my computer if I disabled it, I’d appreciate hearing their thoughts.) -
Eric
GuestWoody,
The InfoWorld article speaks to Win 10.
Above you commented “And the situation’s becoming more dire as MS uses Win10 techniques in Win7 and 8.1.”
This forum has already had plenty of discussion about the back-porting of Win10 data gathering.
How has the situation changed to provoke this warning?
-
woody
ManagerThere have been comments in Win7 KB articles that talk about installing Win10 style monitoring in Win7 and Win 8.1. To date, I haven’t seen any detailed analyses of what’s been injected, but fully expect that some of the Win10 techniques are moving to Win7 and Win 8.1. It’s possible that the “Windows Activation Technologies” task described in comments to this post are part of the, er, infection. I’ll be keeping an eye on it.
-
PKCano
GuestI too am finding this task active on my Win7 machines (but has no record of running on Win8) The last time it was run was in the Nov 2015 time frame and it’s scheduled to run again in Feb and Mar (90 days). There are two parts: a “Validation Task” and a “Validation Task Deadline” set to run 10 days after the first.
-
jah1subs
GuestWoody:
I agree with you. The reason that I trust IBM and Microsoft but do not trust Apple, Google and Facebook is that the first two have been convicted of abusing their monopoly power in the past.
My price for trusting any dominant company in a market in which I participate is that it has been convicted of abuse of monopoly power (or something worse?) and so the government can more easily tear into them and send executives to serve jail time.
I know that some people trust the government less than they trust corporations. I am enough of a Christ follower to know that everyone sins. Therefore, as a practical matter, I trust no one whom I do not very well. And I operate from multiple levels of intermediate trust between none and total as appropriate.
-
RexOfRome
AskWoody Lounger -
D.
GuestOkay, I briefly looked this up on the internet this lunchtime, and I see that it is so powerful that I daren’t disable it.
I have always used genuine copies of everything, so they can probe away at my authenticity (or whatever they are doing) every 90 days.
In the “history” window for this, in the computer management area, it indicates that it has not run on my computer prior to Nov 30, 2015, but I now realize that this cannot be true.
(Silly me, taking that at face value, ha! One must second-guess everything about this sorry business. And yes, it’s a ‘sorry business’ in more ways than one.)I don’t know much about computers, admittedly (because I’m just not interested in the nuts and bolts), and I have grown seriously put out with Microsoft for making it necessary for me to do amateur surgery on the innards of my laptop just to *try to* protect it (and records of my personal behavior and thoughts) from being taken over by them. Sheesh.
Sorry for taking up folks’ time by mentioning something that most here probably already knew (that it’s a necessary service and can rapidly shut the computer down if it’s not allowed to do what it wants).
-
D.
Guest -
oxbridgelee
AskWoody LoungerHi folks
I dealt with kb971033 a while back. If memory serves, it introduces two tasks in the scheduler to check the validity of an installation. The premise being that just because a copy of windows is valid at one point in time, it doesn’t necessarily follow that it will remain so in the future. This is because you may well have bought your copy of windows in good faith that it was ‘genuine’, with a ‘genuine’ certificate of authenticity – you enter the product key and it validates all well and good. Then, six, eight, ten, or however many months later, M$ work out or discover or become aware that your copy is in fact not genuine. So when the validation task is next run, to re check the validity of your installation, the check fails and your ‘genuine’ copy of windows is rumbled. That’s why it may work fine for ages, then suddenly and seemingly for no reason, you hit this problem.
The reason there are two tasks that are set to run with a gap between is – as far as I can tell – to take into account that your pc may be switched off when the task is set to run, or you’re not connected to the internet, or some such similar reason.
Having said that, I have a desktop and laptop, both W7, 64 bit, home premium. Both have kb971033 installed. However, straight after I had validated windows for the 1st time, I deleted the two tasks in scheduler. I’ve had no ill effects as yet and updates still work just fine.
-
Erik
Guest -
woody
Manager -
PKCano
GuestIn Windows 10 there are many privacy settings that supposedly lessen MS’s collection of data. You can choose which apps are allowed to use the hardware, run in the background; you can choose feedback frequency NEVER and diagnostic/usage as BASIC; you can NOT use the store apps or Cortana or Edge or IE. You can use alternate browsers and DuckDuckGo, for example.
But the one thing you can’t curtail is BING, not even a little, because it is the BUILT-IN search engine (much like IE was in earlier Win that caused the European monopoly suit). You have NO CHOICE, no alternative search. When you search your computer for files, it returns not only local results, but results from your network and the Internet.
And, yes, Google and Apple collect search results too. But Google doesn’t have access to personal stuff on the computer, and you don’t have to use it. And you can turn off Spotlight and BING, or limit where they search, on a Mac. But you can’t get away from BING.
MS brags that BING usage has increased. No wonder. And where does the information go. MS, of course! Tell me that’s telemetry!
Viewing 15 reply threads - This topic has 16 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 7 years, 11 months ago by
-

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Debian SparkyLinux 7.2 “Orion Belt”
by
Alex5723
6 hours, 22 minutes ago -
Burt Wolf on Communication
by
Susan Bradley
8 hours, 37 minutes ago -
Converting HHD iMac to SSD
by
pmcjr6142
3 hours, 14 minutes ago -
Bluetooth hack : Hi, My Name Is Keyboard
by
Alex5723
4 hours, 8 minutes ago -
Windows sees RAW, chkdsk sees NTFS
by
Cormy1
6 hours, 43 minutes ago -
Microsoft SMB V1 removal – any updated information
by
Laurie Bronstein
6 hours, 31 minutes ago -
ISO portable PC keyboard that matches standard Dell keyboard
by
glnz
19 hours, 30 minutes ago -
End of support W10
by
barrym
1 day, 1 hour ago -
MS-DEFCON 2: Copilot for Christmas
by
Susan Bradley
2 hours, 24 minutes ago -
Sudden appearance of Edge Search Bar
by
EricB
16 hours, 11 minutes ago -
LogoFAIL firmware exploit bypasses hardware and software security
by
Alex5723
15 hours, 51 minutes ago -
Microsoft outlook ignores the registry keys
by
Heri Harry
2 days, 1 hour ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 22635.2841 released to BETA
by
joep517
1 day, 21 hours ago -
Thunderbird doesn’t open folders at most recent email in Inbox
by
LHiggins
1 day, 1 hour ago -
Three queries about the MS Outlook app on iPadOS
by
TonyC
2 days ago -
Win 10 22H2 November patches: Why do I have these 4 Windows App Runtime apps?
by
WCHS
7 hours, 55 minutes ago -
KB5032278
by
fpefpe
15 hours, 42 minutes ago -
A web browser security testing & privacy testing tool.
by
TechTango
2 days, 11 hours ago -
IOS 17.1.2 looses text alert tone
by
J9438
2 days ago -
What to know about CentOS Linux EOL
by
Alex5723
20 hours, 36 minutes ago -
ESU announcement coming?
by
Susan Bradley
1 hour, 1 minute ago -
December 2023 Office non-Security Updates
by
PKCano
2 days, 12 hours ago -
Widespread Printer Bug caused by Windows Store!
by
Intrepid
22 hours, 41 minutes ago -
Xbox question
by
fernlady
2 days, 19 hours ago -
Unfound Updates
by
rebop2020
2 days, 15 hours ago -
Thieves rob DC Uber Eats driver, reject Android phone for not being iPhone
by
Alex5723
2 days, 17 hours ago -
McAfee popup add (from micro. Store)
by
Robin Heckler
2 days, 18 hours ago -
Random Screen Shut Downs (Windows 11 Pro)
by
OkCarl
1 day, 6 hours ago -
CPU performance degradation after 23H2 update
by
Alex5723
3 days, 7 hours ago -
PDFgear
by
Alex5723
1 day, 15 hours ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2023 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.