I have no idea what changed, but Günter Born reports (and a check of the Update Catalog confirms) that there are new versions of: KB 4088875 – Win7 Ma
[See the full post at: New versions of buggy March Win7 patches are out]
![]() |
There are isolated problems with current patches, but they are well-known and documented on this site. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
New versions of buggy March Win7 patches are out
Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » New versions of buggy March Win7 patches are out
- This topic has 69 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 1 month ago by
anonymous.
AuthorTopicViewing 22 reply threadsAuthorReplies-
gborn
AskWoody_MVPAFAIK the updates itself hasn’t changed. But MS has changed the KB descriptions. Some details here:
https://borncity.com/win/2018/04/05/windows-kb4090450-kb4088875-kb4088878-kb4088881/
Ex Microsoft Windows (Insider) MVP, Microsoft Answers Community Moderator, Blogger, Book author
https://www.borncity.com/win/
-
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVP“I have no idea what changed, but Günter Born reports (and a check of the Update Catalog confirms) that there are new versions of:
KB 4088875 – Win7 March Monthly Rollup (dated, in the Update Catalog, as April 4)
KB 4088878 – Win7 March Security-only patch (also April 4)
KB 4088881 – Preview of the Win7 April Monthly Rollup (also April 4)”
Literally nothing has changed in the Catalog for the x64 versions of these updates (the only ones that I checked). I assume the same is true for the other versions of these three updates. One can see this by downloading the given updates and checking their digital signature dates. The reason that the date changed in the Catalog for these three updates is because their metadata changed.
So what metadata may have changed for these three updates? I already noted that the following text in these three updates changed on April 4 from prior article versions: “This issue is resolved by KB4099950 which will be automatically applied when installing this update.” This suggests that Microsoft is now bundling the download and installation of KB4099950 when one installs any of these three updates in Windows Update. I don’t know if update bundling also happens in WSUS. (I realize that KB4088878 shouldn’t appear in Windows Update, but maybe WSUS has update bundling?) As I noted in the bundling topic, one of the uses of update bundling is to ensure that a given update is installed before another given update is installed. I believe that update bundling does not happen for Catalog downloads, so those of you in Group B will still have to download and install KB4099950 before installing any of these three updates.
-
ch100
AskWoody_MVP -
anonymous
Guest -
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVPThese links seem to suggest that WSUS can do bundled updates:
-
ch100
AskWoody_MVPIt happens all the time, when required.
Few very well known examples:
– Windows 7 / 2008 R2 Service Pack 1 – KB976932 SP1 bundled with SSU KB2533552
Windows 8.1 / 2012 R2 Update 1 – KB2919355 Update 1 bundled with KB2932046, KB2937592, KB2938439, KB2934018, KB2959977
– Windows 8.1 /2012 R2 (unofficially known as Update 3) – KB3000850 Update 3 bundled with KB3003057, KB3016437, KB3014442
– IE11 for Windows 7 / 2008 R2 – KB2841134 IE11 bundled with KB2849696 and KB2849697 Language Packs and KB2533623, KB2639308, KB2670838, KB2729094 v2, KB2731771, KB2786081, KB2834140 v2, KB2882822, KB2888049More recently, most .NET Framework updates are bundles of various individual updates and I think there was at least one Windows 10 recent update which bundled the SSU and the actual update.
Many of those patches come bundled on Windows Update in the same way like they come on WSUS.
For most users and professionals though, there is no reason to look into the details of patching at this level and are better served by following reliable advice and regular patching using one of the proven methods and probably even better following the product manufacturer’s guidelines.1 user thanked author for this post.
-
abbodi86
AskWoody_MVP
-
-
woody
ManagerT
AskWoody PlusI believe that update bundling does not happen for Catalog downloads, so those of you in Group B will still have to download and install KB4099950 before installing any of these three updates.
I’m not disbelieving you and I can well believe this is another example of Microsoft’s gross incompetence but the wording for security-only does state…
This issue is resolved by KB4099950 which will be automatically applied when installing this update
But the package contents have been checked, right? There definitely is no KB4099950 included? Some work experience kid has likely just copied and pasted the monthly roll up text.
Edit to remove HTML: Use the ‘text’ tab in the post entry box when you copy/paste.
1 user thanked author for this post.
ch100
AskWoody_MVPWSUS offers only the 2018-02 Security Monthly and Security Only, also the January equivalent patches on a machine patched until and including December 2017 Security Monthly.
From March 2018, only the CU for IE11 is offered plus few other non-related patches, KB2952664 and the time zone rollup KB4074837.
This may be the case because KB4099950 is not on WSUS and may be a pre-requisite now.
Before the revisions for KB4088875/KB4088878 they were both on offer.Interesting that the internal date of the revisions is the same with the original release date, March 14, 2018.
Which shows that Microsoft does not take guidance from various popular web sites for patch bugs, as some would suggest, but had internal knowledge of the issues early.1 user thanked author for this post.
-
anonymous
Guest
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVPMicrosoft doesn’t appear to be bundling KB4099950 with either KB4088875 or KB4088881, according to data from Windows Update MiniTool. I don’t understand why Microsoft is using language in the KB articles that seems to suggest bundling. Instead, KB4099950 is now a prerequisite for Windows Update to consider KB4088875 or KB4088881 installable.
-
geekdom
AskWoody_MVPWhat are they thinking?
Carpe Diem {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1778 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox114.0b8 MicrosoftDefender
anonymous
GuestI think this is new in 4088875:
With both
“A new Ethernet Network Interface Card (NIC) that has default settings may replace the previously existing NIC, causing network issues after you apply this update. Any custom settings on the previous NIC persist in the registry but are unused”
and
“Static IP address settings are lost after you apply this update.”
it now says:
This issue is resolved by KB4099950 which will be automatically applied when installing this update.
So you no longer have to run a VSB-script yourself or apply the update 4099950 before applying 4088875: it is now rolled into the update.
~ Annemarie
anonymous
GuestIn the description of KB4088875 it contains a new Text about the Network IP issue:
“This issue is resolved by KB4099950 which will be automatically applied when installing this update”Does that mean KB4099950 is now part of the KB4088875 patch?
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVPNo, but it does mean that when one installs KB4088875 in Windows Update, Windows Update now also installs KB4099950 (first, I assume). This is an instance of update bundling. One of the uses of update bundling is to ensure that a given update is installed before another given update. As I mentioned before, I believe that update bundling does not occur for Catalog downloads.
-
anonymous
Guest
-
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVP“Looking at the KBNew page, I also see new versions of:
KB 4099950 – the hotfix patch for bugs in the March Win7 patches (now dated April 4) – I talked about this fix of a fix of a … earlier this week in Computerworld.
KB 4088879 – the Win8.1 Security-only patch (still dated March 10)”
KBNew deals with article versions, not update versions.
The Catalog downloads for KB4099950 are now dated April 4, but a check of the digital signature date of the x64 version of KB4099950 reveals that it hasn’t changed recently. I assume the same is true for the other KB4099950 Catalog downloads.
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVP“KB 4090450 – Spectre V2 patch for Server 2008 (dated April 3)”
From https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4090450/security-update-for-vulnerabilities-in-windows-server-2008: “This security update was rereleased on April 3, 2018.”
1 user thanked author for this post.
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVP“The solution on offer is KB 4099467, which is a single-shot hotfix for Win7 designed specifically to fix this bluescreen.”
abbodi86 analyzed the contents of KB4100480 and KB4099467 at https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/patch-lady-more-updates-released-to-fix-march-patches/#post-179329. I analyzed the contents of KB4100480 at https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/patch-lady-new-update-for-windows-7-kb-4100480/#post-179396.
anonymous
GuestI have downloaded and checked for differences using “fc /b” in a command prompt window (and both DiffMerge and WinMerge as “belt and braces”) both the Windows 7 32 bit and 64 bit versions of the Security Only updates KB4088878 and KB4099950 and the Windows 8.1 versions of the Security Only updates KB4088879 (relevant to my PCs) now in the Catalogue with the versions I downloaded from the Catalogue on 14 March, 1st April and 14 March respectively and (all comparison tools) find the update files identical.
So have only the dates in the Catalogue changed?
-
PKCano
Manager -
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVP -
geekdom
AskWoody_MVP“So have only the dates in the Catalogue changed?” Apparently yes. The date for a given update can change in the Catalog when its metadata that is used by Windows Update changes.
The emperor has new clothes.
Carpe Diem {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1778 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox114.0b8 MicrosoftDefender1 user thanked author for this post.
-
anonymous
Guestpmcjr6142
AskWoody PlusWith these changes, whatever they are, KB408875 Monthly Rollup, previously unchecked, is now gone. It no longer appears as an available update. One less March patch to worry about? I’m left with 4099950 and 4100480. Neither of which I’m in a rush to install. Woody, it’s getting late for a March Defcon change. Do we just wait to see what is offered for April and forget March?
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
PKCano
Manager -
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVP -
ch100
AskWoody_MVPI also noticed that KB4088875 and KB4088881 are currently unavailable in Windows Update. They should be available again sometime very soon.
I think they are already available, but have a dependency on KB4099950.
KB4099950 is not available in WSUS, but it is available as Recommended update in WU.Until KB4099950 is installed, the latest available CU is KB4074598, which is 2018-02 Security Monthly Quality Rollup.
This month’s updating mechanism is messed up and for those who have not installed any of the March updates yet, it is highly recommended to wait for another week until the release of the April CU.
Keep an eye on Patch Lady’s recommendations in this matter.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
woody
ManagerWoody, it’s getting late for a March Defcon change. Do we just wait to see what is offered for April and forget March?
I’ve been wondering that myself.
I think the solution is to have folks avoid the Win7 patches, but to install the others. Unfortunately, that doesn’t take care of “Total Meltdown” on Win7 — and in that case, the cure is probably worse than the disease.
Lemme start gathering together all the bug reports. They are voluminous.
-
anonymous
Guest -
PKCano
Manager -
anonymous
GuestThank you. I was asking because I’m trying to decide whether it’s worth it to ticket to go and help my family and relatives (who are in another city) patch their windows 10 computers this weekend (need to return by Sunday PM), or if I can afford to have them wait another month if it’s still unclear if Match updates for Windows 10 will receive the green light. My apologies if my previous comment came off differently.
-
PKCano
Manager -
PKCano
Manager
-
-
Demeter
AskWoody LoungerAs per the Patch Lady’s recommendation a few days back, I installed KB4100480 since I had the Jan./Feb. Win 7 updates installed. No issues encountered. Didn’t install any March updates and not stepping into the fray until DEFCON changes. Windows Update set to “Never check”, all users in the household warned not to click on “dodgy” links, Norton Safe Search enabled. Good on you Beta testers as the rest of us watch & wait.
anonymous
Guestanonymous
GuestBill C.
AskWoody PlusI believe that update bundling does not happen for Catalog downloads, so those of you in Group B will still have to download and install KB4099950 before installing any of these three updates.
I did notice last night that KB4099950 dated 3/30/2019 was showing when I did a manual check of WU. It is shown in WU as Optional and Unchecked. Still no March Windows OS updates shown, only Feb. I wonder why KB4099950 is not at least recommended, especially since it is now being bundled. It might be that installing KB4099950 alone, via WU would allow the March Rollup to at least show (I wll not install the rollup as I follow Group B). I may see if/when the DefCon changes.
I am still weighing the Rollback of Jan/Feb Group B Windows patches to December or just moving forward. If forward, I will use MrBrian’s ordering mentioned a few days ago after creating a restore point and image first. I would 1. Install KB4099950 via WU, reboot; 2. Install KB4088878 – Security Only via the catalog, reboot; and then, 3. install KB4100480, and reboot.
This patching [problem] is a good illustrator that patience is (hopefully) rewarded and wait for the DefCon change. It is also why the rollback decision is hard, as I suspect MS will not just re-release the updated Jan/Feb catalog SO patches, but instead will issue fixes. That may leave the Group B without some of the Jan/Feb security patches since the SO patches are not rollups.
Also, it is really time again to thank all the MVPs and other contributors, who while not able to devine the unknowable future and intents of MS, have provided valuable insights and advice.
DrBonzo
AskWoody PlusI installed B 4100480 a few days ago (Win 7 Pro x 64 SP1, 5th generation core i3) primarily based on MrBrians analysis here:
https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/patch-lady-new-update-for-windows-7-kb-4100480/#post-179854
In my non-techie opinion it seems that many users would be able to install 4100480 if they DON’T have 32 bit machines and if they already have January and February patches successfully installed.
-
Demeter
AskWoody Lounger
planet
AskWoody Loungerjohn9546
AskWoody Plusrhp52
AskWoody PlusWin7 sp1 x64
I have installed KB4100480
In WU I have one update as important and checked. A .net framework 4.7.1 installer.
In the optional section I’m showing KB4075211- Preview of Monthly Quality Rollup dated 2.22.18, and KB4099950 dated 3.30.18 both unchecked. Not sure what to make of the rollup date? Is this a Feb. Rollup? I’m almost certain that i installed a rollup from February.
Thanks for any help
Win 10 Pro v.20h2
EH
AskWoody LoungerWindows 7 Pro (x64) / Intel Core i7-3820QM / 16GB RAM / NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
I installed the Security Only updates for Jan. 2018 (KB4056897) on 02/14 and Feb. (KB4074587) on 02/22. I then installed KB4099950 on 04/01 in preparation for installing KB4088878, which I held off. While working as a video editor, I have noticed obvious performance issues, specifically video exports from both Premiere Pro and Adobe Media Encoder. Exported videos now exhibit freezes and stutters in random places (only video, not audio), something which has never occurred prior to installing the Jan/Feb updates. I’ve also noticed a slight, overall sluggishness to my system, which was not present prior to Jan/Feb.
Should I simply uninstall the Jan/Feb updates and stay at Dec. 2017? Also, do these revamped March updates address the performance hit caused by the Jan. update?
I have been following the protocol of Group B for quite some time, though this is my first post.
Thank you very much for your time.
-
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVP -
AJNorth
AskWoody PlusMight another (and more convenient) way to disable (and re-enable) the Meltdown/Spectre fixes be to use Steve Gibson’s free utility InSpectre (Gibson Research Corp., Release 7 – https://www.grc.com/inspectre.htm), which includes that ability?
-
laidbacktokyo
AskWoody LoungerFunny.
KB 4099950 – 29kb registry patch-to-patch concerning Meltdown just changed it status from Optional to Recommended, thus it likely seems to be offered to install separately & supposedly prior to any of forthcoming April 10th rollup.
Also both win7 March rollup KB4088875 & preview KB4088881 massive patches vanished from offering list while another March patch-to-patch KB4091290 of 234.9MB remains alive as Recommended.
Rgds,
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
MrBrian
AskWoody_MVPThe metadata for KB 4099950 changed on April 5 according to the date at https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=4099950.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
laidbacktokyo
AskWoody Lounger
-
dgreen
AskWoody Lounger-
PKCano
ManagerI had the same experience (published somewhere in one of the recent topics). What I did was to patch up to the Dec Rollup and any of the patches that showed up with earlier dates (a handful of older patches beginning with “3”) avoiding any of the telemetry patches like KB 2952664 of course. Hid any Rollups after Dec.
-
laidbacktokyo
AskWoody Lounger1. The last 2 of your pics mean that Jan2018 preview KB4057400 is likely installed
2. MSRT is never a problem in my experience. Pls just install it.
3. Pls refer to z attached pic taken just now. This is how list should look today when you wanna temporarily stop this 2018 mess of patching based on Dec2017 rollup installed status, where:
KB2952664 x 2 = win10 upgrade trash, KB3021917 + KB3068708 + KB3080149 = clear & confirmed snooping.
dgreen
AskWoody LoungerI had the same experience (published somewhere in one of the recent topics). What I did was to patch up to the Dec Rollup and any of the patches that showed up with earlier dates (a handful of older patches beginning with “3”) avoiding any of the telemetry patches like KB 2952664 of course. Hid any Rollups after Dec.
PKCano I did exactly what you did (above link) shortly after you did it.
What I posted (#181801) is what I did today.
Correct me if I’m wrong but is the reason that only Feb. rollup shows is because it is after all a rollup, which would include January’s roll up update???
What I did notice is Mar. roll up is missing now. Is that because MS removed it or is that because I haven’t installed Feb.?
and…..
am I not still rolled back to December?
and…..
not install anything until MS fixes this in April (wishful thinking) or May?
and….
if I’m to wait…
although I don’t use IE11 (changed to Chrome) should I maybe consider doing the IE cumulative update for March when the ok is given?and here I thought going to Group A would be easier.
-
PKCano
ManagerHe! People are beginning to realize Group B is getting harder and harder!
You are offered Feb Rollup b/c it is the latest (Mar no longer offered).
You won’t see Jan b/c Feb supersedes it.
Hide the Feb Rollup, search – the Jan Rollup should show up
Hide the Jan Rollup – you may have some old patches show up.Wait for Woody on the IE11 patches. I have been considering that too as an option for those that rolled back.
But we may get out of the woods eventually without joining Group W1 user thanked author for this post.
dgreen
AskWoody Lounger1. The last 2 of your pics mean that Jan2018 preview KB4057400 is likely installed
2. MSRT is never a problem in my experience. Pls just install it.
3. Pls refer to z attached pic taken just now. This is how list should look today when you wanna temporarily stop this 2018 mess of patching based on Dec2017 rollup installed status, where:
KB2952664 x 2 = win10 upgrade trash, KB3021917 + KB3068708 + KB3080149 = clear & confirmed snooping.
laidbacktokyo:
I just checked my installed updates. KB4057400 is not listed as installed. I never install “preview” updates.1 user thanked author for this post.
-
laidbacktokyo
AskWoody Loungerdgreen:
then pls check for KB4091290 as same massive but out-of-line patch.
when you have both rollup & preview of Feb2018 listed as available for install but same time no rollup or preview of Jan2018 and KB4091290, then either Jan2018 Preview KB4057400 or KB4091290 should be installed.
also you can download Dec2017 rollup KB4054518 from catalogue and try to install it as standalone. if win7 response will be ‘not applicable’ then one of 2018 massive patches is surely installed.
next do win7 system disk cleanup including updates and try update search again.
p.s. also you can try the script to list absolutely all updates installed on win7. it’s tested to perform just fine:
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/t/597216/script-to-list-all-installed-updates/
rhp52
AskWoody PlusKB4099950 has now moved from optional to recommended in WU. No other updates, rollups,etc. are present except a .net 4.7.1 installer. Will I need to install this (4099950) or not? I don’t use static IP addresses.
I’m trying to follow this as best I can but this is just getting more challenging everyday. Thanks to all of you who are trying to keep us advised. We appreciate your time and efforts.
Win 10 Pro v.20h2
-
PKCano
Manager
Viewing 22 reply threads - This topic has 69 replies, 20 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 1 month ago by
-

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
numbering in a table (Awaiting moderation)
by
RopyDavits
5 hours, 7 minutes ago -
AMD Software Failed to Launch Because Windows Update Has Replaced the AMD…
by
Alex5723
7 hours, 43 minutes ago -
Microsoft : New macOS vulnerability, Migraine, could bypass System Integrity…
by
Alex5723
9 hours, 45 minutes ago -
Remove One Drive
by
crudolphy
15 hours, 5 minutes ago -
Firefox users on Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 moving to Extended Support Release
by
Alex5723
2 hours, 14 minutes ago -
How to change “User Account Control:Run as administrator”
by
DKThompson
19 hours, 23 minutes ago -
Two monitors, want different “fixed” wallpaper on each one
by
MauryS
1 day, 1 hour ago -
Microsoft forcing move to Microsoft account?
by
Tom
23 hours, 53 minutes ago -
Event 2545 Device Management – Enterprise – Diagnostics – Provider
by
Tex265
1 day, 3 hours ago -
QBot malware exploits Windows WordPad EXE to take over
by
Alex5723
1 day, 22 hours ago -
Laptop powers off during KB5026361 update
by
dhunter
1 day, 22 hours ago -
How to enable Sleep in Shut down menu?
by
Alex5723
2 days ago -
Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs
by
B. Livingston
56 minutes ago -
Longstanding feature requests, and their status
by
Mary Branscombe
2 days, 7 hours ago -
Three typing tutors — no more “hunt and peck”
by
Deanna McElveen
2 days, 7 hours ago -
Is online banking secure?
by
Susan Bradley
43 minutes ago -
Bluetooth audio not working on older Lenovo T420 with Win 10
by
WSmsc0357
1 day, 13 hours ago -
Using wildcards in search and replace
by
Bob Karrow
2 days, 17 hours ago -
How is Windows XP an security risk?
by
Curious
1 day, 3 hours ago -
Is using VPN a good idea?
by
Tex265
2 days, 13 hours ago -
How to prevent/disable Bitlocker Automatic Device Encryption?
by
EricB
3 days ago -
Unexplained aspects of installing the latest update of Office 2021
by
TonyC
3 days ago -
Getting started with macOS Disk Utility: RAID, images, and repairs
by
Alex5723
3 days, 9 hours ago -
Getting started with macOS Disk Utility: Resizing, snapshots, and journaling
by
Alex5723
3 days, 9 hours ago -
Are you ready for AI?
by
Susan Bradley
3 hours, 19 minutes ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 25375 released to Canary
by
joep517
3 days, 12 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 22621.1825 and 22624.1825 released to BETA
by
joep517
3 days, 12 hours ago -
Duplicate image name brings up old images
by
Susan Bradley
4 days, 18 hours ago -
XP offline activation tool, xp_activate32.exe
by
Alex5723
2 days, 7 hours ago -
Huge Tesla leak reveals thousands of safety concerns, privacy problems
by
Alex5723
2 days, 19 hours ago
Recent blog posts
- Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs
- Longstanding feature requests, and their status
- Three typing tutors — no more “hunt and peck”
- Is online banking secure?
- Are you ready for AI?
- MS-DEFCON 4: Skip those Secure Boot scripts
- Getting started with winget
- No NumLock key? Problem solved! Here’s the fix.
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2023 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.