@abbodi86 just noted a change in the list of features deprecated (removed) from Win10 Fall Creators Update, version 1709, expected this October or so.
[See the full post at: Resilient File System (ReFS) “Create” ability being pulled from Win10 Pro]
|
Patch reliability is unclear. Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. |
-
Resilient File System (ReFS) “Create” ability being pulled from Win10 Pro
- This topic has 55 replies, 18 voices, and was last updated 5 years, 6 months ago.
AuthorViewing 8 reply threadsAuthor-
One more thing removed from Pro, making it more like Home edition.
What’s next, ability to join domains in Pro limited to Azure only, not local?
Removing local GPO?
This company, man….SMH.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
Thanks, after all these months of reading, for giving those of us among the unwashed a definition of “deprecated.”
It’s been a long wait.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
Removing System Image Backup? really??
NO! (not yet…)
As the topic said:
System Image Backup [is] being deprecated … not in active development and might be removed in future releases (“Deprecated”)
Referencing: Fall Creators Update will remove some Windows features (from July 24th)
🙂
-
-
-
Maybe Microsoft removed a few assumed to useless previously available settings for Windows 10 Professional customers?
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
A lot of posts here are “fluff” from people ready to socialise but not so interested in technology. Don’t take everything literally, it is a forum after all. Windows 10 Pro is well and alive and can be used in businesses of any size, but mostly intended for those in business who do not qualify for Enterprise licence or for the more technically minded home users. Windows 10 Pro should be the main version in use for most readers here. I will make a big controversial call here, but to me it is clear that Windows 7 and 8.x are dying fast and the only legacy operating system still considered reference is Windows Server 2012 R2 which indirectly provides a lifeline for Windows 8.1.
As far as I know, there are few policies removed from Windows 10 Pro with little impact for those in the know but huge emotional impact for many others.1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
Anyone have any idea what ONE seat of Windows 10 Pro Workstation is going to cost? Another $100 above the Windows 10 Pro Amateur Edition perhaps?
I always bought Ultimate in the past. I’d be willing to pay for a supported, serious system.
Microsoft, in case you’re reading here looking for ideas to further differentiate Windows 10 Workstation from Windows 10 Amateur, some suggestions:
- The ability to run as a pure desktop system – no Cortana, no Apps.
- If not “no Apps”, then a way to make them stay out of the way. It’s about work.
- Full privacy; “off” as the default configuration for telemetry.
- Provide configuration options to MINIMIZE your junkware and thus maximize the system for our work. That’s right, not everyone wants your application software.
- Bring back control, such as control of desktop theming; some of us LIKE rounded corners, buttons with style, Aero Glass, sounds for important events.
- Programmable DNS site and URL blacklisting with wildcard capability.
- Visual Studio bundled in.
- Continue to support IE, with full security configurability as a business browser.
- A tool for vocalizing arbitrary things, e.g., for helping with proofreading.
- Optimizations for deep multitasking – for example having 30 or 40 applications running at once, and integrating them together smoothly.
In other words, the best of what Windows desktop systems WERE, and what I’ve tried to tweak Win 10 “Creator’s Update” into BEING in pursuit of a nice desktop system – and all well-supported by Microsoft!
If you want to SELL Windows 10 Workstation, you will need to make the professional features REAL again, not just pay them lip service.
Windows 10 for real WORK has been neglected for too long.
-Noel
14 users thanked author for this post.
-
The most important item on the list:
It must be an LTS version. That is what would make me buy it. If not, we are just talking about the same Windows amateur version that has been going on.
I bought Vista Ultimate and never used any of what it offered. Apart from bitlocker and MUI language packs which I thought I would use but I didn’t, it only offered some games and decoration like wallpapers. Not such a great value proposition.
I am very disappointed about the move of ReFS to W version. Now we keep toys for Pro version and move basic OS features like modern filesystems to special versions? Reliability is not important for home users and small businesses that don’t use their PC as a graphics/CAD workstation?
7 users thanked author for this post.
-
I am not so sure that ReFS is such a core feature. It is certainly a “nice to have” feature, but core feature? I would dare to ask regular registered users here to post how many of them have ever used ReFS and how many actually know what ReFS is or heard about ReFS.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
There’s a developer out there who’s resurrected Aero Glass, and as part of his package he patches the system at run time to re-allow the loading of 3rd party themes. He’s not the only one who’s accomplished that latter… There are a surprising number of alternate Windows 10 themes, e.g., on DeviantArt.
See also:
http://www.glass8.eu/
http://www.msfn.org/board/forum/180-aero-glass-for-windows-8/-Noel
1 user thanked author for this post.
You saved me quite a bit of typing there! 😀 but you forgot two things…
No ads!
No updates released until found bug-free!
Forget all about the stupid idea of releasing after a date schedule a’la “Patch Tuesday”!
If you find an error, work on the fix and release the thing once properly tested.
You may send me an email, if you’ve developed a fantastic new feature and offer me it via a link to your fantastic webshop. Don’t force-feed me anything…
…
Price is really secondary and I’m prepared to pay whatever, but if they don’t deliver as requested above, I’m finally out. Let’s see in a year or so…
7 users thanked author for this post.
-
…once properly tested…
Nice idea, but probably impossible to hope for. Microsoft dissolved its testing organization. That’s not coming back soon.
The engineers are expected to test their own software now, and while that’s certainly a wonderful idea, it doesn’t – CAN’T – substitute completely for a professional test organization designed from the ground up to think of ways to break the system, not want to see it work.
Microsoft is running on inertia presently, building on the good and tested works of the past. But I predict that’s not going to keep; as they change out more and more of the infrastructure of Windows, they’re going to find they can no longer build on things that aren’t rock solid, and the software engineering industry has proven time and again that they CAN’T be rock solid without internal competition to make them so.
Even millions of users can’t possibly test things as thoroughly as an organization with a plan.
Dissolving their internal testing is one of those things that, as they say, “isn’t going to end well”. That’s my professional opinion.
-Noel
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
Even millions of users can’t possibly test things as thoroughly as an organization with a plan.
Honestly? Looking at various forums what is “tested” by Insiders is real basics – like “Live tiles not working”, “Start Menu stuck”, “game crashing” etc. – so while you have a possibility to check if the system works AT ALL at basically unlimited number of configurations, more sophisticated functionalities won’t be tested – since “professionals” mostly don’t bother with installing Insider builds, and “enthusiats” will give you feedback like “give us dark theme”, “new emojis” and “change status bar colour”.
ASUS PRIME Z270-K * Intel Core i7-6700 * 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 MHz * Aorus Radeon RX 570 4GB * Samsung 840 EVO 250GB SSD * SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB SSD * DVD RW Lite-ON iHAS 124 * Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer PCI * Windows 10 Pro 21H2 64-bit1 user thanked author for this post.
-
Well, if they can’t properly test updates before release, then I wonder, what way they understand the meaning of “pro” and “work”…
I did read the wonderful 56-page article by the Microsoft engineer, and frankly… it’s impossible to base a working company with critical software on that solution.
“In WaaS you do “Proactive Testing” and you configure everything without making any mistakes and running through quality gates. (sure you do)
But – due to the fact of not having unlimited time like in Windows 7 – there will come a point in time, where you just suggest that everything will work.
What is the impact for the chosen users who will run into problems?
They will call either Support desk or their Application Holder and then roll back –> 30 minutes to 60 minutes”Unless your company makes a living of installing/testing Windows, then that try’n’error attitude will cost you time = money and in worst case scenario customers/clients…
It may work in large companies with 1000s of users, but for us small ones with one to 20-30 (?) users, that is simply not a safe and stable foundation to build on.
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
The other problem is although I found some bugs and reported them initially as an insider, probably the very low volume of those bugs found when looking a bit deeper than on the surface gets drowned by requests for flashy new things by enthusiastic users, so I don’t have much hope they will be fixed.
If you have a million voices, only the most popular topics will get addressed? If people don’t notice some significant failures of the underlying OS, it won’t be seen easily. You could argue they might not be that significant anyway if nobody notices, but as an example, if the OS leaked your wifi passwords to people who connect on the same network and you didn’t notice it, would you still find that minor? What if there was corruption in the not tested that much ReFS so that occasionnaly, a bit gets flipped on random files?
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
Thanks, I wondered for too long about origin of the (to be nice) odd “Quality update” phrase. Maybe Microsoft itself must be the primary user of Bing to help account for the two point something percent share of users.
The dedicated testers which were fired were not a negative profit draining asset they were creators of bug reports, other insightful data and could examine the source code. The reply left by Mr. Kesler matches the description of how Microsoft used to do testing, which can be corroborated (and/or inferred) in the excellent book Showstopper by G. Pascal Zachary.
Developers doing both jobs could lead to increased employee burn-out at such high release rates; I wonder what the burn-out rate is for the folks that are members Arch Linux distribution project and other similar projects.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
From the Business Insider article:
Testing will no longer be done by a totally dedicated team, but will be rolled into the developer team. Nadella believes this will reduce bureaucracy and let Microsoft deliver products faster.
Nadella has no clue about the necessity of rigorous and thorough testing. I guess he figures that the users will do the testing for him. In the short term, his bottom line will improve. But at some point, the users will get fed up with being treated like guinea pigs and will abandon Microsoft in large numbers.
If you don’t test your products thoroughly, of course you can get them to market faster. But at what cost? The public will quickly learn that Microsoft sells junk, and they will look elsewhere for the products that they need.
Hey WordPerfect, this may be your chance to regain the market dominance you lost to Microsoft! Are you listening?
Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 8.1 running in a VM3 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
I thought the original idea was there would be 1 version of W10 but it seems the marketing failures have struck again. It’s getting to the point of being very difficult to keep the versions straight as well as which hardware MS will deprecate on you.
2 users thanked author for this post.
I have customers + myself that want this version. It appears (crossing fingers) that it returns most of the high end management features we expected, but are losing, in Pro . . . without the stupid monthly/annual recurring subscription costs for ENT.
Just hoping that they don’t change their mind and make this the SMB Office 365 edition of the E OS plans instead – half expecting that though, which would ruin the idea.
~ Group "Weekend" ~
2 users thanked author for this post.
-
I’ve been expecting something like this for while. We thought MS would run this past CCB last year. There are ‘whispers’ that despite the purge of the last 6 months there is a fierce inside struggle that has surprised both Microsoft’s board and it’s CEO. At this moment win 10 pro w may have more meanings than we understand.
-
There are ‘whispers’ that despite the purge of the last 6 months there is a fierce inside struggle that has surprised both Microsoft’s board and it’s CEO. At this moment win 10 pro w may have more meanings than we understand.
My personal opinion only:
I’ve been hearing about that struggle too. Nothing I can source, quote or substantiate . . . but stating this in a very oversimplified matter — the battle appears to be happening between a small MSFT veteran group that may want to continue to provide long term permanent seats for premium products, and the newer crowd (and upper leadership) that may be pushing Nadella’s vision of recurring revenue and deep integration with cloud services. My personal opinion/guess is that the newer method might win.
If we hear about some sudden retirements or major product group re-orgs from the Windows team by EOY that will be pretty much a sign of the end of that battle.
~ Group "Weekend" ~
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
… long term permanent seats for premium products…
This was perhaps the key foundation of why so many people chose Microsoft over other companies. It provided stability.
The new model undercuts that stability. In other words, Microsoft is eliminating the key reason why everyone was loyal to them, in hopes of getting success elsewhere. When you are king of the hill, it is foolish to abandon what got you into that position in the first place, and what has kept you there for so long.
In the past, Microsoft was able to throw their competitors off of their game, and thereby topple these companies. It appears that Microsoft has gotten off of its game. And if they don’t get back on message soon, they will find that they are no longer king of the hill, and that the market has changed. In other words, they will reach a point where it will be too late for them to right the ship and continue to dominate. They may have already passed the point of no return.
Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 8.1 running in a VM3 users thanked author for this post.
-
I’ve been hearing much of the same. Some of this I’m sure is just the usual griping one hears, when a new team is installed. BUT, there is something going on. Microsoft’s second wave of lay offs took out some long time heavy hitters, men and women with deep ties to Gates and his long time board members. And the failure of win 10/cloud computing is a massive black mark for the current CEO, and the board members that back him. Yes, the current CEO should win, the majority of the board has backed him so far. And yet, we have win 10 pro workstation and now the backtracking in Germany. Something is going on, I’m sure of it. I don’t know what it means.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
Well, we will agree to disagree. The tell is when MS did their first round of lay-offs. Wiping out their Q and A and Hardware support teams destroyed their back end protection. They renamed the current update system ‘cloud’ while firing the very people who were overseeing it. A ‘cloud system’ by its very nature is a secure system. The backend, is overstaffed to handle the mass demands of it client and customer base. Hey, this is basic command and control in communications 101. MS bootstrapped their ‘new cloud’ on their current update system and blew it apart. If the current CEO had an once of integrity, he would have announce a massive hiring campaign to build a separate and secure system for his ‘new cloud’. Yes, Apple does it right. Because Jobs accepted the increase hardware and personal costs for closed systems right of the bat. I run secure systems and it’s not cheap. The extra personal and hardware is needed just to handle unexpected problems that come from your client and customer base every day. Every. Single. Day. This is Billion Dollar Corporation we are posting about. So why is the CEO acting like he is the boss of a cheap web startup and short changing his customer base.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
-
There is no doubt that the cloud group will win. It is just common sense and anything else is only wishful thinking from people who cannot keep up with change and keep dreaming to past (possible better) times.
2 users thanked author for this post.
All of this makes me think of Thomas Kuhn’s The Structure of Scientific Revolution. He’s the philosopher guy who coined the “paradigm change” idea in science. Very interesting read.
For him, paradigm shifts occurs when old people die. People don’t change their mind easily, even in science, even with facts discounting the old paradigm. If you believed in alchemy, there’s a very good chance that however smart you are, you won’t change your mind when modern chemistry will arrive.
So, maybe lots of us are just crazy old smart folks who don’t get the new world.
I spoke to a relative this weekend and I asked him a question already knowing the answer. He’s a young, smart, programmer. I asked what he thought of Win 10. He doesn’t care. I said you don’t find it disturbing to see the ads, the useless toys apps everywhere, not really understanding what is constantly changing? He said no, I don’t see it, I just do what I have to do on the computer and ignore the rest. He has grown in this new culture, used to ignoring ads all over the place and not having control on many things. He doesn’t care about his privacy, he thinks his data is already collected everywhere and doesn’t seem to care much because he doesn’t see the impacts or he don’t care being served targeted ads.
To me, that is awful, but to him, it’s no big deal. Paradigm shift?
I’m afraid the future don’t belong to the old school computer users as our voice will be smaller and smaller as time goes by. I don’t think it is the right way to go, but I’m not sure it can be stopped, unless lots of big businesses voices gets too loud for Microsoft to ignore, if they struggle too much with the new way of doing things. Unfortunately, probably the big businesses with dedicated resources will be less affected than smaller ones because the latter can’t afford a full-time employee to test constant changes in Windows.
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
Oh, but I forgot a comment the young programmer made in my story and I remembered it after seeing the recent post from Noel about Visual Studio.
After my relative said he doesn’t care about Windows 10, he said that however, he was sick of the latest Visual Studio being so bad and broken. I didn’t even bother telling him that maybe fast release cycles and different testing methodologies might have played a role in his experience. That wasn’t a what you don’t see don’t bother you thing, this time, unlike his Windows 10 experience.
This whole thing just gives me more evidence about the idea that the OS is for many just a gateway to apps and it almost can be reduced to the list of compatible apps for most people, or a recognizable brand name to others, a default option for lack of interest for the common mortal or lack of benefits perceived for efforts required. However, when your apps start to misbehave, it can be more annoying to even the least interested individuals. If not, what are you doing on a computer if you don’t care at all what it does?
It is already hard to do rapid releases properly. Windows hasn’t been built for that and I don’t believe that MS can turn it that way fast enough. They are not even to not deprecate a system image backup tool they built. We still experience feature upgrades in a similar way to old upgrades that broke systems. It is simply unacceptable.
Even Apple often breaks things when doing their big upgrades with their built for that IOS. Of all the phones I manage, it happens sometimes that one will not survive the IOS update. But as annoying as it is when it breaks, it often remains a mild annoyance, as Apple built a whole way of working to make sure it is easy to “repair” the device: they almost force the user to do a local or cloud backup automatically before (you don’t have to understand how or what it does, skipping common code easily downloadable and system files) and if something break, you can reset your system from the backup without loosing data they backed up for you, except for a few things like if you do weird things like manually managing your music but then you already know better. So, you call Apple for free, they tell you how to fix it, and then you get on with your life for another year without a big OS upgrade. Microsoft is so far from this and let’s not talk about their tech support for home users here.
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
This is the one issue that we all are dealing with. OEMs are livid with Microsoft for badly botching this. Software developers are screaming about lack of documentation and standards. But this is a serious problem across the software side of the industry. Software Devs are not the problem, it’s the corporate culture we are seeing from these companies that is so disturbing. It is just not Microsoft alone that my IT teams have to clean up behind, this seems to be wide spread. In extreme cases, we bypass the company and deal straight with creator of the software we use. (Our in house law team hates me.) I think we are beginning to see the second and third order effects of hiring policy’s of the past decade, combined with the attitude of profit over growth. What really bother’s me is the lack of institutional memory many of these software companies have. Microsoft’s failure to successfully transfer to cloud computing simply should have not happened. There is way too much institutional knowledge there. We may have a far bigger problem than we understand.
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
What really bother’s me is the lack of institutional memory many of these software companies have.
There ya go . . .
There are other sides to the argument on not retaining older – long term serving – talent at these companies. Some argue that newer faces bring more agility to the team. Fresh energy. Less likely to want a work/life balance. Lower pay expectations with their reduced years of experience.
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
– George SantayanaBut without certain industry veterans helping to guide the vision, it’s becoming clear that the vision can become very muddy.
~ Group "Weekend" ~
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
-
@alexeiffel
You know very well that we don’t always agree, but from my perspective, your posts are always challenging and have substance. Seriously, you and @NetDef should be MVPs on this forum 🙂
In relation to your post, iOS actually has a major difference when compared to Windows. The end user is “never” (at least in the supported configuration, non-jailbroken) the System Administrator of the iOS, but the system is rather managed by Apple, in the good Cloud fashion.
On a different, but related subject, you may find this post interesting, although it is not for the regular, non-power users.
Throwback Thursday: To CBB or to LTSB?
https://www.ivanti.com/blog/throwback-thursday-to-cbb-or-to-ltsb/
and a variation of it from the same expert (by all commonly accepted standards)
Windows 10 servicing branches – CBB or LTSB? A discussion
http://www.htguk.com/windows-10-servicing-branches-cbb-ltsb/2 users thanked author for this post.
-
-
I find the LTSB avoidance recommendation for general-purpose computers from MS more a wishful thinking about where they want us to go than a real necessity.
I found interesting that in recent versions of Citrix XenDesktop, LTSB is supported by Citrix as VDI.
Previously the support option was vague, in the sense of only Enterprise being mentioned, which leaves room for interpretation as LTSB about which we keep discussing is one of the Enterprise versions. I think there is an IoT LTSB as well, which is like an LTSB core version, intended for embedded devices or thin clients.
http://docs.citrix.com/en-us/xenapp-and-xendesktop/7-15-ltsr/system-requirements.html#introFor XenApp and XenDesktop components and features that can be installed on Windows Servers, Server Core and Nano Server installations are not supported, unless specifically noted.
For components and features that can be used on Windows 10 machines, the following Windows 10 servicing options and editions are supported:
Current Branch for Business (CBB): Pro, Enterprise, Education, Mobile Enterprise (the IoT Core Pro Edition is supported only for Citrix Receiver)
Long Term Service Branch (LTSB): LTSB
Current Branch (CB): Not supportedCitrix have their equivalent of CBB, released about every three months and once every year or so, some of the versions are also declared LTSR (LTSB/LTSC equivalent) with special (more expensive) support plans and updating. Unlike Microsoft, Citrix supports fully LTSR for larger implementations with complex Change Management processes.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
This makes it even more interesting because Citrix is not any third-party, but a very close partner and in some ways even acts like a highly specialised Microsoft subsidiary.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
Thing is, some of we “old guys” who have embraced technology our whole lives and who are now being marginalized as “resistant to change” are no strangers to change. Many/most of us here vocalizing criticism for “the new Microsoft” are actually those who embrace change. We know that with change comes opportunity. We also know the smell of BS all too well. 🙂
Heck, I’ve personally set up one of the more productive Win 10 systems right here in a virtual machine in front of me, having done with it what few others have just by applying knowledge and a sense of joy in discovery of new things.
And oh and by the way on the subject of this thread, I actually use ReFS every day. I know from experience what it means to make creating volumes with it unavailable to most users.
Just keep in mind the possibility that some of us might just be wise enough to see what’s going to be able to work – and what is not. Hard to believe but we have already lived through paradigm shifts before. Many of us trying to influence the direction of computing have made a life out of making the best of them.
But hey, go figure it all out for yourselves. The journey is the fun part! You feel like you see things in a new way. Just try not to become bitter when the next generation comes along all too soon and tells you how things REALLY need to be done, because THEY of course know better. 🙂
-Noel “makin’ the best of Windows one day at a time…” 🙂
3 users thanked author for this post.
Viewing 8 reply threads
Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Recent Topics
-
KB 5022836 will not install
by 1 hour, 14 minutes ago
-
Windows 11 desktop for Windows 10 user
by 3 hours, 20 minutes ago
-
GNOME 44 ‘Kuala Lumpur’ released
by 6 hours ago
-
Emotet adopts Microsoft OneNote attachments
by 6 hours, 8 minutes ago
-
US : The Spy Law That Big Tech Wants to Limit
by 6 hours, 30 minutes ago
-
Ferrari confirms customer data breached following ransomware attack
by 6 hours, 56 minutes ago
-
Outlook bookmarks redirects to a different location, Help!
by 8 hours, 32 minutes ago
-
Should I go to win11?
by 7 hours, 15 minutes ago
-
The Framework Laptop – Fully Modular
by 14 hours, 14 minutes ago
-
Windows Snipping Tool is vulnerable to Acropalypse too.
by 8 hours, 7 minutes ago
-
Pale Moon updates
by 17 hours, 16 minutes ago
-
“Local Security Authority protection is off.” with persistent restart
by 6 hours, 38 minutes ago
-
Self-encrypting drive setup on Linux
by 18 hours, 46 minutes ago
-
Windows 11 Moments and local account setup
by 11 hours, 57 minutes ago
-
Older versions of Roboform
by 1 day, 1 hour ago
-
Long string filenames
by 23 hours, 33 minutes ago
-
Windows 11 Build 22621.1483 released to Release Preview
by 1 day, 2 hours ago
-
Will adding RAM to re-purposed PCs trigger activation again?
by 5 hours, 12 minutes ago
-
Digital Photography Review to close
by 14 hours, 15 minutes ago
-
Dish Network Hacked
by 6 hours, 3 minutes ago
-
NewQ 16-in-1 USB C/TB4 Docking Station
by 1 day, 7 hours ago
-
Is Office 2007 compromised by Windows 10?
by 15 hours, 5 minutes ago
-
ZippyShare to shut down at end of month
by 1 day, 11 hours ago
-
Odd monitor issue since last update…
by 2 days, 2 hours ago
-
Powershell
by 1 day, 2 hours ago
-
M1 Pro MacBook Pro running Parallels and Windows 11 on ARM
by 1 day, 13 hours ago
-
Make Google Maps Android full screen (without overlays)
by 11 hours, 31 minutes ago
-
How do I most easily see replies made to posts rather than to the topic?
by 4 hours, 15 minutes ago
-
Searching for documents on an additional drive
by 2 days, 3 hours ago
-
Two ADMX templates for MS Edge
by 2 days, 9 hours ago
