I was afraid this would happen. When Microsoft releases two security patches back-to-back, it’s rare that the second patch goes in without problems. I
[See the full post at: Widespread reports of problems with the second March Win10 cumulative update, KB 4551762, the SMBv3 patch]
![]() |
There are isolated problems with current patches, but they are well-known and documented on this site. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
Widespread reports of problems with the second March Win10 cumulative update, KB 4551762, the SMBv3 patch
Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » Widespread reports of problems with the second March Win10 cumulative update, KB 4551762, the SMBv3 patch
- This topic has 37 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 6 months ago.
AuthorTopicwoody
ManagerViewing 16 reply threadsAuthorReplies-
anonymous
Guest -
PKCano
ManagerYes, you are OK with v1809 as long as you take precautions to prevent MS from forcing V1909 on your computer.
V1809 is EOL on May 12, 2020 – so don’t wait too long.You should download the Media Creation Tool and Make an ISO of v1909 now, though. Put it in a safe place so you can upgrade when you are ready. In the event that v2004 is released, v1909 will no longer be easily available.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
bbearren
AskWoody MVPSo far this year I have everything Microsoft has had to offer when I Check for updates:
KB4551762 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 3/12/2020
KB4540673 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 3/10/2020
KB4535996 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 3/10/2020
KB4052623 Update for Windows Defender Antivirus antimalware platform – (Version 4.18.2001.10)
Successfully installed on 2/27/2020
KB4537572 Cumulative Update for .NET Framework 3.5 and 4.8 for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 2/27/2020
KB4524244 Security Update for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 2/11/2020
KB4537759 Security Update for Adobe Flash Player for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 2/11/2020
KB4532695 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 1/28/2020
KB4534132 Cumulative Update for .NET Framework 3.5 and 4.8 for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 1/28/2020
KB4532938 Cumulative Update for .NET Framework 3.5 and 4.8 for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 1/14/2020
KB4528760 Cumulative Update for Windows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems
Successfully installed on 1/14/2020I have no glitches, no issues, no performance drop-offs, no right-click context menu hesitations, no black screens, no BSOD’s, no slow boots (I can restart from the A side and boot to the B side of my dual boot in less than one minute, either way), no system hangs.
In other words, nothing at all unusual to report. Both sides of my dual boot are normal, and the B side is definitely not an installation supported by Microsoft.
Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!We were all once "Average Users". We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems, we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.4 users thanked author for this post.
-
WSaltamirano
AskWoody Lounger -
EP
AskWoody_MVP
-
Susan Bradley
ManagerI don’t honestly see masses of reports. I see some, but not widespread. On the machines I have patched, not seeing issues. I’d be asking what a/v? Are you up to date on video and bios? Any other unusual programs or apps that you use?
Susan Bradley Patch Lady/Prudent patcher
geekdom
AskWoody_MVPMicrosoft forum information clearing house is reporting problems:
On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefenderanonymous
GuestAnother Issue that I faced on my device was, post the patch install and reboot, the trackpad became non-responsive. Had to remove the patch, hit the reset button, followed by another reboot to get it working again. I am running Win10 1909 build 18363.719 with synaptics pointing device.
anonymous
GuestPossible related issue: Installed the update yesterday, turned on PC this morning, Windows Update did its usual automatic check for updates, and for the past hour, it is still checking for updates. Wonder if it is related to the patch or is another issue? Anyone experiencing anything similar?
WSaltamirano
AskWoody Lounger-
PKCano
Manager
abbodi86
AskWoody_MVP-
geekdom
AskWoody_MVPHave you generated anything that is reproducible?
On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender -
abbodi86
AskWoody_MVP -
geekdom
AskWoody_MVPShort form: Microsoft updates run forward and backward flagging changes only. I found this explanation based on your reply:
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/deployment/update/psfxwhitepaperSource and further information:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-ama-archive/windows-10-version-1809-cumulative-updates/m-p/301562On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender-
This reply was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by
geekdom.
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by
geekdom.
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by
geekdom.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
This reply was modified 3 years, 6 months ago by
-
abbodi86
AskWoody_MVP
-
-
-
anonymous
GuestSMB Compression is not yet used by Windows or Windows Server, and disabling SMB Compression has no negative performance impact.
This is quite an imprecise and confusing claim. SMB Compression is certainly not yet used in Windows Server 2019 and previous versions, but not used in Windows at all? If that was true then how could Windows possibly be vulnerable?
Maybe they mean “SMB Compression is not yet used by Windows or Windows Server, so disabling SMB Compression has no negative performance impact.”
This could make sense if both the server and client in 1903/1909 support compression, but only if the other side tries to negotiate it, and neither actually try to negotiate it. This would mean that current clients and servers would only start speaking compression with a new windows version (or an exploit program). But if this were the case, it seems strange that the vulnerability would affect both the server and client.
-
Susan Bradley
Manager -
anonymous
GuestI understand that; but the sentence is still confusing. If I had two Windows 10 1909 boxes and one of them hosted an SMB share, surely they would use SMB compression if it was not disabled via the registry on the server?
Yet the new sentence in the knowledge base article implies that is not the case.
SMB Compression is not yet used by Windows or Windows Server, and disabling SMB Compression has no negative performance impact.
It’s very hard to google now that the search results are filled with articles about the CVE, but I’ve seen benchmarks comparing SMB3 compression on and off, so surely people can already use SMB3 compression without doing anything special; considering it takes a registry setting to turn it off, it must be on by default.
-
r1ma
AskWoody Lounger-
woody
Manager
anonymous
Guesthave updated 5 systems without any problems and not heard of any problems for anyone i know either. so so far so good, does not feel like the problem seen are “widespread” more like the normal spread, problems are always more visibly reported then smooth rides
1 user thanked author for this post.
mledman
AskWoody Plusreztiwss
AskWoody Lounger-
anonymous
Guest
anonymous
GuestWindows 10 Pro 64-bit. MS apparently has now begun to modify the 1803 cumulative updates beginning in March to block these from being installed on Pro edition. We are checking for upgrade to the 1909 release. Used a DVD to do an offline installation of 1909 build 18363,592, standalone applied the SSU update KB4541338, and then standalone applied the March 1909 KB4540673 update for build 18363.719. Machine stable for 3 days, except that the wanted view/sorting of folders does not persist.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
abbodi86
AskWoody_MVP -
anonymous
GuestIn previous months since EOL the monthly 1803 updates would install on Home successfully and without any messages. Now with the March 2020 update, the standalone installer immediately gives a “not applicable” error before doing any installation of the package. So MS has changed the code in the MSU to check for Pro (and certainly also Home) edition and stop the installation.
-
EP
AskWoody_MVP-
anonymous
GuestAgreed — the KB4540673 appears to be generally stable (so we picked that one to get as currently updated as we could while remaining stable), the newer KB4551762 seems to be unstable and causing grief for a number of users. Happily the earlier March 2020 KB4540673 can still be obtained by manual download from MS Update Catalog as of several days ago.
-
EP
AskWoody_MVP
-
anonymous
GuestEP
AskWoody_MVPthis came out on Bleepingcomputer’s web site, woody
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/windows-10-kb4551762-security-update-fails-to-install-causes-issues/one potential solution there is to do an “in-place” upgrade
also check on this new “print” issue with KB4551762:
https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/win10-1909-kb4551762/Tex265
AskWoody PlusViewing 16 reply threads -

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 23555 released to DEV
by
joep517
1 hour ago -
Something didn’t go as planned KB5030310, KB 5030219
by
Donald Wyllie
21 minutes ago -
“Enhanced” search box
by
WSraysig
2 hours, 12 minutes ago -
Windows Ends Installation Path for Free Windows 7/8 Upgrade
by
Alex5723
2 hours, 57 minutes ago -
Icon text drop shadows latest Win 11 update
by
kenlcarter50
2 hours, 40 minutes ago -
Group Policy to change context menu to Win10 version?
by
HATech19
4 hours, 33 minutes ago -
You can no longer activate newer Windows 11 builds with Windows 7/8/8.1 keys
by
joep517
5 hours, 22 minutes ago -
Reddit is removing the option to prevent Reddit from tracking ..
by
Alex5723
12 hours, 24 minutes ago -
Vivaldi for iOS and iPadOS released
by
Alex5723
12 hours, 28 minutes ago -
Windows 11 attempted update to 22H2 results in Error Code 0x8024001e
by
Tiernan
1 hour, 37 minutes ago -
lock screen goes black after ~ 25-30 secs.
by
krism
5 hours, 11 minutes ago -
Need File Location Which Lists Default Apps Used
by
HARLEYMAN124
5 hours, 17 minutes ago -
Canadian’s identify alternative tape that prolongs life of laptop batteries
by
Kathy Stevens
22 hours, 36 minutes ago -
Browswers and Windows 11
by
WSG
23 hours ago -
Advice on whether to upgrade to Windows 11
by
millerah
23 hours, 33 minutes ago -
Linuxmint LMDE 6 Officially Released
by
Microfix
2 hours, 25 minutes ago -
Edge browser – ad quality concern
by
doriel
1 day, 2 hours ago -
Strange problem after upgrade from Win10Pro 22H2 to Win11Pro 22H2
by
JohnH
13 hours, 39 minutes ago -
Return Full Context Menus to File Explorer
by
RetiredGeek
4 hours, 34 minutes ago -
Unusual Activity on Startup
by
Kenneth Stephens
21 hours, 41 minutes ago -
Windows Backup – incremental possible?
by
colin_thames
1 day, 22 hours ago -
New HD addition??
by
weendoggy
1 day, 13 hours ago -
Defcon 4 and Windows 11
by
cmar6
2 days, 5 hours ago -
Add-ins keep disappearing
by
hession
2 days, 3 hours ago -
MS-DEFCON 4: Is Windows 11 really a disaster?
by
Susan Bradley
4 hours, 4 minutes ago -
The Takahē is not extinct afterall
by
lylejk
2 days, 14 hours ago -
How to unbloc W10pro from moving to W11
by
hession
3 days, 4 hours ago -
Windows 11, Surface, and Windows Copilot
by
Will Fastie
35 minutes ago -
Why File Explorer keeps me on Windows
by
Josh Hendrickson
15 hours, 2 minutes ago -
Uninstalr — “World’s best cup of coffee”
by
Deanna McElveen
3 hours, 33 minutes ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2023 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.