-
alejr
AskWoody MVPUsing Tilde (~) is a “softfail” and is used for debugging / initial testing. It should be replaced by a minus (-) when you have finished testing – all other sources should fail.
While that’s “suppose” to be how it’s used, in reality using the – fail option “can” cause legitimate e-mails to be rejected, especially if the receiving MTA doesn’t support DMARC verification, so it’s recommended to use ~ softfail instead to avoid that possibly.
Regardless, her tworg.com SPF shouldn’t be using the ? neutral option; which basically returns “unknown” to validation requests.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPCloudflare email record is attached for tworg.com. mygoforthegreen.com’s is the same except DMARC is marked “None” and SPF is “Soft Fail”.
Ran a SPF record check on your mygoforthegreen.com domain and its SPF record isn’t close to being the same as tworg.com:
v=spf1 +mx +a +ip4:198.46.81.47 +include:smtp.servconfig.com ~all
Note how, in addition to mx, a and ip4, it includes the outgoing mail server domain where the tworg.com SPF record doesn’t include any of those.
FYI, I ran a MX record check on tworg.com and it’s mail server is mail.tworg.com
I also ran a DKIM record check for tworg.com and, despite what your attachment shows, the results were No DKIM Record found!
Finally, as pointed out by Paul T, the IP addresses in the SPF record for tworg.com do not match what a DNS record check shows:
104.21.60.216 and 172.67.201.204.
So it’s pretty clear the problem is the SPF record for tworg.org isn’t setup correctly which is what’s causing your problem.
BTW, I ran into the same issue where Gmail wouldn’t accept e-mail from my Uncle’s web site and the fix was to add a SPF record that included our mail server domain name.
That link you keep trying to use at Google is for domains “hosted” by Google which is why it’s not working (BTDT!)
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPNot true.
Take a look at this Krebs on Security article.
It was published 9 months ago in Sep 2022 which means hackers have probably created even more ways of adding readers to those “flat screen” type ATM slots.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPGo back and read the article.
This wasn’t “surreptitiously” installed in their BIOS, it’s a “feature” Gigabyte deliberately built into their motherboards intended to “automatically” keep the drivers/firmware up-to-date.
The problem is it insecurely connects to the internet to download those updates so it’s susceptible to being hacked using a MITM (man-in-the-middle) attack that redirects those download attempts to a nefarious site.
BTW, Gigabyte isn’t the only motherboard manufacturer that does this.
Asus motherboards include a similar payload in their BIOS called “ASUSUpdateCheck.exe” that gets installed into the OS every time it boots to automatically update drivers/firmware.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPI used https://mxtoolbox.com/spf.aspx to check the SPF record for tworg.com and it appears it’s setup improperly.
It’s currently using these IP addresses:
v=spf1 ip4:38.113.1.0/24 ip4:38.113.20.0/24 ip4:65.254.224.0/19 ?all
When it “should” use your domain name instead (which will work for all IP addresses assigned to that domain name):
v=spf1 include:tworg.com ~all
It’s also using ?all at the end when it should be ~all.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPActually, it will!
While it won’t prevent access to a “spoofed” .zip/.mov site, it will detect that something’s being downloaded which will kick off its scanning process.
It saves all downloads to a “temporary” location, scans them for possible threats, and; if none are found; then puts them in the real download location on my PC.
If it detects a threat, it deletes the “pending download” from the temp location and pops up a notification explaining why it was blocked with an option to add an exception if I choose to.
If I choose to add the exception, I have to restart the download as the original file is no longer located on my PC!
And yes, this procedure does mean it takes a bit longer for my downloads to complete, but that’s better than possibly getting infected!
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPLike many other suggestions here on AskWoody, it’s up to each individual to determine the “level of risk” entailed in using it.
Since my anti-virus S/W scans files as they’re downloaded before it allows me to access them and I only download stuff from “reputable” locations, I saw no reason to also have to deal with “Windows” blocking my access to them and implemented that particular GP.
Of course, YMMV.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 31, 2023 at 8:17 pm in reply to: Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs #2563209All my PC’s are Win10 Pro and I never actually tried using Policy Plus, so I downloaded it and here’s what I discovered.
It shows the “Administrative Template” policies for Users or Computer but does not show the “Software Settings” or “Windows Settings” policies; which makes it useless for applying this particular policy!
As to why it doesn’t include those policy categories, only the developer could answer that question but I “suspect” they weren’t included because most users would never need them.
Unfortunately, this means Win10 & 11 Home users will need to modify their registry to apply this policy and, at this point, we don’t know if that actually works.
3 users thanked author for this post.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 31, 2023 at 7:39 pm in reply to: Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs #2563207It’s located in the \Services\Dnscache section of the registry so, unless you have the Dnscache service (DNS Client) disabled, it should.
Just be aware, there must be a separate key {Rule GUID} for each Name Resolution Policy you want to apply and the key names are a “randomly generated” 36 character hex value.
The key for my MOV block is {54a5f496-186f-459a-8f70-35ddd056de0b}
The key for my XYZ block is {7b5ab7dd-082b-4f47-95bc-552906b3ab4a}
(note: I didn’t attach the reg file for this one)The key for my ZIP block is {af9c213e-8011-4eb6-bac6-5e43da4bd456}
I scanned my registry and the \Services\Dnscache section was the only location using those values so you “should” be able to create your own key (as long as it follows that same format and is unique) and have it apply.
For more info about the Name Resolution Policy setting, see Microsoft’s Name Resolution Policy Table (NRPT) page.
(note: while that page indicates NRPT is for Windows Server 2012 & Windows Server 2012 R2, it also applies to the newer versions of Windows Server as well as Win10 & 11.)2 users thanked author for this post.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 31, 2023 at 7:52 am in reply to: Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs #2563088Two problems with using UblockOrigin or other “browser” add-ins to do this:
1- It only blocks browser access; “other programs” on your PC can still connect to those domains.
2- It only works for the specific browser that has the add-in installed.
The Group Policy method works to block access by all programs installed on your system!
4 users thanked author for this post.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 31, 2023 at 7:48 am in reply to: Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs #2563085As for the assertion…
the operating system will sometimes just ignore some of those registry entries
It appears that’s only true for Group Policies intended to block “automatic” Windows updates. I know the “registry settings” made by the Group Policies that block “automatic Windows Updates” stopped working on my Aunt’s Windows Home version quite some time ago (had to switch her internet connection to “metered” to stop them!)
But I’ve applied registry settings for “other” Group Policies, and they’ve always worked as expected, and I’ve see posts here on Askwoody by various users who’ve done the same on their Windows Home versions and, so far, they all seem to still work.
Of course, unless you never apply any Windows updates, Microsoft has ultimate control over your Windows installation during the update process and can chose to ignore any settings you’ve changed/applied!
Note: I haven’t been able to apply this new one to my Aunt’s Windows Home setup yet; she’s a CPA and hasn’t been willing to allow me remote access to her PC due to her current work load. I “may” be able to test it this weekend… if another Askwoody user doesn’t beat me to it first.
BTW, attached are the appropriate registry settings to block the MOV and ZIP suffixes, taken directly from my own registry after applying the Name Resolution Policy, as well as versions that will remove the block if you decide you don’t need it.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 31, 2023 at 7:21 am in reply to: Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs #2563074If so, can you provide a link to it?
The link provided by @alex5723 in the post immediately above yours provides detailed instructions on how to do this with one difference, it says to use IP address 127.0.0.1 instead of 0.0.0.0.
As @steeviebops points out in his below post, 0.0.0.0 is a “much better” option because 127.0.0.1 will “redirect” those domains to your local PC and, if it’s running a 3rd party DNS server (i.e. Anti-virus, VPN, etc., etc.) the block won’t work!
Using the 0.0.0.0 IP address will always work because it’s not a valid IP address for any software/hardware!
5 users thanked author for this post.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 30, 2023 at 9:19 am in reply to: How to change “User Account Control:Run as administrator” #2562895Open regedit and take a look at the entries, if any, in the following location:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\AppCompatFlags\Layers
If there’s an entry for that particular program (i.e. C:\path to executable\??.exe) with a value of ~RUNASADMIN, it’ll cause it to always run as Admin. To stop that from happening, simply delete that entry.
FYI, that section of the registry is where the properties/compatibility settings for programs are saved, if you’ve set any, and clearing the flags for that particular exe “should” have removed it from this section. But maybe it either didn’t properly get cleared or something keeps adding it back in?
Just FYI, that location on my own system has 10 entries but only 7 are set to ~RUNASADMIN and they’re for programs I specifically set to “Run as Administrator” using the properties/compatibility options.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 30, 2023 at 8:42 am in reply to: Two monitors, want different “fixed” wallpaper on each one #2562888Don’t know if this will work with two monitors having different desktop backgrounds, but it prevented my preferred background from “automatically” changing.
Step 1.
Right-click on an empty section of the desktop, select “Personalize” and, in the right-hand section, set the background to “Picture” and choose the specific image you want to always be displayed.
From what you’ve posted, you’ve already did this step but I’ve included it so others will know about it.
Step 2.
On the same Personalize window, select Themes in the left-hand pane, scroll down until you see the Sync your settings option and select it.
Turn the “Sync settings” toggle OFF.
Step 3.
Press Win + R, enter powercfg.cpl and press enter to open the main “Power options” window.
Click the Change plan settings option for the “active” power plan and then select the Change advanced power settings option at the bottom to open the Power Options “Advanced settings” window.
Expand the Desktop Background Settings > Slide show item and disable it for both “On battery” and “Plugged in“.
Step 4.
Enable the Group Policy Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Control Panel > Personalization > Do not display the lock screen.
Not sure if this one is absolutely necessary but, until I set it, my desktop background would sometimes start “automatically changing” after performing a Windows update and, after I set it, that stopped.
Reboot for all the settings to take effect.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
alejr
AskWoody MVPMay 30, 2023 at 5:24 am in reply to: Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs #2562859Group policy is not available in the Home version.
A 3rd party option that does allow you to apply Group Policies for the Home version is Policy Plus.
It makes the same registry changes as Group Policy on the Windows Pro/Enterprise editions but requires you logoff and/or reboot for them to take effect.
3 users thanked author for this post.
![]() |
Patch reliability is unclear. Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
1Password and passkeys
by
Alex5723
21 minutes ago -
Macrium user error:selected volume guid?
by
Deo
4 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 22621.1835 and 22624.1835 released to BETA
by
joep517
14 hours, 58 minutes ago -
Unexpected HP Install Request anfter removal of Norton AV
by
MikeAL8
11 hours, 6 minutes ago -
Will Incontrol stop Windows 11 22H2 update, if used after update is paused?
by
sdanr
16 hours, 37 minutes ago -
Restoring a Bitlockered System Image with Macrium Reflect Free
by
sdanr
20 hours, 1 minute ago -
Prevent emails from ever being seen in Outlook 2013
by
West Swan
15 hours, 31 minutes ago -
Windows Update
by
Richard Mitnick
16 hours, 39 minutes ago -
Vivaldi 6.1 with Bing chat , browsers mimic
by
Alex5723
23 hours, 34 minutes ago -
MS-DEFCON 2: Are you still on Windows 10 21H2?
by
Susan Bradley
13 hours, 4 minutes ago -
Word 2021 – Print View problems
by
WSjrasnic
21 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 25387 released to Canary
by
joep517
1 day, 14 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 23475 released to DEV
by
joep517
1 day, 14 hours ago -
WordPress added AI – Jetpack
by
Alex5723
1 day, 13 hours ago -
PXE Boot and Hyper-V virtual machines and other strange things
by
Simon_Weel
1 day, 17 hours ago -
Testing for adding table to post
by
alejr
1 day, 14 hours ago -
I honestly can’t tell if this is a scam or not
by
Susan Bradley
12 hours, 9 minutes ago -
New Life For Ten Year Old DIY NAS Hardware
by
bbearren
1 day, 5 hours ago -
June 2023 Office non-Security updates have been released
by
PKCano
2 days, 13 hours ago -
Web Apps from Brave Browser
by
Gale
1 day, 11 hours ago -
Firefox 114 offering Secure DNS Options – does AT&T ISP Support?
by
Tex265
1 day, 15 hours ago -
macOS 14 Sonoma
by
Alex5723
1 day, 17 hours ago -
Just a fyi – I think I’ll skip on an Apple Vision Pro hardware section
by
Susan Bradley
2 days, 15 hours ago -
What’s wrong with Windows 11?
by
Ascaris
6 hours, 25 minutes ago -
Streaming an iPad to a standard TV
by
MrJimPhelps
2 days, 8 hours ago -
clone to make backup laptop
by
greenbergman
19 hours, 53 minutes ago -
Problems with sound and USB ports
by
StavRoss
2 days, 22 hours ago -
Can you use WUShowHide on Windows 11 version 21H2?
by
southieguy
3 days, 5 hours ago -
Can we control the changes to our operating systems?
by
Susan Bradley
13 hours, 21 minutes ago -
Watch out for fake ‘Windows Defender’ scare
by
B. Livingston
15 hours, 15 minutes ago
Recent blog posts
- MS-DEFCON 2: Are you still on Windows 10 21H2?
- June 2023 Office non-Security updates have been released
- Can we control the changes to our operating systems?
- Watch out for fake ‘Windows Defender’ scare
- Diagnostics and testing? Get it all done in a flash.
- Dip your toe into Visio Online
- Desktop or Laptop? What’s your choice?
- Beware of Google’s .ZIP domain and password-embedded URLs
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2023 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.