Posted on November 2nd, 2016 at 10:29 17 comments
It’s an optional patch, so you won’t get it unless you ask for it.
The KB article is now up to revision 32.
Microsoft is careful to note (this time):
This update performs diagnostics on the Windows systems that participate in the Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program. The diagnostics evaluate compatibility on the Windows ecosystem and help Microsoft to ensure application and device compatibility for all updates to Windows. There is no GWX or upgrade functionality contained in this update.
It’s the Win8.1 analog to the much-discussed Win7 KB 2952664.
While Microsoft implies that the patch only does its snooping if you enable the Customer Experience Improvement Program, I haven’t found any official confirmation.
Posted on October 11th, 2016 at 19:52 76 comments
We know KB 2952664 snoops – and we’ve known that for more than a year.
Microsoft re-released it as a standalone patch today – Optional, Recommended.
Do we have any definitive word on what the patch does, whether it’s actually beneficial (and, if so, how?), or if it’s just a spy that deserves to get ignored and/or uninstalled?
Posted on October 5th, 2016 at 07:47 125 comments
It’s back, tho its purpose isn’t clear.
Why does Microsoft keep digging itself into the same hole?
InfoWorld Woody on Windows
UPDATE: I just got a nudge from SB and have appended this to the comments at the end of that InfoWorld patch:
I’ve just been told of a significant reason why some folks may want to install this new version of 2952664. It looks like the patch is used by the Windows Update Analytics service – and this is their telemetry hook.
I stand corrected: If you expect to use the Windows Update Analytics service, you need this patch.
SECOND UPDATE: Microsoft reached out to me with a statement that
There is no Get Windows 10 or upgrade functionality contained in this update. This KB article is related to the Windows Update and the appraiser systems that enables us to continue to deliver servicing updates to Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 devices, as well as ensure device and application compatibility.
The InfoWorld page has been updated, and the update should be propagating even as we speak.
Posted on July 6th, 2016 at 08:06 34 comments
It looks to me like Windows Journal has finally gone to the bit bucket in the sky.
InfoWorld Woody on Windows
Posted on June 10th, 2016 at 09:38 1 comment
I’ve seen several reports from people who have two versions of KB 2952664 sitting on their machines. Yesterday, ch100 sent me this explanation:
I don’t know how interesting this is for you as it seems to repeat regularly now.
Here is a screenshot of MU on Windows 7 64-bit Ultimate with 2 versions of KB2952664 on offer – one Recommended dated 12/04/2016, the other Optional dated Yesterday.
I am expecting that the Optional one will take over next main Patch Tuesday while the Recommended one will be retired at the same time.
Notice that both are unchecked by default.
The Important tab has the current Office 2013 Updates unchecked, less the Definitions Update which has already been installed.
Screenshots are as you would expect, showing two different versions of 2952664.
Posted on June 10th, 2016 at 05:28 17 comments
Guess that writing on the book has rolled over my brain – or I’m just getting lazy. You wouldn’t believe how many changes there are in build 1607. Anyway.
On Tuesday, Microsoft re-re-re-re-re(^16)-released three old familiar faces:
KB 2952664 – Compatibility update for upgrading Windows 7, version 21
KB 2976978 – Compatibility update for Windows 8.1 and Windows , version 25
KB 2977759 – Compatibility update for Windows 7 RTM (that’s the one for people who are still using the original Win7, and haven’t yet applied Service Pack 1), version 21
They’re all unchecked, optional updates, all related to Win10 marched upgrading, all equally ignorable. No doubt they’ll turn into “recommended” before too long. I last wrote about them two months ago.
Second verse, same as the first….
Posted on May 7th, 2016 at 05:09 15 comments
A very interesting synopsis from our very own ch100:
What are the differences between KB2952664, KB3150513, and the naughty “Get Windows 10” patch KB3035583?
KB2952664 (and its equivalents for other OSes and versions) is the baseline pre-requisite for all the others providing the telemetry baseline. It is mostly useful for the upgrading to Windows 10, but not only as it provides telemetry capabilities in a wider sense.
KB3150513 is not offered unless the previous one is installed and adds further functionality in relation to making Windows 10 upgrade more reliable. It has specific functionality in relation to applications compatibility and this is why is offered as a different KB number.
KB3035583 is purely adware/nagware, the bad guy which is neutralised by the Group Policies configured to do that or by Josh’s GWX Control Panel, or Steve Gibson’s tool, or Noel’s procedure.
What I find relevant is that the first 2 patches are offered to medium/large businesses running Enterprise Version or Enterprise/Pro + WSUS, while the last one KB3035583 is never offered to those businesses. They are the most important customers for Microsoft’s bottom line.
Which makes me think that, unless overly concerned about the telemetry issues, the other patches are not so damaging or annoying and may actually provide some benefit in certain instances. The larger businesses seem not to pay much attention to the telemetry issues and follow the official line from Microsoft. If anything, the communication back to Microsoft is blocked for network traffic and OS performance reasons and rarely for the content of it. The larger businesses are not typically offered an upgrade in place and are still offered KB2952664 and KB3150513 and maybe there are more to come.
There is certainly no benefit at all in installing KB3035583 unless and only if interested in doing in-place upgrade to Windows 10.
Even so, I upgraded long before all those patches mentioned here were released and my upgrade still completed successfully and I did it more than once. The three patches are just risk mitigation patches, not mandatory if upgrading from sources other than Windows Update, like the official ISO image. And it is actually a lot more reliable to use the ISO than Windows Update.
Posted on April 29th, 2016 at 09:58 13 comments
Can you reproduce this? From reader TB:
Windows 7 update kb2952664 has been around in several versions for about two years now. The latest came to me on 13 April 2016 – and it had a surprise inside!
First, the routines and applications contained in this update all date from either March or April 2016 – it’s all new stuff.
What’s REALLY new is that the Microsoft Compatibility Appraiser that’s installed seems to be more aggressive. I use Norton Antivirus and Identity Safe. These products don’t work with Microsoft’s Windows 10 browser, Edge and this is not new news. However, this update seems to take action: when I installed it, I could not access Identity Safe, even though I am running Windows 7. Apparently, the update modifies some of the code that Norton uses.
Why am I so sure? This was the only update I installed. When I installed it, Norton’s toolbar told me to ‘Access Vault’ in the Identity Safe box. If I pressed on that button, I saw a message: ‘ Reboot needed’. I did that, and nothing changed. There was no way to access the Identity Safe vault. When I uninstalled the update, Identity Safe worked again, the same way as it did before.
Determining what needs to be done and leaving flags for Windows 10 to use is one thing. Disabling software I paid for and should be able to use while I use Windows 7 is something else.