Woody Leonhard's no-bull news, tips and help for Windows, Office and more… Please disable your ad blocker – our (polite!) ads help keep AskWoody going!
Home icon Home icon Home icon Email icon RSS icon
  • Open source slammed in US government sponsored meeting

    Posted on August 27th, 2011 at 09:04 woody Comment on the AskWoody Lounge

    Last year, the US govt sponsored a meeting with Thai govt agency heads in Chiang Mai. In the meeting, the Microsoft rep “expressed concern over the [Thai government’s] Creative Economy policy of promoting the “open source” software model over the “commercial source” model as a means to curb piracy.”

    In the same meeting, the Business Software Alliance rep “urged the [Thai government] not to favor open source over commercial source. He argued that (1) the open source model has been shown to have an insignificant impact on reducing software piracy; and (2) by focusing on an open source policy, the [Thai government] signals the market to stunt the development of commercial source software, which in turn undermines Thailand’s ability to fully service market needs.”

    Our tax dollars at work, eh?

    Wikileaks cable. See paragraphs 9 and 10.

  • Microsoft fesses up to stealing code

    Posted on November 16th, 2009 at 05:51 woody Comment on the AskWoody Lounge

    Remember the incident I told you about last week, where Microsoft got caught stealing open source code, and using it in one of their own products? The company has finally fessed up.

    ‘Softie Peter Galli writes:

    After looking at the code in question, we are now able to confirm this was indeed the case, although it was not intentional on our part. While we had contracted with a third party to create the tool, we share responsibility as we did not catch it as part of our code review process.

    I’m not sure what Peter means when he says “although it was not intentional on our part.” Of course it was intentional. Not in the sense that some high level Microsoft committee made a deliberate decision to steal source code. But definitely in the sense that the culture at Microsoft still – after all these years – still emphasizes exigency over fair play.

    As compensation, MS has agreed to release the program as an open source program. Well, OK, but then what?

    Look at it this way. If, oh, Apple had stolen Microsoft source code – lifted it, copied it wholesale – and stuck it in an Apple product, what do you think would happen?

    The fact that Microsoft stole from some poor programmer (or small group of programmers) who can’t afford an army of lawyers makes all the difference, eh?