• Hard-disk imaging: In-use versus not-in-use hard disk?

    Home » Forums » AskWoody support » Windows » Windows Vista, XP and earlier » Questions: Vista, XP back to 3.1 » Hard-disk imaging: In-use versus not-in-use hard disk?

    Author
    Topic
    #490857

    In reading this post …

    http://windowssecrets.com/forums/showthread//156355-A-Ubuntu-Boot-Disk-Can-Be-Very-Handy

    I decided to try a win98 boot cd with ghost for dos that I’d made many years ago and see whether it would still work.

    My system is a intel P4 3.2ghz 4gb ram with a combo of STA and ide hard disks. My boot drive is IDE 80gb 7200rpm running XP SP3 and up to date with updates and security patches.

    The system booted to the CD OK, but when I ran ghost received the error message “insufficent stacks in config.sys. Increase the number of stacks and retry.”

    This led to me reading through this and other forums to identify the meaning of this message. An interesting question posed itself, since most imaging software is installed to the active hard disk: “When an image is reapplied to the hard disk, the imaging software under which the image was originally made MUST be installed onto an active in-use hard disk. This means the OS must have been installed first. Surely this is a waste of time? Wouldn’t it be much better if the image was obtained from an not-in-use hdd without any interference from the OS and other software – as in the case of my win98-ghost boot CD?

    So here’s some questions:

    1. Why is the “active” hdd system supposed to be better?

    and to me more importantly,

    2. How does one go about applying the image to a new hdd with an on-disk program without having to install the OS and imaging software first?

    Many thanks …

    Viewing 14 reply threads
    Author
    Replies
    • #1410605

      irjc,

      Most modern imaging programs allow for the creation of Boot Media using either Linux or Windows PE. This can either be a CD, USB Key, or a partition on a USB hard drive. When you boot the computer (with the appropriate Boot Media loaded) you press what ever key your manufacturer uses to present the Boot Menu (e.g. Dells use F12). When the menu appears you select the appropriate device and of you go no OS on the internal HD required.

      Many of us also prefer to make out images using this boot media as it gets Windows completely out of the way of the imaging software. HTH :cheers:

      May the Forces of good computing be with you!

      RG

      PowerShell & VBA Rule!
      Computer Specs

    • #1410606

      @RetiredGeek

      I’m familiar with Live CD/DVD images, but have never used one installed into “Program Files”. Does that software automatically create the “boot” aspect of the image if the target directory is a DVD/CD? If not, how can one use the software if the hdd is hosed?

      Sorry if I sound silly …

      • #1410626

        Does that software automatically create the “boot” aspect of the image if the target directory is a DVD/CD? If not, how can one use the software if the hdd is hosed?
        Sorry if I sound silly …

        If the HDD is already hosed you need another computer to get the Boot CD/USB Key setup. Of course if it is already hosed you probably don’t have an image that the Boot CD/UBB can read any way.

        Unfortunately, this happens all to often where these issues aren’t addressed until it’s already too late. You need to start taking regular images as soon as you get a new computer and keep them up to date. As soon as you install your imaging software of choice you need to make the Boot media IMMEDIATELY (there is an option on the programs menu to do this) and TEST to make sure you can boot from it. HTH :cheers:

        May the Forces of good computing be with you!

        RG

        PowerShell & VBA Rule!
        Computer Specs

    • #1410618

      Your boot CD or Ghost is probably just too far out of date to work properly and in this case you shouldn’t pay too much attention to the post you cited as it was more of a special purpose post. If you Google either Macrium Reflect or EaseUS ToDo and go to their websites, you can read about the process and even use either one of them to replace your old Ghost boot CD because they both have very good free versions.

    • #1410962

      FYI. I tried Macrium Reflect as suggested by F.U.N. and was pleasantly supplied. It’s not the image creation that’s vital, it’s whether the restore works properly too. Backup for a 16GB image took about 30 minutes and compressed to 2x4gb parts and a 2gb part. Restore took eight minutes including boot time. System working like it was before. Finally found a replacement for good ol’ DOS GHOST with Win98 boot CD.

      Many thanks for your help ….

      • #1411714

        FYI. I tried Macrium Reflect as suggested by F.U.N. and was pleasantly supplied. It’s not the image creation that’s vital, it’s whether the restore works properly too. Backup for a 16GB image took about 30 minutes and compressed to 2x4gb parts and a 2gb part. Restore took eight minutes including boot time. System working like it was before. Finally found a replacement for good ol’ DOS GHOST with Win98 boot CD.

        Many thanks for your help ….

        I tried a free copy of Macrium Reflect about a week ago and after that my PC started throwing BSOD’s.

        I didn’t bother to try to figure out the “WHY” of it, I just did a system restore and blew it off. No more problems now. I didn’t really like the program anyway. It seemed limited in options and was going to take way too long to backup my C drive. I would never, ever, do backups from within Windows.

        Laters!
        The Doctor 😎

    • #1411632

      A very good imaging software product is Acronis True Image. It is a paid product. However, both Seagate and Western Digital hard-drives have free imaging software based on Acronis, which only work on their respective hard-drives.
      See http://www.seagate.com/gb/en/support/downloads/discwizard/
      and http://support.wdc.com/product/downloaddetail.asp?swid=119

    • #1411712

      irjc
      Update your OS on the boot disk. W-98 is just too old.

      You’ll find the same version of DOS in either Windows ME or XP. Take your pick.

      As as for Ghost itself, you should be using Ghost 11.5 for backing up every OS from XP to Win-8.1.

      I do this every day, more or less, so I do know of what I speak.

      I started using Ghost back in 1997 when the original authors, first put it up on their bulletin board as a 30 day trail copy. The guy I was working for back then, would download a new copy every 30 days, for us to use in the shop. That’s where I fell in love with Ghost. Later, I found Ghost 2002 on a motherboard software/driver disk. Somehow, I upgraded to Ghost 2003, which worked OK for XP, but not for later OS’s.

      Jumping forward several years, I found a copy of Ghost 11.5 after hearing about it on a Ghost chat forum.
      I use it from a bootable Flash Drive or CD, using the DOS from Windows ME as the boot OS.
      It works just fine. By the way, if you use the DOS from a disk format in Windows XP, it will be the same DOS. Yeah, that one threw me too. lol

      I was doing something different, a while back, when I did get that same “Stacks” error, thingy.
      Then I went back to my old standard way of running Ghost and NO More Errors. I never did quite figure that one out. ???

      Laters!

      The Doctor 😎

    • #1411724

      tried a free copy of Macrium Reflect about a week ago and after that my PC started throwing BSOD’s.

      There are several users on this forum that use Macrium Reflect with no issues.

      I would never, ever, do backups from within Windows.

      I make regular backup images from within Windows using Acronis True Image and have never had a problem with either the backup or the restore. I find it convenient to be able to continue working with Windows while the image is being created. There are other users on this board that feel more comfortable creating their images outside of Windows. To each his own.

      Jerry

      • #1411747

        I make regular backup images from within Windows using Acronis True Image and have never had a problem with either the backup or the restore. I find it convenient to be able to continue working with Windows while the image is being created. There are other users on this board that feel more comfortable creating their images outside of Windows. To each his own.

        Jerry

        Image for Windows also supports imaging from within Windows. I’ve created images from within Windows, from dual boot (booted in 7 imaging 8 and vice versa) and also booting Image for Windows from USB. All are completely reliable.

        Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
        We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
        We were all once "Average Users".

    • #1412243

      Here’s why you might not want to be performing backup from within Windows.

      It is slower than running the same backup with the same program from a bootable (Rescue) CD.

      Even though the active Windows partition is “locked” this does not prevent a process from running, writing something to a critical system file, and stopping or ruining the backup in progress.

      Some files may still be in use, and may not be backed up properly.

      Restoration can never be done from within Windows. When you start a recovery process from within Windows, the program must shut down Windows and then perform the actual recovery operations as scheduled tasks from outside of Windows. This handing off of the process can result in a failed restore effort.

      (Aside — in Linux, which I am now runnning alongside of Windows 7 on my laptop, you CANNOT image or clone a partition from within Linux. You HAVE TO use external bootable CD or DVD media, or else hook up wiith a networked computer. Linux isn’t usually so much imaged as cloned, since its footprint is so small compared with 64-bit Windows installations. CloneZilla Live CDs are made for these operations, but the interface is very text-driven and can get a bit confusing unless you know how Linux enumerates partitions and drives.)

      For myself, I have finally gotten to the point where I automatically reach for the Boot CD when doing either backup or restore operations, regardless of OS. It’s safer, faster, and more reliable for me. YMMV.

      Macrium Reflect (for Windows) with the WinPE environment on a CD has more options and better flexibility than their Linux environment Rescue CD.

      Finally, DO NOT back up to CDs, DVDs or Flash Drives. They are all too unreliable as backup media. Get an external Hard Drive or Solid State Drive (preferably a pair of them and copy the image or clone so as to have an off-site copy just in case) and use these reliable devices for backups of your system. Recovery operations all too often fail when the image is spread over several CDs or DVDs. And my 165GB Windows 7 installation would span over twelve disks if backed up that way.

      So that’s the why and wherefor of backing up Windows (or Linux). Do it outside of the active OS partition for best results.

      -- rc primak

      • #1412247

        Here’s why you might not want to be performing backup from within Windows.

        It is slower than running the same backup with the same program from a bootable (Rescue) CD.

        I must say that this depends entirely on the software being used. With Image for Windows, it is not any slower. I’ve checked.

        Even though the active Windows partition is “locked” this does not prevent a process from running, writing something to a critical system file, and stopping or ruining the backup in progress.

        Some files may still be in use, and may not be backed up properly.

        Again, this depends entirely on the software being used. Image for Windows uses PHYLock, not VSS. The resulting image is a snapshot in time. Restoring such an image puts Windows right back where it was at that particular moment in time.

        Restoration can never be done from within Windows.

        True enough, but then we’re discussing making the image, not restoration.

        For myself, I have finally gotten to the point where I automatically reach for the Boot CD when doing either backup or restore operations, regardless of OS. It’s safer, faster, and more reliable for me. YMMV.

        I boot to the other OS and run Image for Windows, whether I’m restoring or imaging. Safe, fast, has never failed me. I dual boot primarily for the extremely useful versatility it offers in all manner of utilitarian chores.

        Finally, DO NOT back up to CDs, DVDs or Flash Drives. They are all too unreliable as backup media.

        My DVD’s proved quite useful and reliable in recovering from the house fire in 2010 that wiped out 2 PC’s and 2 laptops. Then again, my Windows 8 OS is only 17.9GB, and the Windows 7 OS is 25.9GB (of coarse, it’s about ten times as old as my Windows 8).

        But with larger drives, it is more convenient to backup to an external drive. And I would suggest having two, not just one.

        The bottom line is that we all do what we do for our own reasons. The most salient part of backup is just to do it. Choose a method with which one can be comfortable, and develop the habit of using that method with regularity.

        The most useless backup is the one you didn’t get around to doing; it’s also the most painful.

        Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
        We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
        We were all once "Average Users".

    • #1412249

      Indeed, no matter how we do it, the most important part of system backup is to do it. And before anything goes radically wrong!

      Since I’m new to Linux, I find I am doing more backups more frequently in there than in Windows.

      And I still prefer to do the backups outside of the active drive. It just feels safer to me, and for me, it is indeed faster. YMMV.

      -- rc primak

    • #1412321

      If you can continue to work while the backup image is being created, speed is not an issue. I’m making my weekly backup images right now as I’m reviewing forum posts. :rolleyes:

      But we all do what we are comfortable with.

      Jerry

    • #1412475

      Over the past 33 years, that I’ve been in the computer business, I’ve set up backup systems for Banks, Corporations, private businesses, CEO’s, and personal computer users.

      There is one theme that has always carried forward from DOS, to Windows 95 and on to today and Windows 8.1

      Will your last backup be restorable, to a new and blank hard drive, when your OS hard drive has just gone up in smoke?

      To assure that the answer to this age-old question is always “YES!”, I employ these simple rules:

      The backup/restore program should not be on the OS Drive, but on some, bootable and removable media and in several copies, for safety. Originally this was a floppy disk, but today it can be either a CD or a Bootable Flash Drive.

      Then the backup Image file(s) should be also on some removable media that can be stored in a SAFE place.

      In 1997 an unknown company in New Zealand released a program called “Ghost”. It worked!
      In a little shop I was working in at the time, we used it for cloning small hard drives to bigger hard drives, for our customers. In those days, we could run it from a 3.5″ Floppy Disk.

      In a computer store that I was in today, I was talking with the tech and I was surprised to find out that they still use the DOS version of Ghost 11.5, to clone hard drives. It’s quick, simple and just Works!
      That completely takes Windows out of the equation, so it can’t screw things up.

      Sorry this ran so long.

      Cheers Mates!
      The Doctor 😎

    • #1412482

      The regimen that I have tested and used allowed me to escape digitally unscathed from a house fire that claimed 2 PC’s and 2 laptops (and the house).

      We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do. Backup is one of those things that can be accomplished in many ways, with many different tools, successfully.

      The easiest way to make sure that an image works is to restore it. In forums and threads all over Windows Secrets the warning has been repeated that one should not store images on the same drive or in the same computer, but on a separate external drive.

      Most also advise having two external drives, rotating their use, storing multiple backups, and storing at least one external drive off site.

      The best backup regimen is one that will be used regularly, tested often, with backups kept in a safe place.

      The least useful backup is the backup one intends to make.

      Always create a fresh drive image before making system changes/Windows updates; you may need to start over!
      We all have our own reasons for doing the things that we do with our systems; we don't need anyone's approval, and we don't all have to do the same things.
      We were all once "Average Users".

    • #1413113

      The least useful backup is the backup one intends to make.

      I love it! That’s another way to say what I’ve been saying for the past 33 years……
      Great minds, like soup, run together! Eh?

      “The only bad backup, is the one that you decided NOT to make”. (just before your HD crashed)
      Even back in the early DOS days, I’ve been setting up backup schemes for my friends and customers.

      My own safest backups, are the ones I burn to DVD’s and then take 20 miles away and store in a Fireproof Vault. [Every backup should be Validated, before it’s considered finished]

      Since 1997, my backup program of choice has been Ghost, run from a bootable disk. Originally that was a 3.5″ floppy disk, but today, its a Flash Drive or CD.

      The fastest backup is always to a second internal hard drive. That’s not possible on most laptops, so an external (USB) drive will do. That external drive can be either a real hard drive, or a large Flash Drive.
      I use both, on my main system for data backups, which I do daily.

      One line in a batch file, using the old DOS command “XCOPY” does a daily Incremental Data Backup, to both of my USB drives, and only takes a few seconds to complete. It really don’t get no simpler than that. Eh?

      Cheers Mates!
      The Doctor 😎

    • #1413153

      I agree with The Doctor that data backups are brain-dead simple. I use copy commands for these, both in Windows and in Linux. If I had a large number of large files which change daily, I might use some sort of Sync or Cloud Sync routines. If I were using a Tablet, tethering to back up or syncing either locally or in the Cloud would be the best options, I would think. The right tool for the right job.

      -- rc primak

      • #1415149

        Many thanks guys, a very interesting read. I created an image and saved that to another internal hard disk from a USB boot flash drive with Macrium Reflect, then rebooted back to desktop and used PC for a few days while uninstalling programs, changing my wallpaper, Windows and Firefox theme. Then restored the image using the boot flash drive and the internal hdd. Back as it was, and it took only six minutes to restore.

        Copied the image to an external USB hdd, then deleted both Windows and Program Files folders – yes really. At reboot Windows wouldn’t start (can’t imagine why), so shutdown, connected ext hdd and boot USB flash drive and restored the image. OK.

        Now an external hdd with both image and data is stored off site. Data is also in the cloud as well as on several DVDs and another hdd stored in a dry shed at the back of the garden – complete with moisture absorbent stuff inside paper towels, then a hand towel in a small sealed cardboard box . Easy to get at and update.

        Again, thanks for your Comments. 🙂 🙂 🙂

    • #1415490

      irjc,

      Paper towels, Towels, Cardboard? These are all moisture absorbent materials. I’d ditch these for a Plastic box with desiccant packs (those little packs of beads that come in packaging). I’m just sayin… HTH :cheers:

      May the Forces of good computing be with you!

      RG

      PowerShell & VBA Rule!
      Computer Specs

    Viewing 14 reply threads
    Reply To: Hard-disk imaging: In-use versus not-in-use hard disk?

    You can use BBCodes to format your content.
    Your account can't use all available BBCodes, they will be stripped before saving.

    Your information: