In reading this post …
http://windowssecrets.com/forums/showthread//156355-A-Ubuntu-Boot-Disk-Can-Be-Very-Handy
I decided to try a win98 boot cd with ghost for dos that I’d made many years ago and see whether it would still work.
My system is a intel P4 3.2ghz 4gb ram with a combo of STA and ide hard disks. My boot drive is IDE 80gb 7200rpm running XP SP3 and up to date with updates and security patches.
The system booted to the CD OK, but when I ran ghost received the error message “insufficent stacks in config.sys. Increase the number of stacks and retry.”
This led to me reading through this and other forums to identify the meaning of this message. An interesting question posed itself, since most imaging software is installed to the active hard disk: “When an image is reapplied to the hard disk, the imaging software under which the image was originally made MUST be installed onto an active in-use hard disk. This means the OS must have been installed first. Surely this is a waste of time? Wouldn’t it be much better if the image was obtained from an not-in-use hdd without any interference from the OS and other software – as in the case of my win98-ghost boot CD?
So here’s some questions:
1. Why is the “active” hdd system supposed to be better?
and to me more importantly,
2. How does one go about applying the image to a new hdd with an on-disk program without having to install the OS and imaging software first?
Many thanks …