Hi all. I am hoping someone may be able to shed some light on a problem I have. In short, we have 2 computers in a home network, supported by a D-Link router (DI-704P) which also distributes a cable connection to each computer. Computer #1 is a Presario 1400 laptop with factory installed Windows ME and a Compaq 10-100 MiniPCI Ethernet NIC. Computer #2 is a nuts-n-bolts job containing more breeds of hardware than a Mad Max film, also running Windows ME and uses a 3Com Etherlink 10/100 PCI TX NIC(3c905B-TX). My problem is this, if I transfer a file of perhaps 50 MB from puter #2 to puter #1 it takes about 1/2 a minute – no problem there. However, if I transfer that same file, or one of equal size, from puter #1 to puter#2 it takes some 22 minutes – pretty poor. I’m quite new to networking and don’t know which computer is causing the problem i.e puter #1 may be transfering at a slow rate or puter #2 may be receiving at a slow rate. Any thoughts on guiding these 2 pesky puters down the path to data redemption would be greatly appreciated. Thank you – Michael.
![]() |
There are isolated problems with current patches, but they are well-known and documented on this site. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
Help with slow/fast network please
Home » Forums » Networking – routers, firewalls, network configuration » Help with slow/fast network please
- This topic has 9 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 20 years, 11 months ago.
Viewing 2 reply threadsAuthorReplies-
WSStuartR
AskWoody LoungerJune 27, 2004 at 2:24 pm #845207I assume that you have checked how long it takes to copy a large file to a similar location on each computer without using the network? If not then make sure that this is not a local issue by copying a file locally.
My first suspicion when faced with this sort of network performance problem is that one or other of the computers is using half duplex connections when the switch is using full duplex (or vice versa). Can you try forcing each computer in turn to use half and then full duplex (usually this is an advanced property of the network adapter).
StuartR
-
Jisp
AskWoody LoungerJune 30, 2004 at 11:54 am #846134Hi Stuart. Thanks for the reply. Basically I did all that you suggested. I don’t believe the issue is a local one. Also, forcing each computer between half/full duplex ( and combinations between the two ) made no difference either. Interestingly perhaps, I discovered last night while printing a large graphic file from puter#1 to puter#2(print server), the data transfer speed was fine yet if I try to send a copy of the same file to puter#2 hard drive the problem persists. I have run up to date virus scans and ad-aware on both machines with clean results so am still looking for configuration clues.
-
WSStuartR
AskWoody LoungerJune 30, 2004 at 9:24 pm #846411That is really strange, because a network print involves copying the file to the “Spool” directory of the remote print server. I’m afraid I’m all out of ideas on this one. I know of some issues that can cause slow file copies between Windows XP and Windows 2000, but I have little experience of Windows ME.
Can you try mapping a local drive on each PC to the same PC as a network share and testing a file copy (this will test the network software without using the network hardware, and may identify the slow PC).
Hopefully someone else may have some ideas for you, good luck.
StuartR
-
WSStuartR
AskWoody LoungerJune 30, 2004 at 9:24 pm #846412That is really strange, because a network print involves copying the file to the “Spool” directory of the remote print server. I’m afraid I’m all out of ideas on this one. I know of some issues that can cause slow file copies between Windows XP and Windows 2000, but I have little experience of Windows ME.
Can you try mapping a local drive on each PC to the same PC as a network share and testing a file copy (this will test the network software without using the network hardware, and may identify the slow PC).
Hopefully someone else may have some ideas for you, good luck.
StuartR
-
-
Jisp
AskWoody LoungerJune 30, 2004 at 11:54 am #846135Hi Stuart. Thanks for the reply. Basically I did all that you suggested. I don’t believe the issue is a local one. Also, forcing each computer between half/full duplex ( and combinations between the two ) made no difference either. Interestingly perhaps, I discovered last night while printing a large graphic file from puter#1 to puter#2(print server), the data transfer speed was fine yet if I try to send a copy of the same file to puter#2 hard drive the problem persists. I have run up to date virus scans and ad-aware on both machines with clean results so am still looking for configuration clues.
-
-
WSjscher2000
AskWoody LoungerJuly 4, 2004 at 2:05 am #847467Maybe this is relevant: I was reading recently about some “Internet connection speed-up” tuning software that let you set a large “TCP Receive Window” (in the registry, I think it’s called TcpWindowSize). There are some articles in the Microsoft Knowledgebase that report problems on internal networks with large TCP Receive windows and either certain traffic conditions or certain network cards. It has to do with the timing of the acknowledgement packets that the receiving computer returns to the sending computer (the packet that says, yup, I got that part of the file). If you are aware of having done any tweaking of this setting on computer #2, you might run a search in Google for those terms, adding site:microsoft.com, and see if any of that helps.
-
Jisp
AskWoody LoungerJuly 6, 2004 at 11:45 am #847956Good evening all. Ok, now for the odd wrap up. This problem seems to have somehow taken care of itself. I have no explanation other than to say yesterday I sent quite a large file from puter #1 to #2, expecting it to take 1/2 an hour to an hour, yet it took less than a couple of minutes to transfer. Have since tested with other files (and sizes) and everything is working pretty much as I would expect. To my knowledge no tweaking had been done on either system since testing your suggestions Stuart. All the same, thanks for your thoughts JS and Stuart. If I somehow come across an explanation I’ll post it. Michael.
-
Jisp
AskWoody LoungerJuly 6, 2004 at 11:45 am #847957Good evening all. Ok, now for the odd wrap up. This problem seems to have somehow taken care of itself. I have no explanation other than to say yesterday I sent quite a large file from puter #1 to #2, expecting it to take 1/2 an hour to an hour, yet it took less than a couple of minutes to transfer. Have since tested with other files (and sizes) and everything is working pretty much as I would expect. To my knowledge no tweaking had been done on either system since testing your suggestions Stuart. All the same, thanks for your thoughts JS and Stuart. If I somehow come across an explanation I’ll post it. Michael.
-
-
WSjscher2000
AskWoody LoungerJuly 4, 2004 at 2:05 am #847468Maybe this is relevant: I was reading recently about some “Internet connection speed-up” tuning software that let you set a large “TCP Receive Window” (in the registry, I think it’s called TcpWindowSize). There are some articles in the Microsoft Knowledgebase that report problems on internal networks with large TCP Receive windows and either certain traffic conditions or certain network cards. It has to do with the timing of the acknowledgement packets that the receiving computer returns to the sending computer (the packet that says, yup, I got that part of the file). If you are aware of having done any tweaking of this setting on computer #2, you might run a search in Google for those terms, adding site:microsoft.com, and see if any of that helps.
Viewing 2 reply threads -

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Worrying about how to Backup Yahoo Emails? Try the Yahoo Backup Tool! (Awaiting moderation)
by
jules28
2 hours, 14 minutes ago -
Worrying about how to Backup Yahoo Emails? Try the Yahoo Backup Tool! (Awaiting moderation)
by
jules28
2 hours, 16 minutes ago -
Is Aegean Airlines Safe to Fly? A Complete Safety Guide (Awaiting moderation)
by
jacksmith243
4 hours, 3 minutes ago -
Microsoft-Backed Builder.ai Set for Bankruptcy After Cash Seized
by
Alex5723
5 hours, 58 minutes ago -
Location, location, location
by
Susan Bradley
6 hours, 26 minutes ago -
Cannot get a task to run a restore point
by
CWBillow
7 hours, 23 minutes ago -
What is wrong with simple approach? (Awaiting moderation)
by
WSSpoke36
11 hours, 34 minutes ago -
Frustrating search behavior with Outlook
by
MrJimPhelps
2 hours, 21 minutes ago -
June 2025 Office non-Security Updates
by
PKCano
18 hours, 9 minutes ago -
Secure Boot Update Fails after KB5058405 Installed
by
SteveIT
12 minutes ago -
Firefox Red Panda Fun Stuff
by
Lars220
18 hours, 5 minutes ago -
How start headers and page numbers on page 3?
by
Davidhs
1 day, 4 hours ago -
Attack on LexisNexis Risk Solutions exposes data on 300k +
by
Nibbled To Death By Ducks
7 hours, 11 minutes ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26200.5622 released to DEV
by
joep517
1 day, 13 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26120.4230 (24H2) released to BETA
by
joep517
1 day, 13 hours ago -
MS Excel 2019 Now Prompts to Back Up With OneDrive
by
lmacri
1 day, 2 hours ago -
Firefox 139
by
Charlie
19 hours, 28 minutes ago -
Who knows what?
by
Will Fastie
9 hours, 49 minutes ago -
My top ten underappreciated features in Office
by
Peter Deegan
1 day, 13 hours ago -
WAU Manager — It’s your computer, you are in charge!
by
Deanna McElveen
1 day, 8 hours ago -
Misbehaving devices
by
Susan Bradley
9 hours, 38 minutes ago -
.NET 8.0 Desktop Runtime (v8.0.16) – Windows x86 Installer
by
WSmeyerbos
2 days, 19 hours ago -
Neowin poll : What do you plan to do on Windows 10 EOS
by
Alex5723
17 hours, 12 minutes ago -
May 31, 2025—KB5062170 (OS Builds 22621.5415 and 22631.5415 Out-of-band
by
Alex5723
2 days, 18 hours ago -
Discover the Best AI Tools for Everything
by
Alex5723
1 day, 17 hours ago -
Edge Seems To Be Gaining Weight
by
bbearren
2 days, 8 hours ago -
Rufus is available from the MSFT Store
by
PL1
2 days, 16 hours ago -
Microsoft : Ending USB-C® Port Confusion
by
Alex5723
3 days, 19 hours ago -
KB5061768 update for Intel vPro processor
by
drmark
1 day, 19 hours ago -
Outlook 365 classic has exhausted all shared resources
by
drmark
1 day, 18 hours ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.