Win10 1803 megathread

Topic

New Reply

I’m just joking. The real megathread is on Reddit. But it’s definitely not for the faint of heart. Here’s what I’m seeing on the latest build (bare me
[See the full post at: Win10 1803 megathread]

Reply | Quote

Replies

For those who use it, there’s a New Firefox 59.0.3 that fixes a Windows 10 April 2018 compatibility issue.
More info at: ghacks

Windows - commercial by definition and now function...

Reply | Quote

I suspect I missed a post confirming that this is version 1803 even though it’s dubbed April 2018 Update?

Reply | Quote

1803 update, dubbed April 2018 Update, that was nearly delivered in May 😛

Reply | Quote

Kinda gives you a warm and fuzzy feeling about build quality, amirite?

Well, the message is quite easy to understand, isn’t it?

You just get your group or ressource in the correct state. Gee.

Reply | Quote

On my install it shows up on the desktop as: Build 17134.rs4_release.180410-1804

On the other hand WinVer reports Version 1803 (OS Build 17134.1)

Seems MS isn’t quite sure!

May the Forces of good computing be with you!

RG

PowerShell & VBA Rule!
Computer Specs

1 user thanked author for this post.

Elly

Reply | Quote

Today (April 30) is International Jazz Day. Microsoft missed a great opportunity to name 1803 something other than April 2018 Update. (The folks at Bing marked IJD.)

EDIT: On second thought, UNESCO (which, according to Wikipedia, is the body that declared IJD) and the musicians behind IJD would probably balk at Microsoft co-opting it for its own use.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Elly

Reply | Quote

Tomorrow May, be International Blues day!

(especially for victims of forced W10 updates)

Windows - commercial by definition and now function...

3 users thanked author for this post.

Cybertooth, Elly, dononline

Reply | Quote

HA! Good one!

2 users thanked author for this post.

Cybertooth, Elly

Reply | Quote

For all of you new 1803 users, Microsoft’s Windows 10 protection from Spectre 2 is now gone.

1 user thanked author for this post.

columbia2011

Reply | Quote

@GoneToPlaid-

Where did you see that?

Does that mean that W10 will get a buggy patch to fix it, and then a buggy rollup, and then have to rollback to 1709… and then redownload… and a manual patch… and… well, you know…

We wouldn’t want W10 1803/4 users to feel ignored!

Whole library of W10 ISO’s saved up here… probably not ever going to want to use them…

Sure wishing you all the best…you’re going to need it!

Non-techy Win 10 Pro and Linux Mint experimenter

2 users thanked author for this post.

Noel Carboni, dononline

Reply | Quote

I searched for Spectre in the Reddit megathread. Not sure if anyone has confirmed it though. I don’t use Win10. Is 1803 passing tests for Spectre with the two online checkers that I am aware of?

Reply | Quote

@GoneToPlaid

Please tell us this is just a sick joke! Surely Satya and his Malware Makers aren’t playing THIS old tune again! Please!?

Reply | Quote

That Reddit thread makes it sound like an alpha build to many users! MS needs to get to a once a year release – 6 months to develop or deprecate, 6 to fix it, THEN release it.

2 users thanked author for this post.

Elly, dononline

Reply | Quote

Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes!

Reply | Quote

OK, I have installed 1803 on my 3rd hard drive. First question arises – how do I block installation of Candy Crush etc. in a nicest way on W10 Pro? I don’t want to turn off auto-update of Store apps… They keep reinstalling and reinstalling.

Fractal Design Pop Air * Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 750W * ASUS TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS * Intel Core i9-11900K * 4 x 8 GB G.Skill Aegis DDR4 3600 MHz CL16 * ASRock RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming 16GB OC * XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 1TB * SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB * Samsung EVO 840 250GB * DVD RW Lite-ON iHAS 124 * Windows 10 Pro 22H2 64-bit Insider * Windows 11 Pro Beta Insider

Reply | Quote

Before it used to say “Something Happened.” Now we know what happened.

😀

-Noel

1 user thanked author for this post.

Cybertooth

Reply | Quote

GoneToPlaid,

It does on my machine.

Powershell:

PS> G:\BEKDocs\Scripts\Get-SpeculationControlStatus.ps1
Speculation control settings for CVE-2017-5715 [branch target injection]
For more information about the output below, please refer to https://support.microsoft.com/en-in/help/4074629

Hardware support for branch target injection mitigation is present: True
Windows OS support for branch target injection mitigation is present: True
Windows OS support for branch target injection mitigation is enabled: True

Speculation control settings for CVE-2017-5754 [rogue data cache load]

Hardware requires kernel VA shadowing: True
Windows OS support for kernel VA shadow is present: True
Windows OS support for kernel VA shadow is enabled: True
Windows OS support for PCID performance optimization is enabled: True [not requi
red for security]

 

 

May the Forces of good computing be with you!

RG

PowerShell & VBA Rule!
Computer Specs

1 user thanked author for this post.

dononline

Reply | Quote

Ah, that is good news as it appears that Microsoft has baked Spectre 2 protection into 1809.

1 user thanked author for this post.

dononline

Reply | Quote

First benchmarks:

Unigine Valley – W8.1: 3213 / W10: 3243
ROTR – W8.1: 50.68 fps / W10: 51.45 fps
Arkham Knight – W8.1: 66 fps / W10: 67 fps
GTA IV – W8.1: 59.53 fps / W10 : 63.87 fps
Bioshock Infinite: W8.1: 97.54 fps / W10: 98.08 fps

 

Looks like there’s actually some improvment over W8.1 finally. All in all, does not look bad after a few hours of using. Will do further testing and maybe even switch at some point.

 

EDIT: funny thing… Just ran Cinebench R15:
W8.1 82.03 fps / 542 cb
W10: 101.16 fps / 539 cb

W8.1 Nvidia drivers to blame?

Fractal Design Pop Air * Thermaltake Toughpower GF3 750W * ASUS TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS * Intel Core i9-11900K * 4 x 8 GB G.Skill Aegis DDR4 3600 MHz CL16 * ASRock RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming 16GB OC * XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 1TB * SanDisk Ultra 3D 1TB * Samsung EVO 840 250GB * DVD RW Lite-ON iHAS 124 * Windows 10 Pro 22H2 64-bit Insider * Windows 11 Pro Beta Insider

Reply | Quote