• Ben Myers

    Ben Myers

    @ben-myers

    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 397 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: Steps to take before updating to 24H2 #2768300

      And the question is which Windows 11 version to install fresh on a computer, 24H2 or 23H2?  So far, 24H2 has worked out for clients whose computers I have set up recently.

    • in reply to: NotifyIcons — Put that System tray to work! #2761157

      Wow!  NotifyIcons does a lot, covering for several other freeware apps I install routinely on client computers.  Need to download it and give it a try.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Thunderbolt is not just for monitors #2755122

      Makes perfect sense.  So once again, Intel hurt itself with a decision that backfired, keeping Thunderbolt from becoming more widely deployed on Windows computer.  As such, it is a standard, but…

      On the other hand, Apple did not ever hesitate to use Thunderbolt chips in its kit.

    • in reply to: Thunderbolt is not just for monitors #2754523

      Interesting and certainly surprising.  My guess unsupported by actual facts is that Intel’s recent years of turmoil have distracted them from promoting Thunderbolt.

      Because most tower computers have a fair amount of internal real estate, it’s probably more cost-effective to mount an NVMe SSD on a card, but more work to do so.  Gee!  Open up the chassis and use a screwdriver!

      Some PCI-e cards handle two or more NVMe SSDs. I have used them and they work well, even in a pair of 24/7 servers that serve up VMs.  Heat dissipation can become an issue with the larger capacity SSDs, whether inside a computer or attached externally via Thunderbolt or USB.  Thermal pads help dissipate the heat.

      Mounting SSDs inside a Wintel computer reduces the need of many users for Thunderbolt-mounted SSDs.

       

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Thunderbolt is not just for monitors #2754520

      Significant, but up to a limit, not that high.  Both can provide enough power to SSDs, but not enough for a spinning hard drive or a Thunderbolt RAID array, both of which require their own power supplies.

      It is not clear how Thunderbolt deals with electrical shorts, although the perfectly symmetric modern connector and port go a long way to reducing the frequency of shorts.  By comparison, how often how you run into older USB ports in a laptop or desktop, because the owner was careless, and simply smashed a USB connector into a port upside down?  I have seen too many of these.

      AFAIK, a docking station and a USB hub are the solutions for working around a destroyed USB port, providing that there is still one USB port working correctly.  I recently bought a large number of tiny USB3 hubs that were surplus from a company.  Now I can offer an inexpensive hub to extend a single port to handle four USB connections.

      There is no point whatsoever in trying to repair a broken USB port on either desktop or laptop, unless the laptop design just happens to have an easily replaced interior part with the USB port and maybe some other function.  These possibilities are rare in my experience.

       

       

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Planning for the unexpected #2754452

      POTS is essential in areas where there is a constant threat of lost electrical power.  In over 40 years here, our old-style phone with copper wire has never failed, despite the substandard electrical service from National Grid.

      POTS is really good because it supplies the electrical power needed to be able to use a touch-tone phone that does not require its own electrical power.  We have two older touch-tone phones here, one on my desk with battery-operated caller ID in the phone circuit, and the other near a phone outlet in the kitchen.  My computer is connected to the same phone line, too, and I use it to send faxes to laggard medical and legal practitioners who eschew even encrypted email.

      Very useful is POTS, yet AT&T on the left coast and Verizon in our area want to rip up all the copper without offering a suitably reliable alternative.

      5 users thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2744084

      See my recent post with screen shot, using Intel CPU diagnostic to test AMD Ryzen.

    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2743889

      Does this work as a CPU diagnostic for AMD CPUs?  Seems to.  See screen shot.

    • in reply to: MS-DEFCON 4: Microsoft begins a strong push for 24H2 #2743609

      As several posts have stated, install Steve Gibson’s InControl to stop Win 11 24H2.  Why not make InControl part of the MS-DEFCON recommendations, hand-in-hand with the long list of known defects in 24H2.  And, of course, has Microsoft indicated when we might see an improved 24H2 with bug fixes or maybe a 25H1 with bug fixes to remove ambiguity as to just which 24H2 it is.

      I need to set up a couple of my clients with InControl on the Windows 11 systems they bought.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2741300

      I’ve thought about your considered response for a while now, much appreciated.  Here is what I have to say.

      In the context of assuring that a computer is working 100% A-OK, my motivations for testing CPUs are twofold.  I simply need to have assurance that a CPU is 100% functional.  I do not want to or need to test a CPU for hours and hours.  Intel’s test runs about 5 minutes, about right.

      Others may care about performance, but performance is not the goal of making sure a computer is working well UNLESS there is an obvious performance anomaly.  CINEBENCH is a very good test of overall computer performance, not just graphics.

      If, as part of setting up a computer for someone, I am asked to assess performance, I will do so, to make sure the performance meets buyer expectations.

      I still prefer an AMD-supplied CPU test available to the general public, but so far my request through AMD’s media people has been crickets.  AIDA64 is worth a look as a surrogate for an actual AMD utility.  Maybe Intel’s CPU test is, too, but I need to make the time to find out.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2741298

      I have not found changes to the driver version numbers in the wrappered drivers supplied by the name brand companies.  There is little motivation to change them, as the approach is to simply take what the chip manufacturers provide and add the wrappers.  Anything else becomes more work and more responsibility.

    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2741111

      Brink’s TenForums tutorial is very thorough.

    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2740385

      My error!  When my mouse pointer hovers over the icon on my task bar, the name “File Explorer” pops up.  Sorry about that.

    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2740381

      I suggest going to the Nvidia website to download and install the drivers for the Nvidia GeForce GT 730 video card.

      Device Manager shows one “CPU” for every thread.  The i7-6700 has four cores and eight threads.

      I am not 100% certain about the roles of all the drivers that are now hidden, but it’s better to install these drivers from the Dell web site than to rely on Windows Update. Dell also provides its somewhat automated procedure to update drivers for its models of computers.

      Updating the Dell firmware, usually the BIOS, is not absolutely necessary, but, if the Dell website calls the update urgent, do it.  The Dell website lets you search for the drivers and BIOS/firmware updates by model, using either the actual model or the service tag to find the drivers available.

      Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) is an open standard that operating systems can use to discover and configure computer hardware components, to perform power management (e.g. putting unused hardware components to sleep), auto configuration (e.g. Plug and Play and hot swapping), and status monitoring. – Wikipedia

      There is something that is poorly understood about drivers, with the misunderstanding created by the brand name computer manufacturers.  Whether the manufacturer is Dell, HP, Lenovo or any other brand name, the drivers used for a particular device or chip are the same ones, because the chips are identical.  Same with motherboards from Asus, Gigabyte, MSI and others.  All these companies do is put their own wrapper around the driver installation software to make it look like their own.

      In the cases of Intel, AMD, Nvidia and others (e.g. audio, SD card reader, webcam, mouse), the drivers on their web sites are more up to date than what Microsoft provides and often with additional features.

      To put it differently, Microsoft’s Windows update provides the bare bones of drivers. As an example, yesterday a client called me about his all-in-one printer-scanner-copier, saying that all he could do was print, not scan.  I found the link to download the  complete driver package for the printer, sent him the link.  He ran the installer and now he can scan documents.

       

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Let your PC start the new year right! #2740378

      My rule of thumb for hardware driver updates is not to use the ones provided by Microsoft, instead installing drivers from either the chip manufacturer’s website (e.g. Nvidia, AMD) or the website of the computer manufacturer.  More often, they are more up-to-date.  Video drivers offer more options, some of which may be very useful.

      1 user thanked author for this post.
    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 397 total)