-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPIt isn’t just Zone Alarm which delays the opening of the Windows Desktop (delays the startup of Explorer.exe, among other things). Avast has a boot-time rootkit scan which runs whenever you log into any account, every time. Comodo is another firewall with proactive defenses which delays other programs’ startups, sometimes causing drivers to fail to load (and resulting in a Blue Screen or reboot).
I do NOT recommend using the Windows XP firewall without third party additions. Vista and Windows 7 have perfectly good firewalls, but Windows XP’s firewall is infamous for its lack of outbound protections — the very kind of protections you need to detect and clobber today’s bots and Trojan Horse infections. Sometimes you have to just live with a certain amount of inconvenience for the sake of added protections. And Avast doesn’t really need to do its boot-time scans if you are doing weekly Deep Scans for rootkits anyway. So turn off the feature. Not so easy in Zone Alarm, which does not provide the user with such fine-tuning controls.
And do NOT apply Startup Delays to any firewall! You would be defeating the reason you have a firewall, by allowing some applications to launch and contact the Internet before they can be vetted by the firewall’s defenses.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPIt isn’t just Zone Alarm which delays the opening of the Windows Desktop (delays the startup of Explorer.exe, among other things). Avast has a boot-time rootkit scan which runs whenever you log into any account, every time. Comodo is another firewall with proactive defenses which delays other programs’ startups, sometimes causing drivers to fail to load (and resulting in a Blue Screen or reboot).
I do NOT recommend using the Windows XP firewall without third party additions. Vista and Windows 7 have perfectly good firewalls, but Windows XP’s firewall is infamous for its lack of outbound protections — the very kind of protections you need to detect and clobber today’s bots and Trojan Horse infections. Sometimes you have to just live with a certain amount of inconvenience for the sake of added protections. And Avast doesn’t really need to do its boot-time scans if you are doing weekly Deep Scans for rootkits anyway. So turn off the feature. Not so easy in Zone Alarm, which does not provide the user with such fine-tuning controls.
And do NOT apply Startup Delays to any firewall! You would be defeating the reason you have a firewall, by allowing some applications to launch and contact the Internet before they can be vetted by the firewall’s defenses.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPIt isn’t just Zone Alarm which delays the opening of the Windows Desktop (delays the startup of Explorer.exe, among other things). Avast has a boot-time rootkit scan which runs whenever you log into any account, every time. Comodo is another firewall with proactive defenses which delays other programs’ startups, sometimes causing drivers to fail to load (and resulting in a Blue Screen or reboot).
I do NOT recommend using the Windows XP firewall without third party additions. Vista and Windows 7 have perfectly good firewalls, but Windows XP’s firewall is infamous for its lack of outbound protections — the very kind of protections you need to detect and clobber today’s bots and Trojan Horse infections. Sometimes you have to just live with a certain amount of inconvenience for the sake of added protections. And Avast doesn’t really need to do its boot-time scans if you are doing weekly Deep Scans for rootkits anyway. So turn off the feature. Not so easy in Zone Alarm, which does not provide the user with such fine-tuning controls.
And do NOT apply Startup Delays to any firewall! You would be defeating the reason you have a firewall, by allowing some applications to launch and contact the Internet before they can be vetted by the firewall’s defenses.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPIt isn’t just Zone Alarm which delays the opening of the Windows Desktop (delays the startup of Explorer.exe, among other things). Avast has a boot-time rootkit scan which runs whenever you log into any account, every time. Comodo is another firewall with proactive defenses which delays other programs’ startups, sometimes causing drivers to fail to load (and resulting in a Blue Screen or reboot).
I do NOT recommend using the Windows XP firewall without third party additions. Vista and Windows 7 have perfectly good firewalls, but Windows XP’s firewall is infamous for its lack of outbound protections — the very kind of protections you need to detect and clobber today’s bots and Trojan Horse infections. Sometimes you have to just live with a certain amount of inconvenience for the sake of added protections. And Avast doesn’t really need to do its boot-time scans if you are doing weekly Deep Scans for rootkits anyway. So turn off the feature. Not so easy in Zone Alarm, which does not provide the user with such fine-tuning controls.
And do NOT apply Startup Delays to any firewall! You would be defeating the reason you have a firewall, by allowing some applications to launch and contact the Internet before they can be vetted by the firewall’s defenses.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Windows XP SP3, ALL your drivers should be backed up before applying this Service Pack. It’s not just the firewire drivers which can break or turn up missing.
Also, before doing any major Service Pack, users should make a full image backup or clone of their Windows partition or drive. It only makes sense, as hangups and other failures can occur.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPWell, at least we are seeing Google finally take one step to make their Chrome OS/ Chrome Browser more secure.
But I agree that while nearly all Chrome users could benefit from Avast, probably most Avast users do not want Chrome. No logic to that bundling, but Alwil must make money somehow if the free version of Avast is to survive. So I am ambivalent about this development. I think I can live with it, and I will remember to check the No Thanks checkbox for Chrome when installing Avast or during major Avast upgrades.
By the way, neither the Accept nor the No Thanks box comes pre-checked. You have to choose one or the other to proceed with the Avast installation. Much better than the way other free software places a check mark in the install box and you have to uncheck the box or suffer an unwanted adware installation.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPThere is complete control of Program Permissions in Comodo Firewall. The feature you need to access is part of the Defense+ part of Comodo.
From the System Tray Icon, right-click and click on Open.
Highlight the Defense+ Icon at the top of the Comodo Splash Screen.
In the left-sidebar, click on Advanced. In the main window of that screen, click on Computer Security Policy.
A pop-up window will show Application Name, Treat As, and several Radio Buttons.
The top section lists several applications to which Comodo Defense+ has already applied rule sets on its own. The next few sections contain greyed-out entries which the user cannot safely change. But the interesting section is labeled All Applications. This is a section of the rules applied based on user behavior when confronted with pop-up alert dialogs, and for many of us, the results get a bit out of whack from time to time. In this section you can make changes to get some applications’ restrictions lifted, tightened, or removed altogether. Simply highlight any entry there, and use the Edit Radio Button. Or, Delete to get Comodo to stop applying any of its rules to the application. (Removing entries will cause a lot of pop-up warnings and dialogs, but sometimes it is best to start over with permissions on some applications.) More often, you can get the correct settings by looking in the pop-up Edit dialog box, and changing the Custom circle to the Predefined Policy circle. This makes Defense+ treat the application in a more standard way. Which pre-defined policy you choose depends on the Application. The Comodo Help files, as well as their on line User Forums can offer guidelines about which predefined policies do what and allow which things to happen. Careful selection can greatly reduce pop-up alerts, while maintaining the permissions needed by the application.
That’s as much detail as I can go into in this limited space. Experience will guide you to better decisions when the Application Rules need to be changed. For the most part, they do not need to be changed, but it is nice to know how to do this if the need ever arises. This is not the same at all as the Zone Alarm page with the full table of Applications and Permissions which many of us are used to, but with practice, it will become just as useful, if not better, due to the predefined policies being more flexible than those found in Zone Alarm.
From the normal Tray Notification pop-up dialog balloons, you can select to Treat As and apply a policy, either per session, or (by checking Remember This Setting) permanently (or until you go inside the Defense+ settings and make a change manually). When encountering a warning, it is best at first not to check off the Remember box until you are sure this is the policy you really want to apply to this Application.
-- rc primak
-
rc primak
AskWoody_MVPRegarding Zone Alarm 9 acting up, not functioning, and then leaving behind undeletable Registry Keys:
(1) Zone Alarm has their own special uninstaller and cleanup tool. Apparently, the reader did use these tools.
(2) For a more reliable and complete removal of any software, using RevoUninstaller in its Level 4 Mode can automatically remove files, folders and most Registry traces left behind in most uninstaller operations. The new Revo Pro version ($40.00) can also cleanup many failed uninstalls and failed installs, as well as clean up Registry traces most Registry cleaners would have trouble with. I cannot guarantee success with either of Revo’s uninstaller programs, but I have successfully completely removed Zone Alarm Free with the free version. I generally use RevoUninstaller on any program I want to completely remove. Then I run CCleaner’s Registry and System cleaners to make sure everything is gone. Very important when trying for a clean install or a clean reinstall.
-- rc primak
![]() |
There are isolated problems with current patches, but they are well-known and documented on this site. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Who knows what?
by
Will Fastie
24 minutes ago -
My top ten underappreciated features in Office
by
Peter Deegan
21 minutes ago -
WAU Manager — It’s your computer, you are in charge!
by
Deanna McElveen
6 minutes ago -
Misbehaving devices
by
Susan Bradley
9 minutes ago -
.NET 8.0 Desktop Runtime (v8.0.16) – Windows x86 Installer
by
WSmeyerbos
17 hours, 45 minutes ago -
Neowin poll : What do you plan to do on Windows 10 EOS
by
Alex5723
13 hours, 29 minutes ago -
May 31, 2025—KB5062170 (OS Builds 22621.5415 and 22631.5415 Out-of-band
by
Alex5723
16 hours, 19 minutes ago -
Discover the Best AI Tools for Everything
by
Alex5723
16 hours, 28 minutes ago -
Edge Seems To Be Gaining Weight
by
bbearren
6 hours, 37 minutes ago -
Rufus is available from the MSFT Store
by
PL1
14 hours, 40 minutes ago -
Microsoft : Ending USB-C® Port Confusion
by
Alex5723
1 day, 17 hours ago -
KB5061768 update for Intel vPro processor
by
drmark
23 hours, 55 minutes ago -
Outlook 365 classic has exhausted all shared resources
by
drmark
20 hours, 6 minutes ago -
My Simple Word 2010 Macro Is Not Working
by
mbennett555
1 day, 13 hours ago -
Office gets current release
by
Susan Bradley
1 day, 15 hours ago -
FBI: Still Using One of These Old Routers? It’s Vulnerable to Hackers
by
Alex5723
3 days, 5 hours ago -
Windows AI Local Only no NPU required!
by
RetiredGeek
2 days, 14 hours ago -
Stop the OneDrive defaults
by
CWBillow
3 days, 6 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 27868 released to Canary
by
joep517
3 days, 16 hours ago -
X Suspends Encrypted DMs
by
Alex5723
3 days, 18 hours ago -
WSJ : My Robot and Me AI generated movie
by
Alex5723
3 days, 19 hours ago -
Botnet hacks 9,000+ ASUS routers to add persistent SSH backdoor
by
Alex5723
3 days, 19 hours ago -
OpenAI model sabotages shutdown code
by
Cybertooth
3 days, 20 hours ago -
Backup and access old e-mails after company e-mail address is terminated
by
M W Leijendekker
3 days, 8 hours ago -
Enabling Secureboot
by
ITguy
3 days, 15 hours ago -
Windows hosting exposes additional bugs
by
Susan Bradley
4 days, 4 hours ago -
No more rounded corners??
by
CWBillow
4 days ago -
Android 15 and IPV6
by
Win7and10
3 days, 13 hours ago -
KB5058405 might fail to install with recovery error 0xc0000098 in ACPI.sys
by
Susan Bradley
4 days, 16 hours ago -
T-Mobile’s T-Life App has a “Screen Recording Tool” Turned on
by
Alex5723
4 days, 19 hours ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
29 | 30 |
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.