• Sjors van der Horst

    Sjors van der Horst

    @sjorshorstco-nl

    Viewing 15 replies - 136 through 150 (of 153 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: edit cell (2000) #904360

      Hi Jeff,
      It works!
      I only had to change: Do While LCase$(rng.tagName) “td”
      into Do While LCase$(rng.tagName) &lt> “td” for 2000 to work.
      Great and many thanx.
      I would never have been able to write this.
      I couldn’t believe there was not a direct way to change this.
      I’ve done my part in “macro-ing” in Word and Excel, so I thought I do a quicky in FP too.
      Didn’t reckon with Bill B. though 🙁
      thnx again, George

    • in reply to: edit cell (2000) #904361

      Hi Jeff,
      It works!
      I only had to change: Do While LCase$(rng.tagName) “td”
      into Do While LCase$(rng.tagName) &lt> “td” for 2000 to work.
      Great and many thanx.
      I would never have been able to write this.
      I couldn’t believe there was not a direct way to change this.
      I’ve done my part in “macro-ing” in Word and Excel, so I thought I do a quicky in FP too.
      Didn’t reckon with Bill B. though 🙁
      thnx again, George

    • in reply to: edit cell (2000) #903888

      Hi jscher2000,
      sorry, but of course it’s html-table but it looks like an excel-table.
      It’s a vacancy/no vacancy table of which we have to change the color of the cells regularly.
      It’s too much of a hassle to do that by hand.
      That’s why I want to create several simple macro’s to change to red, orange or green and v.v.
      Any ideas?
      TIA
      George

    • in reply to: edit cell (2000) #903889

      Hi jscher2000,
      sorry, but of course it’s html-table but it looks like an excel-table.
      It’s a vacancy/no vacancy table of which we have to change the color of the cells regularly.
      It’s too much of a hassle to do that by hand.
      That’s why I want to create several simple macro’s to change to red, orange or green and v.v.
      Any ideas?
      TIA
      George

    • in reply to: edit cell (2000) #903886

      Thanx Leif,
      Seen that but that doesn’t help.
      I’m looking for specific commands to alter the color of the cell by macro.
      CU, george

    • in reply to: edit cell (2000) #903887

      Thanx Leif,
      Seen that but that doesn’t help.
      I’m looking for specific commands to alter the color of the cell by macro.
      CU, george

    • in reply to: format cells (2002 sp2) #850529

      Hey Rory the Pelvis ,
      That’s it!!!
      Simple but effictive, thanx.
      Any idea how it was checked, because I can hardly imagine it is checked by default.
      And this user is one that wouldn’t dare clicking on anything beyond input in cells.
      Nevertheless: Fixed Decimals have left the building.

    • in reply to: format cells (2002 sp2) #850530

      Hey Rory the Pelvis ,
      That’s it!!!
      Simple but effictive, thanx.
      Any idea how it was checked, because I can hardly imagine it is checked by default.
      And this user is one that wouldn’t dare clicking on anything beyond input in cells.
      Nevertheless: Fixed Decimals have left the building.

    • in reply to: spellcheck w2003 (Word 2003) #775081

      Hi Phil,
      Thanx for thinking with me. I has to do with the proofing tools.
      I guess it’s because I had to leave Outlook 98 on that machine it’s shared files stayed there too. Outlook 98 was an upgrade from 97 whick was installed with Office 97. I found normal.dot in the old dir of 97. For compatibility (syncing with a psion) they need outlook 98. They settled for turning of spellcheck. They can live with it.
      So, for now this thread can be closed. Thnx again. George

    • in reply to: spellcheck w2003 (Word 2003) #775082

      Hi Phil,
      Thanx for thinking with me. I has to do with the proofing tools.
      I guess it’s because I had to leave Outlook 98 on that machine it’s shared files stayed there too. Outlook 98 was an upgrade from 97 whick was installed with Office 97. I found normal.dot in the old dir of 97. For compatibility (syncing with a psion) they need outlook 98. They settled for turning of spellcheck. They can live with it.
      So, for now this thread can be closed. Thnx again. George

    • in reply to: spellcheck w2003 (Word 2003) #774256

      Phil, thanx.
      Glad this is a new machine, it took me about 15 minutes to complete these tasks.
      BUT: didn’t help I’m afraid.
      Anything else?
      George

    • in reply to: spellcheck w2003 (Word 2003) #774257

      Phil, thanx.
      Glad this is a new machine, it took me about 15 minutes to complete these tasks.
      BUT: didn’t help I’m afraid.
      Anything else?
      George

    • in reply to: Speed and Large (2000) #682264

      Thanx, I’ll think it over

    • in reply to: Speed and Large (2000) #682208

      Did I say kb?
      That should be just B.
      612 bytes. As you can imagine hardly anything was saved!
      Any idea?

    • in reply to: Speed and Large (2000) #682099

      Hans, thanx for your concern (bedankt).
      I’ve tried to Save As Html, but there only remains 612 KB 🙁
      I’m convinced there’s something wrong in the programming of the sheet.
      But it takes too much time and money to solve it. As a work-around we’re gonna split the larger files.
      I’s about numbers of employees. About 500 of them would make a file of 50 Mb.
      Split this in 250-250 and there remain two files of about 30 Mb. That’s acceptable.
      Thanks

    Viewing 15 replies - 136 through 150 (of 153 total)