• WSdevore1

    WSdevore1

    @wsdevore1

    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 80 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: filter / search a form (2003) #1123978

      Thank you, that works. However, the field in the MainTbl is now TypeID and is a numeric field, but all the entries (inlcuding a trial entry to see how it works) are text. Is that how it should be?

    • in reply to: filter / search a form (2003) #1123953

      Thank you, Hans. I can see how the filters work. You changed the ‘type’ table, adding a primary key. But that now shows only the Autoid # in the form. How can I get the form to show the text rather than the autoid?

    • in reply to: OpenArgs is null (Access 2003/XP) #1123909

      The db I sent was for ‘filter / search a form (2003)’, not this thread. Sorry

    • in reply to: OpenArgs is null (Access 2003/XP) #1123880

      Thank you- I’m sending it along.

    • in reply to: filter / search a form (2003) #1123868

      I’ve tried to follow your instructions, but I don’t get the desired result.

      I added a new table with all the staff names, called Staffname. I set up 2 fields, one named NameFilter and the other DescripFilter. I set NameFilter row source to the column in the Staffname table, and made the After Update
      Private Sub NameFilter_AfterUpdate()
      Me.DescripFilter.Requery
      End Sub

      For the DescripFilter, I made a query alled NameFilter, with column 3 having the project brief description. And the After Update to
      Private Sub DescripFilter_AfterUpdate()
      Dim rst As Object
      Dim strWhere As String
      If Not IsNull(MainFrm.DescripFilter) Then
      Set rst = Me.Recordset.Clone
      strWhere = “Person = ” & Chr(34) & Me.NameFilter & Chr(34) & _
      ” And Description = ” & Chr(34) & Me.DescripFilter & Chr(34)
      rst.FindFirst strWhere
      Me.Bookmark = rst.Bookmark
      End If
      End Sub

      When I choose a name from the NameFilter combo box, nothing happens. Do you have any idea what I did wrong?

      Many thanks

    • in reply to: Linked ODBC table (2003) #1062182

      Fantastic! Thank you very much. It worked like a charm.
      Judy

    • in reply to: Linked ODBC table (2003) #1061900

      Pat,
      Yes, I am running a query using the two tables, linked by this unique identifier field. One table has the ID as a numeric field, and the other table has it as a text field. That’s where Access says it can’t do it- becasue the fields aren’t the same.
      When you said to write that statement, what is the best way to do that? Where should that statement (“”&[ID] as alias) be written?
      Thanks so much for your help on this.
      Judy

    • in reply to: Linked ODBC table (2003) #1061616

      Hans,
      Thanks for the reply. There is no way to insert dummy records, unfortunately. I’ll try to attack it some other way.
      Judy

    • in reply to: Move data from one field into another (2003) #1043792

      Yes, I’m pulling data from a warehouse. I could pull one row for each item, but I have reasons for not wanting to do it that way. I want to pull all items (max 5) in one row.
      I’ll keep playing with it- something is bound to occur. Thanks for your help.
      Judy

    • in reply to: Move data from one field into another (2003) #1043684

      Thank you. I’ll play with that. I’d have to rename every table (up to 10/day) and then modify the field names in the Module for every query. At that point it might be simpler to aggregate each field into Excel and then pivot it. I’m trying to avoid having to make new tables since the tables may have a million or more rows each. But this at least gives me some ideas. I do appreciate it.
      Judy

    • in reply to: query to separate (Access 2000) #844734

      Thank you both- they work wonderfully!

    • in reply to: query to separate (Access 2000) #844735

      Thank you both- they work wonderfully!

    • in reply to: date autoinserting (2000) #707292

      Thanks, Hans. I’ll try that when I get abck to work.
      Yes, it’s still the 28th in our world, but perhaps the computer is possessed or in an alternate universe. Most strange!

    • in reply to: date autoinserting (2000) #707293

      Thanks, Hans. I’ll try that when I get abck to work.
      Yes, it’s still the 28th in our world, but perhaps the computer is possessed or in an alternate universe. Most strange!

    • in reply to: date autoinserting (2000) #707290

      The time zone is set correctly for Central time. This is the only ‘date’ function which displays the wrong date. Most puzzling.

    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 80 total)