• WSmroeder99

    WSmroeder99

    @wsmroeder99

    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 125 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • in reply to: Hightlight Rows Problem (Excel 2000) #977459

      Yes, Hans, it works perfectly.

      Thanks once again.

    • in reply to: Query Problem (Access 2K) #910724

      I apreciate the assistance and don’t have a problem with any criticisms. I am still a little confused by your description of the proper data design, but will definitely experiment with this. I guess I am so used to thinking one survey=one record with a separate field for each question.

      Again, as always you are an asset and always appreciated.

      Thanks Hans.

    • in reply to: Query Problem (Access 2K) #910725

      I apreciate the assistance and don’t have a problem with any criticisms. I am still a little confused by your description of the proper data design, but will definitely experiment with this. I guess I am so used to thinking one survey=one record with a separate field for each question.

      Again, as always you are an asset and always appreciated.

      Thanks Hans.

    • in reply to: Query Problem (Access 2K) #910696

      Yes, Hans that is correct. The problem also exists that some of the fields in the record will have a NULL value.

      Thanks

    • in reply to: Query Problem (Access 2K) #910697

      Yes, Hans that is correct. The problem also exists that some of the fields in the record will have a NULL value.

      Thanks

    • in reply to: Multiple updates based on another field (Access 2K) #899920

      OK solved this problem too.

      I just created a make table query with 2 fields, field1 and expr1, which is the sum of field2 in table1 and table2. I then ran the update query listed in the post above, except I changed it to point to table3 and included expr1

      The make table is listed below

      SELECT Table1.Field1, .[field2]+.[field2] AS Expr1 INTO table3
      FROM Table1 INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.Field1 = Table2.Field1
      WHERE (((Table1.Field1)=.[field1]));

      and the update is listed here:

      UPDATE Table1 INNER JOIN Table3 ON Table1.Field1 = Table3.Field1 SET Table1.Field2 = .[expr1]
      WHERE (((Table1.Field1)=.[field1]));

      I then created a macro to run both in order.

    • in reply to: Multiple updates based on another field (Access 2K) #899921

      OK solved this problem too.

      I just created a make table query with 2 fields, field1 and expr1, which is the sum of field2 in table1 and table2. I then ran the update query listed in the post above, except I changed it to point to table3 and included expr1

      The make table is listed below

      SELECT Table1.Field1, .[field2]+.[field2] AS Expr1 INTO table3
      FROM Table1 INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.Field1 = Table2.Field1
      WHERE (((Table1.Field1)=.[field1]));

      and the update is listed here:

      UPDATE Table1 INNER JOIN Table3 ON Table1.Field1 = Table3.Field1 SET Table1.Field2 = .[expr1]
      WHERE (((Table1.Field1)=.[field1]));

      I then created a macro to run both in order.

    • in reply to: Multiple updates based on another field (Access 2K) #899918

      Ok, solved the first part. It was simple, I just didn’t think about it enough.

      Used

      UPDATE Table1 INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.Field1 = Table2.Field1 SET Table1.Field2 = .[field2]
      WHERE ((.[field1]=.[field1]));

      Now working on adding the second one to the first.

    • in reply to: Multiple updates based on another field (Access 2K) #899919

      Ok, solved the first part. It was simple, I just didn’t think about it enough.

      Used

      UPDATE Table1 INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.Field1 = Table2.Field1 SET Table1.Field2 = .[field2]
      WHERE ((.[field1]=.[field1]));

      Now working on adding the second one to the first.

    • in reply to: Replication without Replication (Access 2K) #893365

      Thanks for the response.

      I have removed the replication from the version I am linking to SQL Server, which originally housed both the forms and tables. The front end is now split. I was trying to avoid having to redeploy the front end when the lookup tables changed, but will look into updating the tables at startup. I assume you have all the SQL tables linked and then just run a series of Delete and Append queries to update the local lookup tables?

      I will check out the link tonight as well.

      Thanks.

    • in reply to: Replication without Replication (Access 2K) #893366

      Thanks for the response.

      I have removed the replication from the version I am linking to SQL Server, which originally housed both the forms and tables. The front end is now split. I was trying to avoid having to redeploy the front end when the lookup tables changed, but will look into updating the tables at startup. I assume you have all the SQL tables linked and then just run a series of Delete and Append queries to update the local lookup tables?

      I will check out the link tonight as well.

      Thanks.

    • in reply to: Format IF? (Excel 2000) #877047

      Thanks again.

    • in reply to: Format IF? (Excel 2000) #877048

      Thanks again.

    • in reply to: Format IF? (Excel 2000) #877028

      Thank you Steve, this is what I was looking for. Will this custom format remain with the workbook or is there something else I need to do to ensure that when I distribute this, the custom formatting continues to work on other computers?

    • in reply to: Format IF? (Excel 2000) #877027

      Thank you Steve, this is what I was looking for. Will this custom format remain with the workbook or is there something else I need to do to ensure that when I distribute this, the custom formatting continues to work on other computers?

    Viewing 15 replies - 1 through 15 (of 125 total)