ISSUE 18.30 • 2021-08-09 LEGAL BRIEF By Max Stul Oppenheimer, Esq. Has the International Trade Commission come up with the opening wedge in eliminatin
[See the full post at: The sheriff in the inbox]
![]() |
Patch reliability is unclear. Unless you have an immediate, pressing need to install a specific patch, don't do it. |
SIGN IN | Not a member? | REGISTER | PLUS MEMBERSHIP |
-
The sheriff in the inbox
Home » Forums » Newsletter and Homepage topics » The sheriff in the inbox
- This topic has 13 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 3 years, 9 months ago.
AuthorTopicMax Stul Oppenheimer
AskWoody_MVPAugust 9, 2021 at 2:45 am #2382559Viewing 6 reply threadsAuthorReplies-
anonymous
GuestAugust 9, 2021 at 7:20 am #2382565What is the ITC to do? We have all these online sellers protected by the selling sites.
Us consumers face similar problems when a trade goes wrong. There is no indication who the seller is and where the seller resides.Perhaps the sales sites should be more thorough in verifying sellers and then keep a register of their contact details, accessible both by the consumer and the authorities.
Its currently just a lawless state out there
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
anonymous
GuestAugust 9, 2021 at 4:28 pm #2382786There is no indication who the seller is and where the seller resides.
The vendors name are quite strange revealing nothing however sellers vending wares through Amazon post the address of their business, just click on the store name. Ebay reveals the general location of sellers in their listings.
-
-
JeremyGH
AskWoody LoungerAugust 9, 2021 at 9:04 am #2382648Agreed – basis of the problem (AIUI) is Amazon’s concealment (or at least non-display) of the contact details of the seller/defendent/respondent. If Amazon does not say otherwise, then I would suggest that the default should be c/o Amazon; and if it comes to it then Amazon should have to stand up in court, and say why – as essentially a co-conspirator – they should not be liable…
My view is very much that – if you wnt to do business with me – I need to know who you are, what your address is and where you are based. And if you are dealing via an intermediary (Amazon.com, whoever), they either reveal – or defend the case.
-
Seff
AskWoody Plus -
Susan Bradley
Manager
-
-
wavy
AskWoody Plus -
Cybertooth
AskWoody PlusAugust 9, 2021 at 11:49 am #2382692If the concept Max discusses gains traction, it could open a whole can of worms. In the U.S., patent trolls have already been suing companies and even customers for the supposed infringement of patents in the equipment they use. Imagine now if you were to get sued by some troll in Uzbekistan for allegedly violating a patent on the printer that you innocently bought five years ago, and now you are summoned to defend yourself in a court in central Asia.
-
lurks about
AskWoody LoungerAugust 10, 2021 at 12:03 pm #2382931My concern is the court is in a foreign country with very lax procedures bordering on legalized lynching.
1 user thanked author for this post.
-
-
MrJimPhelps
AskWoody MVPAugust 13, 2021 at 5:20 pm #2383542Just curious, isn’t a person subject to the laws of the country where they live? Exactly what legal claim could the International trade commission have over someone?
I guess it all depends on whether or not the country you live in honors such demands by international organizations.
Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server -
OscarCP
MemberAugust 14, 2021 at 1:41 am #2383590“The United States International Trade Commission is an agency of the United States federal government that advises the legislative and executive branches on matters of trade. It is an independent, bipartisan entity that analyzes trade issues such as tariffs and competitiveness and publishes reports. As a quasi-judicial entity, the USITC investigates the impact of imports on U.S. industries, and directs actions against unfair trade practices, such as subsidies, dumping, intellectual property infringements and, copyright infringement“
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_International_Trade_Commission
So it does look like nobody who buy a printer or anything else at Best Buy is going to be hauled to Tajikistan to be tried there because of a complaint lodged by some local company alleging there has been a patent violation of some other form of malpractice that is bad for their business.
In fact, I am inclined to doubt that someone who buys a printer from Best Buy without any obvious signs of mischievous tampering with the product’s identification number or other identifier, perhaps in a plate bolted to the printer, is going to be served a summons to appear in court in the USA (where the ITC has jurisdiction and can compel people to answer complaints in court) because of an alleged patent or copyright violation by the maker of the printer, in Tajikistan or anywhere else. Can buying a printer be a fair or unfair trade practice, or a trade practice at all? I doubt that and I am, therefore, also inclined to think that the idea that the ITC is going to go after the buyers from a shop properly registered and legally allowed to sell printers or whatever else, particularly when they buy something that does not scream “This guy bought me knowing that I am really, really, really a dodgy product”, such an idea, in short, is a bit of a stretch.
The issue raised in the Newsletter article is more like this: what if what the ITC is doing sets the legal precedent in the USA that serving summons to appear in court for whatever reason, not necessarily having to do with the ITC, does not have to be made in person, and preferably where the one being summoned lives or has his or her business or office, and instead their summons, regardless of the nature of the complaint, are considered to be served by just mailing them to some other place, so the intended recipient may not get to know that has been summoned, fails to appear in court and gets into trouble, nevertheless, because of that?
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV -
OscarCP
MemberAugust 14, 2021 at 6:27 pm #2383691I want to add this:
If some judge in Tajikistan issues an order that someone living in the USA (and I would imagine in other countries as well) appears at his court to defend oneself against a complaint of, for example, violating the patent of some local company by buying the printer at Best Buy, for such an order to be obeyed, two things have to be true:
(1) That there is an extradition treaty between the USA and Tajikistan.
Is there one? Yes, there is — since 2003.
(2) That (a) some competent USA magistrate determines that the request for extradition is valid and (b) the reasons given for it are good enough to go ahead and grant it.
If the decision is to grant the extradition request, pack your bags, you have a long flight ahead.
But, regardless of the decision, this is likely to be, at the very least, a considerable hassle for the buyer of the printer: getting and paying lawyers, appearing in court, etc.
How likely it is that the extradition request will be granted? Good question! It depends on the judge, but I would think the reason given in the extradition request (buying the printer) is seriously likely to be laughed out of court. Particularly if the country where the request comes from is one that has several big marks against it in terms of, among other things, honoring the UN Human Rights Declaration and associated Conventions, in the list of countries with such serious issues kept by the US State Department (the UNHRD is not an International Treaty, but the related Conventions are, and therefore are the law of the land in their signatory countries).
So if Cybertooth lives in the USA, at least, he can relax somewhat, for now, and go buy the printer. I think.
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV1 user thanked author for this post.
-
Cybertooth
AskWoody PlusAugust 15, 2021 at 12:36 am #2383731Here’s a law journal article on the specific issue that I was thinking about: https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/797/
Last year, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the AIDS Healthcare Foundation were accused of patent infringement. Their alleged wrongdoing? Purchasing routers and using them to provide wireless services. A small Atlanta-based company called Bluewave, along with hundreds to thousands of small businesses, received demands for royalties for alleged patent infringement. The accusation? Using an off-the-shelf PDF machine. As incredible as they might seem, these mass patent assertions and the harm they cause are real – six out of the top ten patent litigation campaigns have exclusively named technology customers, not suppliers.
Not sure if or how subsequent legal developments may have affected this phenomenon.
-
OscarCP
MemberAugust 15, 2021 at 5:44 pm #2383855Sorry, Cybertooth for a mix-up, I was actually replying to lurks about’s concern expressed here #2382931 .
Ex-Windows user (Win. 98, XP, 7); since mid-2017 using also macOS. Presently on Monterey 12.15 & sometimes running also Linux (Mint).
MacBook Pro circa mid-2015, 15" display, with 16GB 1600 GHz DDR3 RAM, 1 TB SSD, a Haswell architecture Intel CPU with 4 Cores and 8 Threads model i7-4870HQ @ 2.50GHz.
Intel Iris Pro GPU with Built-in Bus, VRAM 1.5 GB, Display 2880 x 1800 Retina, 24-Bit color.
macOS Monterey; browsers: Waterfox "Current", Vivaldi and (now and then) Chrome; security apps. Intego AV
-
-
-
Viewing 6 reply threads -

Plus Membership
Donations from Plus members keep this site going. You can identify the people who support AskWoody by the Plus badge on their avatars.
AskWoody Plus members not only get access to all of the contents of this site -- including Susan Bradley's frequently updated Patch Watch listing -- they also receive weekly AskWoody Plus Newsletters (formerly Windows Secrets Newsletter) and AskWoody Plus Alerts, emails when there are important breaking developments.
Get Plus!
Welcome to our unique respite from the madness.
It's easy to post questions about Windows 11, Windows 10, Win8.1, Win7, Surface, Office, or browse through our Forums. Post anonymously or register for greater privileges. Keep it civil, please: Decorous Lounge rules strictly enforced. Questions? Contact Customer Support.
Search Newsletters
Search Forums
View the Forum
Search for Topics
Recent Topics
-
Freshly discovered bug in OpenPGP.js undermines whole point of encrypted comms
by
Nibbled To Death By Ducks
47 minutes ago -
Success Knows No End in the World of Online Slots (Awaiting moderation)
by
isobelhartmann1
56 minutes ago -
Cox Communications and Charter Communications to merge
by
not so anon
2 hours, 33 minutes ago -
Help with WD usb driver on Windows 11
by
Tex265
7 hours, 42 minutes ago -
hibernate activation
by
e_belmont
11 hours, 28 minutes ago -
Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 with AI assistant
by
Alex5723
15 hours, 15 minutes ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26200.5603 released to DEV
by
joep517
18 hours, 20 minutes ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview build 26120.4151 (24H2) released to BETA
by
joep517
18 hours, 22 minutes ago -
Fixing Windows 24H2 failed KB5058411 install
by
Alex5723
21 hours, 32 minutes ago -
Out of band for Windows 10
by
Susan Bradley
23 hours, 5 minutes ago -
Giving UniGetUi a test run.
by
RetiredGeek
1 day, 6 hours ago -
Windows 11 Insider Preview Build 26100.4188 (24H2) released to Release Preview
by
joep517
1 day, 13 hours ago -
Microsoft is now putting quantum encryption in Windows builds
by
Alex5723
59 minutes ago -
Auto Time Zone Adjustment
by
wadeer
1 day, 18 hours ago -
To download Win 11 Pro 23H2 ISO.
by
Eddieloh
1 day, 15 hours ago -
Manage your browsing experience with Edge
by
Mary Branscombe
20 hours, 24 minutes ago -
Fewer vulnerabilities, larger updates
by
Susan Bradley
8 hours, 50 minutes ago -
Hobbies — There’s free software for that!
by
Deanna McElveen
15 hours, 14 minutes ago -
Apps included with macOS
by
Will Fastie
13 hours, 6 minutes ago -
Xfinity home internet
by
MrJimPhelps
9 hours, 53 minutes ago -
Convert PowerPoint presentation to Impress
by
RetiredGeek
1 day, 11 hours ago -
Debian 12.11 released
by
Alex5723
2 days, 15 hours ago -
Microsoft: Troubleshoot problems updating Windows
by
Alex5723
2 days, 18 hours ago -
Woman Files for Divorce After ChatGPT “Reads” Husband’s Coffee Cup
by
Alex5723
1 day, 22 hours ago -
Moving fwd, Win 11 Pro,, which is best? Lenovo refurb
by
Deo
2 hours, 4 minutes ago -
DBOS Advanced Network Analysis
by
Kathy Stevens
3 days, 11 hours ago -
Microsoft Edge Launching Automatically?
by
healeyinpa
3 days, 2 hours ago -
Google Chrome to block admin-level browser launches for better security
by
Alex5723
1 day ago -
iPhone SE2 Stolen Device Protection
by
Rick Corbett
3 days, 6 hours ago -
Some advice for managing my wireless internet gateway
by
LHiggins
2 days, 14 hours ago
Recent blog posts
Key Links
Want to Advertise in the free newsletter? How about a gift subscription in honor of a birthday? Send an email to sb@askwoody.com to ask how.
Mastodon profile for DefConPatch
Mastodon profile for AskWoody
Home • About • FAQ • Posts & Privacy • Forums • My Account
Register • Free Newsletter • Plus Membership • Gift Certificates • MS-DEFCON Alerts
Copyright ©2004-2025 by AskWoody Tech LLC. All Rights Reserved.