• JNP

    JNP

    @jnp

    Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 47 total)
    Author
    Replies
    • First, thanks for your tireless work in sorting through this quagmire. Second, I would like clarification on just one point: In Windows 7, and/or 8.1, are the telemetry KBs now baked into the Security and Quality Rollups or do they remain separate KBs that Microsoft continues to push to us after they have been hidden? Again, thanks.

    • Woody and Susan,

      ZDnet has picked-up on the first part of Susan’s journey: https://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-patch-expert-begs-microsoft-please-fix-uptick-in-botched-updates/?ftag=TRE5575fdc&bhid=20703193368173122880888901483479 .  You might want to loop the author in on the “official” response of MS so the ZDnet story can be updated.

      6 users thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Happy 4th! #201380

      This specific couplet is found in the fifth verse, one of the “radical” verses, contained in “This Land”.  Woody Guthrie was afraid to perform these “radical” verses, particularly after the song became popular and, hence, because Woody didn’t perform them, they had become forgotten.  Near the end of his life, Woody became concerned people would never hear these verses again, so he took Arlo aside and made him memorize all the lyrics to “This Land”, seven verses in all, so that the “radical” verses would not be forgotten and would be passed on to future generations.  Like a good son, Arlo followed his father’s direction and has made sure, most of the time, to perform this verse while in concert or with smaller groups of people.  Woody Guthrie – A Life by Joe Klein, p. 437, hardbound first edition 1980.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • I was prompted by WordPerfect to make sure the conversion tool was installed before it was discontinued by Microsoft in April.  So, the logical conclusion is that, at least in some instances, WordPerfect needs this installed for file conversion or saving/opening.  This raises the possible question as to whether other office suites need this program in some situations?  It also “may” raise the question as to whether, at some point in time, Microsoft intends to become more protective of its proprietary software and ability of other programs to access/save, etc. documents created by that proprietary software?  I could be wrong about these questions.  Perhaps “anonymous” has a more evolved legal perspective than mine.

    • in reply to: Is it time to give up on 7-Zip? #171732

      If not 7-Zip, then what other program that does what 7-Zip does AND doesn’t contain the security holes about which you are concerned? (Redundant of post entered before logging in and tagged as anonymous.)

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: MS-DEFCON 1: Patches failing at a phenomenal rate #136889

      Well, I’m a life-long Cubs fan, so I am a certified masochist.  Still, I haven’t applied the patches.  More to the point, it seems very clear that, in particular, Win 10 is actually a Rube Goldberg machine, which MS seems to then apply a new Rube Goldberg machine to when the previous Rube Goldberg machine doesn’t work.  I think it was either Ch100 or Noel, who once commented that, in the past, it has taken a while for a new MS OS to stabilize.  I think that observation is true, although I didn’t have the problems with Vista others did and I found Win 7 stable from the get-go.  In any event, we’re deep enough into this to see there is likely no way out for MS and Win 10 now.  Again, Ch100 and Noel know more about this stuff than I, but with this track record of not fixing things, and often times making matters worse, to ultimately really fix this seems to me to be nearly impossible.

      What’s next for MS is unclear, but they’d be completely shortsighted, at this point, to end support for Win 7 in 2020.

       

      8 users thanked author for this post.
    • Reminds me of the classic joke:

      A man asked for a meal in a restaurant. The waiter brought the food and put it on the table. After a moment, the man called the waiter and said:

      “Waiter! Waiter! There’s a fly in my soup!”

      “Please don’t speak so loudly, sir,” said the waiter, “or everyone will want one.”

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Is Firefox going into a tailspin? #131371

      I forgot to sign in, the above anonymous was written by JNP.

    • in reply to: Is Firefox going into a tailspin? #131199

      Sam and Woody,

      This just in: Firefox WebExtensions may be used to identify you on the Internet .

      My strategy is set: I am staying with ESR as long as I can and then assess the FF alternatives, PaleMoon, Waterfox and there seem to be additional FF branches in the works.

      4 users thanked author for this post.
    • in reply to: Anti-Ransomware Software Overview Update #117952

      Noel, I am not going to get out a stop watch, well actually the only stop watch I have is on the computer as part of a small utility I use, but, in terms of memory, I’ve seen Cybereason RansomFree (CRF) as low as 5,000 k and as high as 15,000k (so far), a fraction of what Firefox or Thunderbird uses.  That said, it seems to hover, much of the time, in the 5,000-8,000 region.  This puts it, most of the time, just on either side of the memory used by Norton Internet Security.  The mere act of opening a new tab in Firefox does not, necessarily, increase CRF’s memory usage.  While my understanding of computers is somewhat limited, compared with peeps like you, it seems the nature of CRF might lend itself to being less of constant a resource hog than many of the programs on Martin Brinkmann’s list.  But, I imagine, Martin would have a better sense of this than I.

    • in reply to: What’s up with the “new” XP patch KB 982316? #117671

      I just ran Windows Update in my XP (ltsb/POS Ready 2009)/virtual machine setup.  No patch was offered.  As an aside, as of a few weeks ago, XP people are having trouble accessing Windows Update from either the security center or the control panel.  However, XP WU can still be accessed directly from the Internet at this page: http://update.microsoft.com/windowsupdate .  In fact, this will be the only way for one to view past updates, hidden updates, etc. if you are no longer able to access WU from the security center or the control panel.

      2 users thanked author for this post.
    • More than ever, PATCH RIGHT AWAY, and IMAGE RIGHT AWAY!

      You are so right about making frequent images. But if you wait a week or two after Patch Tuesday before installing the updates, you won’t be a Guinea Pig for everyone else if the patch has a problem. Read Woody’s information on the MS-DEFCON System (button in the bar at the top of the blog)

      1.  I know this version of anonymous is an attorney :).

      2.  I wanted to make this long for the new people and to stress the two most important things: a)  Bios settings and b) the necessity to learn how to at least restore from CD/DVD/Thumb Drive.

      3.  One strategy, to split the baby between ann. and PK, would be to image just before running WU and then just after.  If one does this, having a third image, older than a month would be advisable.

      4. I know Woody has questioned the value of Group B, but I could argue this is now a new world in PC-land and if you image just before Patch Tuesday, and then manually install the two security updates (a. for your version of Windows and b. the IE update) you can then have some added security during the time the full group of patches are completely vetted.  Worst case, there is something wrong with these two patches and you can immediately revert to pre-patch Tuesday status.  Best case, Groups A & B have two of the three patches (not .NET Framework) already installed, and Group A can do their thing once Woody announces all clear on the full group of Patch Tuesday releases.  The better question is not the viability of Group B, but the viability of Group W (BTW, seeing Arlo when he comes to town in October).

    • Benjamin Disraeli said: “I am prepared for the worst, but hope for the best.”  What we seem to be doing, these past few days, and it is most certainly vital, is something in between these two points: We are discussing how to avoid the worst.  Obviously, this is the best first line of defense and all that have contributed to this should be thanked profusely.

      But, we are not spending much time on the actual topic of “being prepared for the worst”.  And whether it is WannaCry/WannaCrypt, or something else down the road, I think we should be spending some time on what to do if you get hit.  So, this is going to be my topic, perhaps Woody will want to start a new thread for this topic.

      Back in November Woody posed the question: “What’s the best way to do a full image backup in Win7?”  This discussion can be found here: https://www.askwoody.com/forums/topic/whats-the-best-way-to-do-a-full-image-backup-in-win7/ .  Not surprisingly :), no consensus was reached, but a number of imaging programs were mentioned in this thread.  Those new to this site, since November, should strongly consider going back to read this thread.

      After that, to whatever extent you are unfamiliar with imaging your primary hard drive, and this is probably most valuable to the home user, the pros on this site will likely have their own strategies, it is time to become familiar with imaging and then starting to do it.  Because if you get hit, the best/easiest solution may be as simple as going back to a previous image (depending on how old the image is, some data will be lost unless you also are running constant backups of critical files).  But even if imaging isn’t the “full” solution, and you have to do a clean re-install, after that, you can then go to your latest image and get back to pretty great point, before the infection, where all/most of your programs are present, all/most of you data is present, and most important, all of your Windows updates, to that point, are present.

      I am an attorney by profession, so I am not the person to tell you how to image, what program to use (I use Paragon Backup & Recovery), etc.  That said, I do want to make one thing very clear to newbies to imaging: IT WILL NOT BE ENOUGH TO LEARN HOW TO IMAGE BY RUNNING YOUR IMAGING PROGRAM INSIDE OF WINDOWS FOR THE OBVIOUS REASON THAT, IF YOU GET HIT, AND ARE FROZEN BY SOMETHING, YOU CAN’T OPERATE IN WINDOWS.  So, yes, by all means, start to learn how to image within Windows but make certain you have a CD/DVD/Thumb Drive, containing the imaging program, and your bios is set to boot to this device/media before launching Windows.  If you don’t know how to do this, hire somebody to do it for you.  And make certain you know how to image but, more important, make certain you know how to restore an image from your CD/DVD/Thumb Drive.  Again, if you don’t know how to do this, or you can’t figure it out, then hire somebody to spend one or two hours to teach you how to do this.

      In summation: Now, more than ever, part of preparing for the worst must include knowing how to image and actually having images available for emergencies.  Personally, I keep two available (on an external hard drive that is turned off unless I am using it), just in case one image is corrupted.  Some may want more images, but two seems to be the minimum.  As for scheduling, you must decide for yourself the correct frequency for your situation.  But, please, if you don’t know how to create images of your primary hard drive, it’s time to learn, or be taught, a new skill.

      5 users thanked author for this post.
    • You may be able to bring XP “up to date”, this meaning XPLTSB (long term service branch) which MS made available to commercial customers, by following the recommendations here: http://www.pcworld.com/article/2310301/windows-xp-registry-hack-keeps-the-security-updates-rolling.html .  It worked for me in January of this year and WU, in XP, still presents me with monthly updates for my XP contained in a virtual machine that I need for legacy programs.  There will be a lot of updates, should this work, so be ready for that.

      Edit: If you choose to do this, and WU presents you with a list of updates, at least for the time being, hide the May .NET Framework updates, I encountered problems with these.  You can always circle back, after everything else is updated, to see if you can get these to install.

    • in reply to: Patch Tuesday is rolling out #113774

      I know it is an extremely small cohort, those running Windows XP in LTSB, but there appears to be, at least with my XPLTSB running in a virtual machine, a problem with: May, 2017 Security and Quality Rollup for .NET Framework 4 on WES09 and POSReady 2009 (KB4014605).  It will neither install with WU or as a download of the file to be executed manually from the hard drive: http://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=kb4014605 .  If you have Win XPLTSB set to load automatically, consider disabling and going to notify me of updates.  Then download the updates, select custom install, and deselect KB4014605.  Installation should proceed normally thereafter of the other XPLTSB updates and then you can see if your experience matches mine with regard to KB 4014605.

    Viewing 15 replies - 16 through 30 (of 47 total)