Keizer: Win10 usage increases, but Win7 is still holding its ground

Topic

New Reply

June was an interesting month for usage share. Per Gregg Keizer: According to California-based analytics vendor Net Applications, Windows 10 added a f
[See the full post at: Keizer: Win10 usage increases, but Win7 is still holding its ground]

2 users thanked author for this post.

Elly, GreatAndPowerfulTech

Reply | Quote

Replies

Any Windows10 gains are not surprising, considering the fact that just about everywhere you go to buy a computer, the only choice you have is either Windows10 or a Chromebook. Corporate purchasing is different; not too many corporations are going to go to BestBuy or Walmart to get their computers; they will go online to Dell or HP and order what they want from there, where they will be able to choose Windows 7 if they like.

I predict that many users who purchase the really cheap netbooks (with a 16GB or 32GB SSD) will soon abandon Windows10 when they find that the continually updating Windows10 chokes big-time with such a small amount of storage.

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

4 users thanked author for this post.

AlexEiffel, Elly, Charlie, FakeNinja

Reply | Quote

MrJimPhelps wrote:

Corporate purchasing is different; not too many corporations are going to go to BestBuy or Walmart to get their computers; they will go online to Dell or HP and order what they want from there, where they will be able to choose Windows 7 if they like.

I don’t believe this is the case anymore, and I think it’s been this way for about a year or so now. IIRC, all BTO sites removed Win7 as a choice. That’s not to say you can’t find any Win7 machines out there – 2 jobs ago, we continued purchasing Win7 Pro machines either new or refurb from various sites (NewEgg, Amazon, Microcenter). Basically, anything already on a shelf somewhere is up for grabs, but anything built today will not give you the option of Win7. (For the record I’m not sure if 8.1 is still a choice for BTO either, though I’d imagine on the server side, you can most likely still pick its sibling, 2012 R2.)

Furthermore, at least in my current role with a large org, any new machines (which I would assume come with Win10) are reimaged with 7 Enterprise. Supposedly they’re working on a Win10 rollout here, though I don’t have exposure to that here (whereas at my last job at another large org, I was an SCCM engineer during the finishing steps of their Win10 migration/rollout).

Reply | Quote

Win 7 is still apparently available at Dell on their Xeon systems…

-Noel

1 user thanked author for this post.

jburk07

Reply | Quote

Also on the OptiPlex 3050.

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

1 user thanked author for this post.

jburk07

Reply | Quote

Also from HP on the business side.

1 user thanked author for this post.

jburk07

Reply | Quote

Hmm, interesting. I thought this was pulled awhile back. I stand corrected 🙂

Reply | Quote

Kinda futile though.
1 1/2 years til EOL. If you are a consumer, you can choose to live without updates. But if you are an SMB, you can’t afford to do this. MY Dr’s office, dentist office, even the hospital I was visited yesterday are still running Win7. Who knows if their specialized programs will work on Win10. But they cannot afford legally to be without security updates. And they are obviously not E5.

ot only that, you are buying a processor that is probably not the leading edge. Which means it’s support EOL will also be sooner.

3 users thanked author for this post.

AlexEiffel, lurks about, Bill C.

Reply | Quote

While in theory that may be true, in practice there apparently are (or certainly were until recently at least in the UK, I can’t speak for elsewhere) still lots of hospital, doctors and dentists running XP, so it’s not unreasonable to assume that others will continue with Windows 7 well beyond the EOL.

This is all the more likely the longer Microsoft continue to make their security updates more problematic than the hypothetical threats they’re supposed to be protecting against.

Reply | Quote

In the medical field, some key software is written for a specific Windows release as that is what was approved by the regulators. Whether it will run on a later release is unknown and might be technically illegal (e.g. you can only run approved software on the approved OS version). Replacing/migrating the software is also probably well beyond the computer skills of your typical office staff. So does not happen.

Reply | Quote

Not to mention that it would also be beyond their budget!

Reply | Quote

If only doing security “Microsoft’s way” were something that delivered tangible benefits over what even a hobbyist could achieve I’d agree that business can’t survive without their support.

Though it was never perfect, unfortunately, “Microsoft’s way” has now turned into a balancing act. Consider these leading questions about their recent behavior, which are surprisingly hard to answer unequivocally:

• Has Microsoft delivered anything malicious or overtly harmful via a patch? (cough GWX cough)
  
• Are Microsoft patches well-enough tested to meet your business needs?
  
• Have any of Microsoft’s patches caused unacceptable performance loss in order to achieve “security”?
  
• Are you confident in where they are headed, and that you want to take your business there? I.e., do you really WANT to partner with Microsoft?
  
• Have you experienced security breaches even though you’ve kept systems patched?
  
• Do you have a security environment that’s not “standard, Microsoft’s way” that’s actually proving to be MORE secure than theirs (with its obvious conflicts of interest built in)?

There are many thought provoking reasons for this to not be cut and dried.

-Noel

3 users thanked author for this post.

WildBill, Seff, Elly

Reply | Quote

They could go with Windows 8.1, with Classic Shell, and configure it so that Windows 8.1 looks and feels just like Windows 7. Their specialized software would likely work in Windows 8.1; and this would give them three additional years – all the way till 2023.

I know that most companies would never think of doing this. The only thing they know about Windows 8.1 is that it has a very different interface; and they have never heard of Classic Shell.

Or, they could see if there is a MAC version of their specialized software. That is a very reasonable option for a small or medium-sized company.

There are cases of companies using specialized legacy (i.e. old) software to do specific, important tasks; and they cannot easily replace that software. And with the new ever-changing nature of Windows10, the risk of their software not working due to a Window10 update is greater than the pain of upgrading to Windows 8.1 or of switching to the MAC.

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

3 users thanked author for this post.

Noel Carboni, WildBill, Elly

Reply | Quote

@woody

https://www.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/8wjs13/windows_your_upgrade_is_ready_to_install/
https://www.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/8wki72/i_sitting_on_windows_7_got_a_prompt_to_upgrade_to/

2 topics on /r/windows claiming their Win7’s are asking to upgrade to Win10 today.
Could this be an unexpected return of GWX? :O

1 user thanked author for this post.

WildBill

Reply | Quote

Steve Gibson’s   “never 10” is still available to down load for free.

Reply | Quote

I just installed 7 a few days ago and Microsoft told me very clearly I was running an outdated OS and suggested a few times to use 10 instead… But I didn’t have any issue with it installing SP1, then 126 patches in one shot and they didn’t force me on 10 or anything.

1 user thanked author for this post.

Noel Carboni

Reply | Quote

Since when is 7 outdated?

Wait a minute, is it 2020 already?

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

2 users thanked author for this post.

AlexEiffel, WildBill

Reply | Quote

I installed Windows 7 recently, and by avoiding all telemetry updates, I did not/do not have to deal with diagtrack or CompatTel… because they do not exist on my system. It actually feels really good…

Non-techy Win 10 Pro and Linux Mint experimenter

2 users thanked author for this post.

AlexEiffel, Noel Carboni

Reply | Quote

Shame on those people on reddit for not installing the KB3184143 update onto their Win7 systems if they don’t want a Win10 upgrade prompt (and perhaps failing to hide/block KB2952664 & some other non-essential Win7 updates)

If they have not obtained the KB3184143 update or if Windows Update does not offer it, just download & install that update to remove all Win10 upgrade offers.

well, AlexEiffel, check if you have the KB3184143 update installed onto your Win7 machine and make sure that KB2952664 is NOT installed or removed from your computer.

I think I’ll slipstream/integrate that KB3184143 update onto my Win7 SP1 installation media in case I do a fresh install of Win7 SP1 on an old computer.

2 users thanked author for this post.

WildBill, ch100

Reply | Quote

Does anyone know if the person or persons are still employed at Microsoft who, in the process of forcing the engineers to code in stuff like GWX, utterly destroyed their reputation as a supplier of serious productivity software?

Leading question: When a company issues a patch to remove a malicious feature, when can you trust them again?

-Noel

2 users thanked author for this post.

WildBill, MrJimPhelps

Reply | Quote

zero2dash wrote:

Could this be an unexpected return of GWX?

It wouldn’t surprise me. And it doesn’t hurt anything to install software to block a Windows 10 upgrade.

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

1 user thanked author for this post.

WildBill

Reply | Quote

I’ve never uninstalled GWX Control Panel. I’ve never seen a reason to do so.

Reply | Quote

Copied from the thread for “Win10 usage share stagnating” (posted before this was):

Doing some estimates based on Keizer’s current & previous articles, here’s how the breakdown for all Windows systems comes out: Out of all PC’s, Win10 nnnn 35.7%, Win8/8.1 6.1%, Win7 41.7%, Win Vista 0.3 (0.4?)%, Win XP 4.1 (4.0?)%. That gives me the 87.9% total, which should mean Apple (macOs/OS X) & Linux (distros/Chrome OS?) have 12.1%. Yet Keizer’s figures for Apple are at 9.7% & for Linux at 1.9%, which adds up to 11.6%. The 0.5% difference is probably statistical; I would think there would be more Chromebooks around to account for more than 0.5%

As for the breakdown for strictly Windows: Win10 40.4%, Win8/8.1 6.9%, Win7 47.3%, Win Vista 1.3 (1.4?)%, Win XP 4.1(4.0?)%.

Bought a refurbished Windows 10 64-bit, currently updated to 22H2. Have broke the AC adapter cord going to the 8.1 machine, but before that, coaxed it into charging. Need to buy new adapter if wish to continue using it.
Wild Bill Rides Again...

Reply | Quote

It’s getting harder to find Windows 7 refurbished computers, but you can still find them; and you can still find some Windows 8 refurbished computers.

Here are a whole bunch of refurbished Dell OptiPlex computers with Windows 8.1:

https://www.dellrefurbished.com/desktop-computers?filter_operating_system=209&limit=50

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

3 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, WildBill, Seattle27

Reply | Quote

I am not surprised by the durability of Windows 7.  The Windows XP to Windows 7 transition demonstrated eloquently how many systems were running that could not or would not be upgraded to Windows 7 even up to EOL, XP in that case.

Reply | Quote

Here is a nice refurbished computer for $419:
Dell OptiPlex 9020 Small Form Factor
* Windows 8.1 Professional 64-bit
* Haswell chip – not bitten by the Windows 7/8.1 auto-update bug
* DisplayPort, DVI, and VGA video. It appears to have multiple DisplayPort video ports, which means that you could plug in multiple monitors.
* PS/2 keyboard and mouse ports
* RS-232 serial port!
* 6 USB2 ports, 4 USB3 ports
* 8 GB RAM
* 500 GB hard drive
* DV-RW drive

https://www.dellrefurbished.com/desktop-computers/dell-optiplex-9020-138924.html

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

1 user thanked author for this post.

WildBill

Reply | Quote

Hmmm and did I spy easy access to the case? surely a good candidate for an SSD. With, hopefully, Legacy/UEFI and Secure boot enable/Disable in the BIOS (for Win7x64 fans), seems I could well have underestimated “The Power of Dell” 🙂

Reply | Quote

I have a small Haswell system that boots and runs from a 4 SSD RAID array. It’s very, very responsive.

-Noel

Reply | Quote

These Dell refurbs are good, very durable PCs that would be a good basis for a home, but non-gaming, PC.  This one is decently specced with 8GB ram in dual channel (many are 4GB with a single stick) and a fast i5.

On the ones I have looked at the HDD is often not a 7200 RPM drive and is slooooow (as most were corporate leases, lowest bid often won out).  An SSD would be a big improvement.  Additionally the power supply has minimal overhead, often being under 300 watts (mini-tower is 290, SFF is 255, and some of the older ones were proprietary), which along with the case size limits your discrete video options.

However these were never intended for gaming, so buying one to convert is trying to make a racecar from a minivan.

They are however great for a Linux box or a cheap home theater PC.  My first step would be to uninstall the GWX enabling patch and the telemetry ones for Win8.1.

It is also a good choice for a peson with older peripherals since it has a parallel post for a printer (yes, many HP Laserject IIs are still working and you can get toner), and serial ports, along with USB 2 and 3.

Reply | Quote

I bought a Dell OptiPlex 5050 last December.  It came with Windows 10 Pro, but I had downgrade rights, which I invoked.  It shipped with Win 7 Pro, but the Win 10 license is saved in BIOS–waiting, I suppose, for the moment I see the light.

I wonder if this counts as a Windows 7 sale or a Windows 10 sale?  The latter, possibly, since that’s the way the box was sold.  Could it possibly be considered a Windows 10 “active device”?  If so, this may enhance MSFT’s Win 10 lies da***ed lies statistics.

Reply | Quote

On 02 July 2018, the published Netmarketshare(= Net Applications) numbers for June 2018 were completely different, ie Win 10 numbers was stagnant while Win 7 numbers increased by >1%. …
https://news.softpedia.com/news/windows-10-still-can-t-keep-up-with-windows-7-521790.shtml

What happened ?

Reply | Quote

Different ways of measuring usage is the most likely cause. But stepping back, one should look at the overall picture. Windows 7 has half more or less of all the active Windows machines even with the massive push and that it is not readily available in your typical retail outlet. Also, the rates of change of 7 vs 10 indicates at 7’s EOL it will have a very large share of the Windows market; probably about 30 to 40%. This is rather large number of boxes still running 7 and will be running 7 for some time.

1 user thanked author for this post.

WildBill

Reply | Quote

I’ve been seeing on different forums that Microsoft is trying to force pc’s to upgrade to Win 10 again..

Reply | Quote

If you have evidence of this, it would be much appreciated 🙂

Windows - commercial by definition and now function...

Reply | Quote

About eight months ago, I worked on a computer that had been off for a couple of months. When I powered it on, the first thing it did was try to upgrade itself to Window10. (It was a Windows 8.1 computer.) So here is a case of GWX occurring 10 months ago, long after the supposed end of that program.

The only way that we “know” that GWX has ended is because Microsoft says it has ended. But I have a hard time trusting anyone who interprets my hitting the red X in the upper right of the screen as ‘yes’.

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

5 users thanked author for this post.

Noel Carboni, JohnW, Elly, BobbyB, geekdom

Reply | Quote

I continue to read of forced Windows10 upgrade. Windows 10 is zombie.

On permanent hiatus {with backup and coffee}
offline▸ Win10Pro 2004.19041.572 x64 i3-3220 RAM8GB HDD Firefox83.0b3 WindowsDefender
offline▸ Acer TravelMate P215-52 RAM8GB Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1265 x64 i5-10210U SSD Firefox106.0 MicrosoftDefender
online▸ Win11Pro 22H2.22621.1992 x64 i5-9400 RAM16GB HDD Firefox116.0b3 MicrosoftDefender

1 user thanked author for this post.

jburk07

Reply | Quote

anonymous wrote:

I’ve been seeing on different forums that Microsoft is trying to force pc’s to upgrade to Win 10 again..

I’m guessing after a few million more Windows 7 machines are “accidentally upgraded” to Windows 10 we’ll be seeing the all too familiar “Oops, sorry – we made (another) mistake, that wasn’t supposed to happen” line from MS.

Gets a bit tiresome after a few years. And, why they’ve been allowed to get away with this sort of behaviour for the past 3 years continues to escape me.

3 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, lurks about, Microfix

Reply | Quote

Carl D wrote:

why they’ve been allowed to get away with this sort of behaviour for the past 3 years continues to escape me.

What do you suggest we do about it?

Group "L" (Linux Mint)
with Windows 10 running in a remote session on my file server

Reply | Quote

I keep my Win7 box set to manual updates only.  And I check that any recommended updates to be applied are only ones that are clearly safe.

Windows 10 Pro 22H2

Reply | Quote

DOJ used to care about what monopolies did…

-Noel

1 user thanked author for this post.

Elly

Reply | Quote

How come your numbers from the same source on 02 July 2018 were different and showed the opposite? …
https://www.askwoody.com/2018/win10-usage-share-stagnating/

Reply | Quote

Microsoft might be trying to forced Windows 10 again

https://twitter.com/Princess_Grassp/status/1014340965992022017

1 user thanked author for this post.

jburk07

Reply | Quote

Another Reddit user got a prompt to upgrade to Windows 10:

https://www.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/8wubr3/windows_7_user_i_believe_windows_is_forcing_me_to/

Reply | Quote

anonymous wrote:

Another Reddit user got a prompt to upgrade to Windows 10: https://www.reddit.com/r/windows/comments/8wubr3/windows_7_user_i_believe_windows_is_forcing_me_to/

From a quick read of that thread, it appears that MS had a dedicated scare-net advocating upgrades to Win10, by talking security (ransomeware) and EOL (‘soon’).

Coincidently, I re-activated the GWX Control Panel about 2 months ago since I got a feeling this might happen.  I still check WU after every update to verify it remains set to “do not check.”  Fool me once, etc.

2 users thanked author for this post.

jburk07, geekdom

Reply | Quote